Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum _ Lobby _ English Transcript Of Japan 911 Testimony

Posted by: bill Jan 14 2008, 09:38 AM

Transcript Of Japanese
Parliament's 911 Testimony
From Benjamin Fulford

Below is a transcript of testimony in the Japanese Parliament that was broadcast live nationwide on NHK television. The Member of Parliament talking about 911 is Yukihisa Fujita from the Democratic Party of Japan. After the testimony Mr. Fujita says he got lots of phone calls from other members of Parliament thanking him for having the bravery to bring up 911 in Parliament. He also got one death threat.

Meanwhile, I asked the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan to invite him for a press conference. Each of several attempts to send an e-mail to the FCCJ about this resulting in my hotmail account freezing and my computer crashing. Also, it was amazing to watch the shameless verbal acrobatics of American corporate journalists trying to prevent this press conference from taking place. Fortunately, journalists from the rest of the world supported a press conference and we will try to get it to take place as soon as possible.

The secret government's control of Japan is falling apart. A few weeks ago one of Japan's leading commercial TV networks also broadcast a 911 truth program during prime time. One other national network and several local networks have also broadcast such programs.

The people of Japan do not want to finance genocidal mass murderers any more///

Head of the committee: We will now begin the first session of the defense and foreign affairs committee.

We will now start discussing the special anti-terror law. .We now call on Mr. Yukihisa Fujita

Fujita standing in front of microphone: .

This will be the last televised broadcast of this committee for so I would like to talk about the origin of the war on terrorism which was the attacks of 911. On September 11 of 2002 I went to a theater house for a charity concert to help build a school in Afghanistan. They chose to have the charity concert on that day as a gesture of respect for the dead. Normally 911 commemorative events are for the people who died in New York but the people who held this event decided that more innocent people died as a result of 911 in Afghanistan than in New York. So they built a grade school near where the statue of Buddha was destroyed in Bamiyan. The name of the school is "the school of hope." They also lit candles to commemorate the dead both in Afghanistan and in New York in the year 2002, one year after the attacks. So, when discussing these anti-terror laws we should ask ourselves, what was 911, what is terrorism? So today, I would like to talk about the beginning of the war on terror.

So, I would like to ask the people who call this law an anti-terror law to realize that the biggest victim of the war on terrorism has been Afghanistan so I believe helping the people of Afghanistan should be our biggest priority. I would like to ask Mr. Inuzuka about this.

Tadashi Inuzuka walking to the microphone:
As Mr. Fujita says the main purpose of this law is to provide peace and security to Afghanistan. And, as he says, the biggest sufferers have been the people of Afghanistan. Afghanistan has 1.7 times the land area of Japan and 20 some million people live there. Also, because of a drought on the Eurasian continent close to 5 million have died due to water shortages. Even now 1 million people live close to the main battlegrounds. So, the main purpose is to provide stability to those war zones so in that context what should Japan do? However, instead of providing support by providing fuel to the U.S. forces we at the Democratic Party have decided that providing water is more important. The philosophy behind our anti-terror law is to get the ruling party to help deal with this problem.

Head of the committee: Mr. Fujita

Mr. Fujita:

I would like to talk about the origins of this war on terrorism. You may recall that in November I asked you if terrorism was war or if it was a crime. And the whole start of this war on terrorism was 911. What I want to know is if this event was caused by Al Qaeda or not. So far the only thing the government has said is that we think it was caused by Al Qaeda because President Bush told us so. We have not seen any real proof that it was Al Qaeda. I would like to know why the Prime Minister thinks it was the Taliban who was responsible for 911. Committee Chief, I want to ask the Prime Minister because he was chief cabinet officer at the time.

Prime Minister Fukuda:

Since the attacks we have communicated with the U.S. government and other governments at different levels and exchanged information. According to secret information obtained by our government and reports put together by foreign governments the 911 attacks were carried out by the international terrorist organization known as Al Qaeda.

Mr. Fujita:

So, you are talking about both secret and disclosed information. My question is has the Japanese government carried out its own investigation using the police and other resources? It is a crime so surely an investigation needs to be carried out. When a Japanese journalist was shot in Myanmar you carried out an investigation. In the same way over 20 Japanese people died on 911 so surely the government carried out its own investigation and decided that Al Qaeda was responsible. So, what kind of investigation did you carry out? At the time you were Chief Cabinet Secretary so surely you would know better than anybody so I want to ask you about your investigation.

