Lloyde England & His Taxi Cab- The Eye Of The Storm, now released Options

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Get ready for an intense and surreal journey with Lloyde the cab driver while he is confronted by CIT with the north side evidence.

Watch and listen to his reaction with input from his FBI employee wife who he married after 9/11 but was seeing at the time.

See exclusive footage and images of the actual cab as it is today preserved on his 30 acres of property in the woods of Virginia.

Be prepared for an extremely engaging yet disturbing experience.

Home page
high quality megavideo version
lower quality google video version

[Obwon]

Okay, let me be clear, I don't expect Craig to get involved with this "mind control" speculation, it's not presented for him to do that. Nor is it a practical or even necessary
item in the investigation. However, "we" readers, seeking answers with our resources,
have the liberty of doing the "armchair analysis" and it goes without saying that many
times it does bear fruit. So we work with the "loose ends" to see where they lead.
Maybe we can come to some acceptable conclusions or maybe we can't. Or maybe
someone else is inspired to pick up a piece here and use it on another part of the story.
We have our "investigators" and we have our "speculators" and that is as it should be.
As long as the speculators stick with the facts provided by the investigators,
they add, rather than subtract from the effort.

Craig has done a pretty well bang up job for his part, on some pretty complex
material. So kudos again to Craig and Crew.


CIT said: "They likely told him to talk to media and be a face of the event and may have informed him that he would be considered a hero of sorts by virtually everyone."

But no! "They" don't operate that way at all! At that stage of the operation, the
actual way things will "play out" can't be known. So, everything must be treated
as "sensitive", meaning that "co operators" can not be allowed to know anything
critical, else they have to be "made unavailable". This we know from the widely
held suspicion that people involved in other areas, where critical kinds of knowledge
could not be contained or denied, either have "fatal accidents" or commit "suicide",
exactly as we'd expect when considering the knowledge they most likely would
have had.

We can also make an educated guess, that "insiders" would have to be compensated
in some self incriminating way that ensures their complete and utter silence. Or,
if that's not possible, or if the "price" of silence is such that it cannot be assured,
then that person has to be "made unavailable", by various irrevocable means.

So the fact that Lloyd is not "made unavailable" suggests that he knows nothing
of any real "value" as far as "climbing back up the tree". How this comes about,
is where the speculation about mind control, which is real, comes forward as a
very possible answer.

-------------------------------AN ASIDE-------------------------------
Tautology:

For example take the just finished Wiener case. Let's just build a quick
and dirty hypothetical to demonstrate how artifacts could convene his
conduct. Let's say he'd discovered (which mind control subjects sometimes
do,) that he has been a victim of such.

His votes on foreign policy, may not have been what he had envisioned
himself doing, but; by the time he discovered he'd been doing antithetical
things, he's done so many he can't then claim mind control as the source.
He can't resign office, he'd be ordered to withdraw it. The only thing he
can do is destroy himself and so that's what he does.
Otherwise he'd continue to be used.
-------------------------------END ASIDE-------------------------------

Meaning for Lloyd would be that there's no way out of his "box".
For sure he's lying and knows something, that much Craig has
locked down! What the reason behind all this prevarication is,
is curious, since he obviously knows nothing of importance about
those "above him", nor would it be productive to speculate that he
arranged this all by himself, or even with the help of a friend.

The matter of name changes for both him and his wife and the
timing thereof is curious as well. He appears to have amassed
quite some holdings for a cabbie, but money alone does not
ensure secrecy. The answer could be as simple as his ties to
his wife. But that would mean he knows more than he would have
to know, if no form of mind control were employed. But then,
there would be the possibility of him somehow being "broken down",
(accidental death of his wife for example) which would lead us back
to him being made "unavailable". So it's a conundrum that has
interesting possibilities, for MC to explain his conduct.

I don't believe that the lamp pole was ever through the windshield.
Try suspending a 200 lbs lamp pole above the ground and driving
a car into it at 45mph, then examine the damage. I believe that
the order of damage, would be significantly larger in this case,
even though this pole would be standing still, not moving at
some additional velocity, both downwards and horizontally.
Not to mention the abrupt change of direction the cab should
have made upon being hit. Does anyone know if there were
skid marks on the road? I didn't see any. If he hit the breaks,
a common reaction to the windshield breaking suddenly, I'd
expect to see skid marks, even at only 45 mph. The position
of the car seems to say that it "fishtailed" to its final position.
I can't imagine it being driven to that position, with the lamp
pole not moving about.

Braking, I would think, should have dislodged it from the
back seat, and pushed it forward so that it would cantilever
to the ground outside and make significant drag marks. If so,
then any residual motion, would have pushed it through
the roof. So it seems that the damage to the cab was done
elsewhere, then, as some one said before, the car was either
driven or towed into position. Then, with everyone's attention
distracted by the Pentagon explosion, the pole was quickly
placed and glass and debris were strewn about. It could have
been kept in the grass behind the guard rail. One strong man
could then have picked it up and placed it.

