Questions For Anthony Lawson About His Tv Fakery Debunk Attempts Options

[Killtown]

1. In your debunk attempt video September Clues - Busted!, do you still stand behind the following explanation of yours @ 6:20 that you claim debunks Shack's theory of what caused his "nose out" theory? (yes or no)

(IMG:http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/3042/631xe1.gif)



2. You make the comment @ 6:50 that the object seen exiting the South Tower in the Gamma Press shot is a "plane-like shape," but then claim afterward that this "plane-like shape" is "obvious that it is building debris driven out by the explosion."

(IMG:http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/4259/652sr7.gif)

a. Are you saying that it is just a HUGE coincidence that the object seen exiting the South Tower with a shape you described as "plane-like" takes on a VERY SIMILAR shape as the "nose in"? (yes or no)

(IMG:http://img387.imageshack.us/img387/5396/nosedoutjh8.gif)

b. I'm assuming you say the "plane-like shape" is "obvious that it is building debris driven out by the explosion" because the object seemingly "disappears" into the explosion a few frames afterward.

Are you implying that is would be impossible for graphic artists to make a CGI nose cone appear to do the same? (yes or no)



3. At about 7:00 into your same debunk attempt video, you make the claim that the reason for the "fake to black" in the FOX 5 video after Shack thinks it shows the nose of the "plane" seen entering exits the building:

(IMG:http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/411/fox5jo0.gif)

is because there was an "electronic disturbance caused by power disruption" in which you used the following video to support your claim: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk0gIA2lPRc

The TV reporter on that video says at least one NY TV station went off the air immediately after one of the towers was hit. Which tower was he referring to? (North or South)



4. You also bring up the CNN/WABC7 shot @ 7:13 as evidence of a "power disruption":

(IMG:http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4517/cnnby9.gif)

Is it just a coincidence that the camera shot changes and the "fade to back" happens as soon as the "plane" fully disappears behind the Towers and then switched back after about 5 seconds to capture the rest of the explosion? (yes or no)

a. Is it also just a coincidence that 2 other major network "live" shots of the second hit also changed their camera shot right before the "plane" supposedly hit the South Tower? (yes or no)

(IMG:http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/6639/cbsjy5.gif) (IMG:http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4492/nbcnf4.gif)

b. Is it also just a coincidence that the above 2 and only other major network "live" shots that would have caught whatever exited live out the South Tower as the FOX chopper 5 shot did just happened to change camera views that didn't show what ever exited the South Tower live? (yes or no)

(IMG:http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/411/fox5jo0.gif)



5. It looks like you only tried to debunk a few of Shack's many claims in "Sept Clues" he thinks proves TV fakery. Wouldn't the following title for your video be more accurate and less dishonest assuming you did indeed debunk the claims you chose: "Few of the Many Claims in September Clues - Busted!" (yes or no)

This post has been edited by Killtown: Jun 12 2008, 03:20 PM

[Killtown]

Where did Lawson go? You'd think he would be rushing to defend his work and not looking like his avoiding it.

[Killtown]

Lawson won't defend his own debunk attempts. Why?

[rob balsamo]

Lawson doesnt care to engage kids i suppose? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Either that or he hasnt stopped by...

[Killtown]

Lawson doesnt care to engage kids i suppose? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Either that or he hasnt stopped by...

No, he sent me an insulting PM. He knows about this thread. Guess he doesn't feel confident enough to back up his work.

[albertchampion]

we have been here before, i think. many times.

i didn't start my career as a forensic metallurgist, but that is one of the places i ended up. one thing i discovered is that though someone might complain about a critical component failure, and complain enough to energize my analysis, when the analysis disagreed with their ideas as to the cause of the failure, they preferred to ignore the analysis. especially when the analytical mirror reflected their personnel as the cause of the failure.

and that is the one of the themes governing the understanding of the events of 11/09/01. very few care to grasp reality.

this ostrichness is one of the longest running attributes of humankind. i don't pretend to understand the cause[s]of self-imposed ignorance. all i can tell you is that it is one of the governing aspects of humankind.

i care to tell you that i have performed extensive metallurgical failure analyses. that are incontrovertible. and that when the victims of the catastrophic failures have reviewed the results of the analysis, they have always agreed with the results immediately. have signed off on the conclusions of the analysis. but sometime later, they have repudiated those results.

so, science does not rule. surprised, aren't you?

i close this way....the realities of the events of 11/09/01 could have been revealed had the impact sites been treated as a crime scene and subjected to forensic examination[s]. but the potus prevented that.

if dennis kucinich didn't identify that crime, please allow me to: a misprision of a felony - tampering with a crime scene.

gangsters. all of them gangsters.

and tim russert. just another agitprop agent for the state. most of the world would have been better off had his atherosclerosis manifested itself decades ago.


and then there is the pewlitzer winner, lawrence wright. for the looming tower. what do you think? an agitprop asset? sheltered by the new yorker magazine[edited by a zionist].

is there really an al-fresco?

or is that just an illusion?

[Killtown]

I think it is very telling the Lawson won't come and defend his own work, but labels people like Shack a liar because he thinks Shack's "mistakes" are lies and not just mistakes (if they even are).

[Killtown]

So since Lawson is too much of a coward to back up his own work, does any of his supporters want to take a stab at the OP?

[Domenick DiMaggi...]

So since Lawson is too much of a coward to back up his own work, does any of his supporters want to take a stab at the OP?

i'm not that nose out stuff messes with me......lol

oh yeah im not one of his supporters either i just followed the link and felt like contributing nothing to this thread.

now i'll bow out gracefully....lol

This post has been edited by Domenick DiMaggio CIT: Jul 17 2008, 05:17 AM

[Killtown]

LOL! Well at least you responded. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)