Prime Minister Fukuda:

After the 911 attacks the National Police Agency sent an emergency anti-terror team to New York. They met with U.S. government officials and gathered information about missing Japanese.

Mr. Fujita:

So you are saying over 20 people died as a result of a crime and most of those people were working in New York. Also there were some Japanese who died in the four airplanes that were hijacked. I would like to know exactly how many people died in the buildings and how many died in the airplanes. I also want to know how you confirmed this. I would like the Foreign Minister to answer for me.

Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura standing at right in front of microphone:

We found the bodies of over a dozen Japanese following the simultaneous terror attacks carried out on September 11 2001. We were also informed about the death of 11 more people by the U.S. authorities. In total 24 Japanese died in those attacks. Of those 2 were in the airplanes.

Mr. Fujita:

I would like to ask what flights the two Japanese who died in the airplanes were on and how you determined who they were. If the foreign minister does not know it is OK to get a bureaucrat to answer:

Foreign Ministry division chief Ryoji Tanizaki:

Since this a question of fact, I will answer. As the Foreign Minister said, of the 24 people who died two were on the airplanes. One of them was on United Flight 93 and the other was on American airlines flight 11.As for how we know this, well I do not have the information in front of me but we were told by U.S. authorities and, in general, they use DNA testing. So we believe that is how we know about those two people.

Mr. Fujita:

So you are saying you do not know because you do not have the documents. Also, you say you believe there was DNA testing but you do not know. So what I want to say today is that this was a crime and crimes are supposed to be investigated. So the government needs to inform the victims families of the results of their investigation. Also, instead of just observing the anniversary of 911 every year you must be gathering information and reacting to it. So, during the past six years have you been supplying the families of the deceased with information? I would like to ask the Foreign Minister to answer.

Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura:

So you do not want to ask any more about how we confirmed the deaths of Japanese but want to know about reports to the victims families? We provided the families with information about the bodies and about compensation funds. Also, for the 13 Japanese whose remains we found, we helped the families deal with the bodies. We also financial support visits to the World Trade Center site for the families on every anniversary.

Mr. Fujita:

Since I do not have much time I would like to ask about the suspicious information being uncovered and the doubts people world wide are having about the events of 911. Many of these doubters are very influential people. In such circumstances I believe the Japanese government, which claims the attacks were carried out by Al Qaeda, should be providing the victims families with this new information. In that context I would like to ask several questions.

First of all I would like to get all members of the committee to look at this panel and look at the pictures I have provided you with. This is concrete evidence in the form of photographs and other types of information. The first photograph has computer graphics attached to show how large the plane that hit the Pentagon was. A 757 is quite a large airplane with a width of 38 meters. So as you can see even though such a large plane hit the pentagon there is only a hole that is too small for the airplane. This is a photograph taken of firemen at work and you can also see there is no damage of the sort an airplane that large should make. I would also like you to look at the lawn in front and notice that there are no airplane parts on it. Let us now look at the third picture, which is also of the pentagon taken from a U.S. TV news report has captions that show the roof of the Pentagon is still intact. Again even though a huge airplane is supposed to have hit, there is not enough corresponding damage. Now let us move to the next photograph. Here is a photograph of a hole, as Minister Komura knows the Pentagon is a very strong building with many walls. Yet the airplane has pierced them. But as you know, airplanes are made of the lightest possible material. An airplane made of such light material could not make a hole like that. Next I would like to show a photograph of how the airplane hit the building. The airplane made a U-turn, avoiding the Defense Secretary's office and hitting the only part of the Pentagon that had been specially reinforced to withstand a bomb attack.

Also, in the middle of page five we have a comment from a U.S. airforce official. He says I have flown the two types of airplane used on 911 and I cannot believe it would be possible for someone who is flying one for the first time to be able to carry out such a maneuver. Also, as you know, they have not recovered the flight recorders from most of these 4 airplanes. Also, there were more than 80 security cameras at the Pentagon but they have refused to release almost all of the footage. In any case, as you have just seen there is no picture of the airplane or of its wreckage in any of these photographs. It is very strange that no such pictures have been shown to us.

As you know Japan's self-defense forces have their headquarters in Ichigaya. Can you imagine if an airplane hit a major city, if an hour and a half after an airplane hit New York that an airplane could hit the Pentagon? In such a situation how could our allies allow such an attack to take place. I would like the Defense Minister to answer this.