It's an incredible wonder that the officials first on the scene, did
not add an official narrative about the cab to the official story,
contemporary with it's discovery. I mean, judging by the speed
at which they grabbed all those videos, you'd expect they'd have
been right on top of this as well.

Obwon

[Craig Ranke CIT]

But no! "They" don't operate that way at all! At that stage of the operation, the
actual way things will "play out" can't be known. So, everything must be treated
as "sensitive", meaning that "co operators" can not be allowed to know anything
critical, else they have to be "made unavailable". This we know from the widely
held suspicion that people involved in other areas, where critical kinds of knowledge
could not be contained or denied, either have "fatal accidents" or commit "suicide",
exactly as we'd expect when considering the knowledge they most likely would
have had.

We can also make an educated guess, that "insiders" would have to be compensated
in some self incriminating way that ensures their complete and utter silence. Or,
if that's not possible, or if the "price" of silence is such that it cannot be assured,
then that person has to be "made unavailable", by various irrevocable means.

So the fact that Lloyd is not "made unavailable" suggests that he knows nothing
of any real "value" as far as "climbing back up the tree". How this comes about,
is where the speculation about mind control, which is real, comes forward as a
very possible answer.

It doesn't seem feasible to me that they would trust someone under mind control to play such a visible and significant role.

He let it slip that he is well aware his neighbor was "up on the bridge" taking pictures of his cab and pole which demonstrates he is truly cognizant of what really happened.

He would have to therefore know how his cab got damaged and the scene was staged.

I don't believe that the lamp pole was ever through the windshield.
Try suspending a 200 lbs lamp pole above the ground and driving
a car into it at 45mph, then examine the damage. I believe that
the order of damage, would be significantly larger in this case,
even though this pole would be standing still, not moving at
some additional velocity, both downwards and horizontally.
Not to mention the abrupt change of direction the cab should
have made upon being hit. Does anyone know if there were
skid marks on the road? I didn't see any. If he hit the breaks,
a common reaction to the windshield breaking suddenly, I'd
expect to see skid marks, even at only 45 mph. The position
of the car seems to say that it "fishtailed" to its final position.
I can't imagine it being driven to that position, with the lamp
pole not moving about.

Braking, I would think, should have dislodged it from the
back seat, and pushed it forward so that it would cantilever
to the ground outside and make significant drag marks. If so,
then any residual motion, would have pushed it through
the roof. So it seems that the damage to the cab was done
elsewhere, then, as some one said before, the car was either
driven or towed into position.

Yes agreed. These are all dubious details about his account that point to staging but it's the witnesses to the
north of the gas station approach who PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that this scene was staged.

Then, with everyone's attention
distracted by the Pentagon explosion, the pole was quickly
placed and glass and debris were strewn about. It could have
been kept in the grass behind the guard rail. One strong man
could then have picked it up and placed it.

Ah but wait a minute I thought you said that "They" don't operate that way at all!

According to your logic the "one strong man" would have to be under mind control too. In fact EVERYONE involved
in executing the operation would have to be under mind control.

It's more comfortable when we can simply say that "They" are the perpetrators and keep everything up in the air. But the information we have provided should be enough to make people realize that it's time to take action because we already have hard proof that the official impact narrative is false. It's a lot more fun to be an "armchair analyst" then to actually do something.

I understand how it's difficult to believe that a seemingly low level asset with a face and a nice demeanor like Lloyde could be willingly involved nor does it really matter one way or the other since obviously he is not responsible for a global psychological crime on the magnitude of 9/11.

But your speculation is not helpful in our efforts to expose the crime.

It obfuscates the facts and contributes to the reason why people are more prone to do NOTHING but sit back and theorize anonymously while leaving the hard work to others.

The perpetrators don't theorize. The media doesn't theorize. They state the lie as FACT over and over to reinforce it into the public's mind and we aren't going to counter a multi-trillion dollar media/propaganda arm with an "armchair analysis".

I suggest that you stick to the facts otherwise I feel you are working AGAINST our efforts by casting doubt and confusing people with constant tales of speculation which only create the impression that we don't have proof and that we should be dismissed as a bunch of "conspiracy theorists".

It's an incredible wonder that the officials first on the scene, did
not add an official narrative about the cab to the official story,
contemporary with it's discovery. I mean, judging by the speed
at which they grabbed all those videos, you'd expect they'd have
been right on top of this as well.

What are you talking about? They used photos and images of the cab and light pole in their propaganda and let Lloyde tell the story to the media numerous times. He most certainly WAS included in the "official narrative" via the media, the Moussaui trial, and other things.

Hell they have pictures of his cab and pole on display inside the Pentagon! In fact John McCain used pictures of his cab as propaganda during the 2008 Republican convention. So yes Lloyde's scene was a MAJOR part of the official narrative.

That's the entire point.

This post has been edited by Craig Ranke CIT: Jun 22 2011, 12:05 PM