Defense Minister Fuyushiba Ishiba:

I have not prepared so I will have to answer ad-lib. If such a situation took place then the airforce would send fighters up to shoot down any airplanes. This is what happened with an attack on the German constitutional court. In the case of Japan our reaction would depend on what kind of airplane it was, who was flying it and what their purpose was. However, according to our laws it might be hard to order an airplane to be shot down just because it was flying at a low level. We would probably have self-defense forces fly with it and ask for a cabinet decision. Since an airplane would have many people on board we would have do discuss what to do. This happened a long time ago but a Cesna airplane was flown into the house of a person called Yoshio Kodama. There was also an All Japan Airways flight bound for Hakodate that was hijacked and had the pilot killed. It would be best if such a thing never happened but we need to prepare new laws for such situations and discuss them in Parliament.

Mr. Fujita:

Since we are running out of time I would like to present a new piece of evidence. Please look at this panel. The first picture is one you see often of the two towers that were hit by hijacked airplanes. I could understand if this happened right after the airplanes hit but here we can see large piece of material flying a large distance through the air. Some flew 150 meters. You can objects flying in this picture as if there was an explosion. Here is a picture I took from a book. This lets you see how far the objects flew. The third picture is of a fireman who was involved in the rescue talking about a series of explosions in the building that sounded like a professional demolition. We cannot present video today so I have written a translation of what the fireman said. Here his is saying "it went boom boom boom like explosions were going off."

Here is something said by a Japanese research team of officials from the fire department and the construction ministry. The interviewed a Japanese survivor who said that while she was fleeing there were explosions. This testimony appears in a report prepared with the aid of the construction ministry and the fire department. Now I would like you to see the following picture. Normally it is said that the twin towers collapsed because they were hit by airplanes. However, one block away from the twin towers is building number 7. It can be seen in the following map a block away from the WTC. This building collapsed 7 hours after the WTC buildings were attacked. If I could show you a video it would be easy to understand but take a look at this photograph. This is a 47 story building that fell in this manner (He drops and object to demonstrate). The building falls in five or six seconds. It is about the same speed as an object would fall in a vacuum. This building falls like something you would see in a Kabuki show. Also if falls while keeping its shape. Remember it was not hit by an airplane. You have to ask yourself if a building could fall in that manner due to a fire after 7 hours. Here we have a copy of the 911 commission report. This is a report put out by the U.S. government in July of 2004 but this report does not mention the collapse of the building I just described. It is not mentioned at all in here (he waves the book). FEMA also issued a report but they also fail to mention this building. Many people believe, especially after seeing the story about building number 7, that something is strange. Since this is an incident where many people died people think is should be investigated.

We are running out of time but I would also like to mention the put options. Just before the 911 attacks, ie on September 6th, 7th and 8th there were put options put out on the stocks of the two airlines United and American that were hit by hijackers. There were also put options on Merril Lynch, one of the biggest WTC tenants. In other words somebody had insider information and made a fortune selling put options of these stocks. The head of Germany's Bundesbank at the time, who is equivalent to the Governor of the Bank of Japan, said there are lots of facts to prove the people involved in the terror attacks profited from insider information. He said there was lots of suspicious trading involving financial companies etc prior to the attacks. The had of the Bundesbank was willing to say this much. I would like to ask the Finance Minster about these put options. Did the government of Japan know about this, and what do you think about this? I would like to ask Finance Minister Nukaga about this.

Finance Minister Fukushiro Nukaga:

I was in Burkina Fasso in Africa when I heard about this incident. I decided to fly immediately to the U.S. but when I got to Paris I was told there were no flights to America. So I only heard what was reported later about the facts. I know there have been reports about the points you raise. So we made it obligatory that people provide ID for securities transactions and for suspicious transactions to be reported and we made it a crime to provide money to terrorist organizations. We believe the international financial system should not be abused. In any case, terrorism is a horrible thing and must be condemned. This type of terrorism cannot be stopped by one country but needs to be stopped by international society.

Mr. Fujita:

I would like to ask finance specialist Mr. Asao to tell me about put options. A group of people with large amounts of money, clear insider information and financial expertise would have been necessary for such a thing to take place. Could a few terrorists in Afghanistand and Pakistan carry out such a sophisticated and large scale set of transactions? I would like to ask Mr. Asao to respond.

Keiichiro Asao:

I understand put options are a deal to sell stocks at a fixed price. In this case somebody must have had insider information to carry out such transactions because nobody could normally predict these airlines would have their planes hijacked. So, I believe this was certainly a case of insider trading.

Mr. Fujita:

Prime Minister, you were Chief Cabinet Secretary at the time and as somebody has already noted, this was an incident of the sort that humanity had never previously experienced. Also, there appears to be a lot more information about this incident coming out now than came out in the months after the attacks. Now that we are an internet and visual society, this information is being made public so if we look at the situation now, the whole starting point for these two laws , the start of the war on terror itself, as you have seen from the information I have presented, has not been properly investigated or analyzed. So I do not believe the government has acted properly by investigating this incident or asking the U.S. government for an explanation. So far we have not started refueling U.S. ships yet so I think we need to go back to the beginning and not just simply and blindly trust the U.S. government explanation and indirect information provided by them. There were too many victims so I think we need to start again from the beginning. We need to ask who the real victims of this war on terrorism are. I think the citizens of the world are its victims. Here in Japan we have disappearing pensions and disappearing records about victims of Hepatitis C contaminated blood but everything I have presented on facts and confirmable evidence. Let us talk about the vanishing black boxes, vanishing airplanes and vanishing remains. Also lots of the remains of these buildings have disappeared. Even FEMA says that prevented it from carrying out a proper investigation. We need to look at this evidence and ask ourselves what the war on terrorism really is. I can see the ministers nodding in agreement but I would like to ask Prime Minister Fukuda. Please look at me. I have heard that when you were Chief Cabinet Minister at the time you felt many strange things about these attacks. Do you not think it was strange?

Prime Minister Fukuda:

I never said I thought it was strange.

Mr. Fujita:

Prime Minister what about the origin of the war on terror and the idea of whether it is right or wrong to participate in it? Is there really a reason to participate in this war on terror? Do we really need to participate? I would also like to ask about how to really stop terrorism.

Prime Minister Fukuda:

We believe based on evidence provided to us by the U.S. government that the attacks of 911 were carried out by Al Qaeda. We need to put an end to Al Qaeda terrorism. That is why international society is united in the fight against terrorism. Here, concerning a law passed by the Democratic Party last year and based on UN resolution 16595. This is a resolution passed in response to the terrorist attacks on the U.S. So you passed the law agreeing with the UN didn't you?

Mr Fujita:

Did you confirm about the bodies and the facts behind the resolution because that is why you claim to be participating in this war on terrorism. So I believe to end terrorism we need to pass a law that actually helps the people of Afghanistan. I would like Mr. Inuzuka to talk about the law and about the fight against terrorism.

Tadashi Inuzuka:

Among the many problems raised by MP Fujita the thing we need to worry most about is that the people in Afghanistan can live in peace and without worries. That is the core of the issue of ending terrorism. Without discussing this but just operating behind the back lines by supplying oil and not thinking about the entire situation or the people involved it is nonsense to debate this law. This law should be made for peace and security in Afghanistan. Our country needs to pass a real anti-terror law.

Posted by: Omega892R09 Jan 14 2008, 09:47 AM

QUOTE (bill @ Jan 14 2008, 08:38 AM)
Transcript Of Japanese
Parliament's 911 Testimony
From Benjamin Fulford

The links broke, this should work:

Posted by: dv8 Jan 14 2008, 10:17 AM

Well I give Mr. Fugita all the credit for at least bringing up the basics of all the discrepencies of 911, but there is so much more damning evidence than what appears to be a synopsis of events after watching LC2. Hopefully it will at least get the ball rolling within the international community for other leaders to step up and ask questions as well. Apperantly their leaders in Japan have more courage to ask questions than those here in the US of our Congress. Shamefull really..

Posted by: georgie101 Jan 14 2008, 10:41 AM

Well done Mr Fujita.
It can't have been easy to have done this.

Posted by: Carl Bank Jan 14 2008, 10:54 AM

QUOTE (georgie101 @ Jan 14 2008, 04:41 PM)
Well done Mr Fujita.
It can't have been easy to have done this.

Certainly not, Georgie. I, for one, would have definetely failed -
It is -after all- hard enough for me to follow the 9/11 issues in
english, but explaining it to newbies in Japanese? No way.

kudos to Mr. Fujita for being brave and for his great lenguage skills from: Carl

Posted by: georgie101 Jan 14 2008, 10:58 AM

QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Jan 14 2008, 02:54 PM)
Certainly not, Georgie. I, for one, would have definetely failed -
It is -after all- hard enough for me to follow the 9/11 issues in
english, but explaining it to newbies in Japanese? No way.


Posted by: rob balsamo Jan 14 2008, 11:52 AM

QUOTE (bill @ Jan 14 2008, 08:38 AM)
Prime Minister Fukuda:

We believe based on evidence provided to us by the U.S. government that the attacks of 911 were carried out by Al Qaeda.

.....and herein lies the rub. If anyone reads nothing else of the above transcript, the quote in this post explains everything.

One thing that really bothers me is why would any international community/leader take the current US Govt at their word, when most amercians do not.

Nice job Mr. Fujita, you are only hitting the tip of the Iceberg, but good start. Much respect.

Sanders, try to get our press releases to Mr Fujita as soon as you can....


Posted by: Sanders Jan 14 2008, 12:13 PM

QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Jan 15 2008, 12:52 AM)
Sanders, try to get our press releases to Mr Fujita as soon as you can....

I sent an e-mail to his office via the only address I could find, and posted the same text on his official blog as well in two different threads pertaining to his presentation. You can view my post here, it's the second comment from the top, the long one dated 2008/01/14:

My Japanese isn't perfect, but good enough I think. Anyway he has the links to the press release, the P4T front page, and the member list, and an explanation in Japanese of what the press release says, point by point - I emphasized that this is based on data released by the NTSB.

I'm comforted by the fact that my blog comments didn't appear right away, it took about a day to be added. That means someone is reviewing the posts before they add them to the blog.

Also, I am going to a party later in the month being thrown by someone who works in the government - look forward to talking to him.

Hopefully this 'll do it. I'm convinced that the AA77 FDR evidence is the most incontrovertable info out there, simply because it's the US government's own data. Hopefully that point won't be lost on councillor Fujita's staff and this will get to him.

Kudos to you Rob, for all the work you did. Maybe this opportunity will result in the FDR evidence seeing the light of day finally!

Posted by: rob balsamo Jan 14 2008, 12:37 PM

thumbsup.gif salute.gif

Posted by: amazed! Jan 14 2008, 06:44 PM

Good for Fujita. I hope something comes of it. It appears he may have received a better welcome in the Japanese parliament than a congressman in the US congress would have received bringing up the same subject matter.

Posted by: chris sarns Jan 15 2008, 04:28 AM

Thank you Sanders, Rob and Mr. Fujita

God willing, this will make it to the international press.

thumbsup.gif cheers.gif



Posted by: LizzyTish Jan 15 2008, 06:37 AM

He cerrtainly went out there 'locked and loaded'. He was well prepared with his charts and clips, etc. It obviously wasn't spur of the moment. thumbsup.gif

Posted by: Ningen Jan 15 2008, 03:45 PM

This translation is quite good, but I have found one important mistake, which has ended up in subtitled videos, as I discuss here:

Mr. Fulford has done hard and very skilled work, and I really appreciate it. Mistakes are inevitable, and this may be the only one. I encourage people to wait a little longer. I was hoping that the party might release an official certifified translation, but this is moving quickly, which I understand and don't want to impede. A day or two more before this goes to the press seems warranted, given the importance of this story. Journalists would want a certified translation, I would think.

Sanders, reading that comment, your Japanese is great. Want to divide up the videos and check the subtitles against the Japanese? Maybe if we both check then we have at least four people involved.

Jazzdicekey has done a Japanese transcription, which is very useful for easy and accurate translation:

But it is not complete and appears be in different order and maybe cover different tapes than Mr. Fulford's translation.

Posted by: chris sarns Jan 15 2008, 08:53 PM

I read somewhere that there would be a news conference that US MSM tried and failed to stop.

Has it taken place yet?

Posted by: Devilsadvocate Jan 16 2008, 06:03 AM

QUOTE (LizzyTish @ Jan 15 2008, 05:37 AM)
He cerrtainly went out there 'locked and loaded'. He was well prepared with his charts and clips, etc. It obviously wasn't spur of the moment. thumbsup.gif

...Locked, loaded- and has he got an AIM !

The answers he got to his questions are interesting...

Q: "Could the insider-trading have been carried out by terrorists in Afghanistan?"

A: "...In my expert opinion, it was definitely a case of insider-trading !"

"That question is so good- we really shouldn't wreck it with an answer !")

The defense minister looked more than a bit thoughtful, though.
Must have thought some thoughts of his own before... wink.gif

Posted by: Sanders Jan 16 2008, 06:59 AM

QUOTE (Ningen @ Jan 16 2008, 04:45 AM)
Want to divide up the videos and check the subtitles against the Japanese? Maybe if we both check then we have at least four people involved.

Thanks, Ningen. Personally I don't know what the point would be in nitpicking Mr. Fulford's translation, seems to me the jist of the story is out there now, I think time would be better spent spreading this news around as much as possible. But if you'd like for me to check part of the work I'd be happy to do it.

Posted by: rob balsamo Jan 16 2008, 07:21 AM

I agree with you Sanders,

However, strict accuracy is perhaps of utmost concern in this circumstance. Teamwork is key as none of us have the budget to inquire for a professional translation. We work as a team within the Patriot Community. If the dispute turns into something unnecessarily extensive, borderline hostile or a distraction from the big picture, its a good way to expose the "neutralizers".

Let this be a warning to those attempting such...


Posted by: Devilsadvocate Jan 16 2008, 01:45 PM

Well- Waddaya know.... laugh.gif

BTW- This is the man's homepage;
I used a translation-program to get some idea of what's written there-
the translation came out pretty rough, but I think that entire page is devoted to a long list of people who have a lot of doubts... thumbsup.gif

Posted by: Sanders Jan 16 2008, 03:37 PM

Regarding the translation that Mr. Fulford did, I re-watched all 8 parts of the video with his translation today. I think it's fine.

The translation is not a "direct translation" of everything Fujita is saying, but that would be pointless. Japanese is a peculiar language, with no correllation to English. Fulford's translation is straightforward and a little rough ... you might think watching this, "did he really translate everything that guy just said!???" Yes, he did, in a general but adequate way IMO, but without all the baggage. Kudos to Mr. Fulford for doing this.

Secondly, there is an article at Prison Planet which states that in this Japanese presentation someone discussed the possibility of arresting president Bush (in Japan?) for 9/11 crimes. I have found no such language, or anything remotely close to it, in any of the 8 part video I have watched twice now. Maybe there's some part of this presentation I haven't seen. But I think it's more likely that someone over at Prison Planet is exaggerating again.

Posted by: chris sarns Jan 20 2008, 05:18 AM

QUOTE (chris sarns @ Jan 15 2008, 07:53 PM)
I read somewhere that there would be a news conference that US MSM tried and failed to stop.

Has it taken place yet?


Posted by: amazed! Jan 20 2008, 03:56 PM


That is cool that you know Japanese! Can you read it too? Is it necessary to be able to read it?

My ex could speak Greek, but she could not read it.

Posted by: Sanders Jan 20 2008, 04:18 PM

My reading/writing is OK. Don't study much anymore tongue.gif

Posted by: Ningen Jan 23 2008, 10:11 PM

This was never nitpicking or a dispute. Mr. Fulford's translation was generally quite good, and I appreciate him translating it. I've been concerned that the legislative context was not adequately explained, because of a mistake in translation. The German poster of the videos made a change to the subtitles that addressed my concern.

I don't agree that this is a language issue. This is dry logical talk in the legislature and it can be translated. It's an issue of how complete and accurate you want it. Saying it is good enough and better to get it out is a perfectly valid view.

Another change I requested, and I think was made to the subtitles, was this:

The subtitles based on this translation had Fujita stating "What I want to know is if this event was caused by Al Qaeda or not." What he really said was "What I want to know is if this event was caused by Al Qaeda, or by Al Qaeda only." That's an important difference - he's considering more possibilities.

It's moot now - the translation is out and like I said it's generally quite good. When I get around to it I will translate the transcript which has some additional content on the political context.

I maintain that the comments at the beginning about a press conference and failed emails should not have been included with the transcript.

Posted by: Carl Bank Jan 24 2008, 02:01 PM

QUOTE (amazed! @ Jan 20 2008, 09:56 PM)
My ex could speak Greek, but she could not read it.

Thats intersting. My ex couldn't do french, but she could speak, read and write it.

Posted by: Ningen Jan 26 2008, 05:45 PM

New subtitled videos:

I've only watched part 1. It's perfect as far as I could see.

Thanks to Chihaya from Australia Truth.

Posted by: Sanders Jan 27 2008, 01:43 PM

Cool !

Thanks for posting that, Ningen. I read your above post, and I agree. Many subtleties can be overlooked when translating from Japanese to English. I haven't watched the new batch yet, but I'm glad someone took the time to do it more thoroughly.

thumbsup.gif cheers.gif

Powered by Invision Power Board (
© Invision Power Services (