IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
911 Footage Shows Fbi Director Asking Firefighters About Secondary Hits On Wtc, -== YouTube ==-

datars
post Oct 28 2010, 07:02 PM
Post #1


New Terrorist in Town


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 997
Joined: 14-August 06
From: S.F. Bay Area
Member No.: 6



911 Footage Shows FBI Director Asking Firefighters About Secondary Hits On WTC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4utd2XP8anw

Video also shows city officials hurriedly leaving after South Tower collapse
Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
Wednesday, Oct 27th, 2010

An intriguing video has appeared on You Tube that appears to show a FDNY film crew being interviewed in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks by the the director of the FBI's New York office, who has suspicions that one of the World Trade Center towers took a "secondary hit" before collapsing.
The video appears to be part of NIST's recent FOIA releases and therefore has not been seen before now.

On first viewing it appears to be nothing special, just the horribly familiar scenes of dust and rubble from the aftermath of the attacks. However, it contains a stunning exchange between officials and firefighters.
The action appears to be taking place immediately after the collapse of the South tower and before the collapse of the North tower.

The film crew exits a building and make their way along the dust and debris littered streets. At around 2 mins 50, a man in a suit approaches the crew and announces himself as "FBI, Barry Mawn." Mawn (pictured below with Rudy Giuliani) was at that time the director of the FBI's New York office.
Mawn then asks the FDNY crew a question in the form of a statement -- "That tower got a secondary hit?" The firefighters respond by saying they are unsure but they heard a rumbling and ran for their lives as the tower then collapsed.

The audio is difficult to hear but one of the firefighters then says he "saw it blow right out the side of the building" to which Mawn asks "that was the plane right?".
The firefighter then states "I don't know if it was a plane or an explosion." As they continue their description of events the noise of a jet overhead interrupts them as people begin to panic. Someone, presumably another FBI agent shouts "is that ours?" to which Mawn replies "yeah that should be ours".
At this point a large gathering of suited individuals walks into view and a woman in the group yells "go to city hall."
Mawn then asks "where is the mayor?", from which it can be deduced that this group is affiliated with Rudy Giuliani and they are hurriedly leaving the scene.
The woman leading the mayor's group then curses at reporters telling them to "get the f*** out of here". One commenter has speculated that the reporters are with Pat Dawson, the first NBC News correspondent to report from the scene of the attacks at the World Trade Center.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paul
post Oct 29 2010, 04:27 AM
Post #2





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 241
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Australia
Member No.: 3,978



QUOTE (datars @ Oct 29 2010, 09:32 AM) *
911 Footage Shows FBI Director Asking Firefighters About Secondary Hits On WTC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4utd2XP8anw

Video also shows city officials hurriedly leaving after South Tower collapse
Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
Wednesday, Oct 27th, 2010

An intriguing video has appeared on You Tube that appears to show a FDNY film crew being interviewed in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks by the the director of the FBI's New York office, who has suspicions that one of the World Trade Center towers took a "secondary hit" before collapsing.
The video appears to be part of NIST's recent FOIA releases and therefore has not been seen before now.

On first viewing it appears to be nothing special, just the horribly familiar scenes of dust and rubble from the aftermath of the attacks. However, it contains a stunning exchange between officials and firefighters.
The action appears to be taking place immediately after the collapse of the South tower and before the collapse of the North tower.

The film crew exits a building and make their way along the dust and debris littered streets. At around 2 mins 50, a man in a suit approaches the crew and announces himself as "FBI, Barry Mawn." Mawn (pictured below with Rudy Giuliani) was at that time the director of the FBI's New York office.
Mawn then asks the FDNY crew a question in the form of a statement -- "That tower got a secondary hit?" The firefighters respond by saying they are unsure but they heard a rumbling and ran for their lives as the tower then collapsed.

The audio is difficult to hear but one of the firefighters then says he "saw it blow right out the side of the building" to which Mawn asks "that was the plane right?".
The firefighter then states "I don't know if it was a plane or an explosion." As they continue their description of events the noise of a jet overhead interrupts them as people begin to panic. Someone, presumably another FBI agent shouts "is that ours?" to which Mawn replies "yeah that should be ours".
At this point a large gathering of suited individuals walks into view and a woman in the group yells "go to city hall."
Mawn then asks "where is the mayor?", from which it can be deduced that this group is affiliated with Rudy Giuliani and they are hurriedly leaving the scene.
The woman leading the mayor's group then curses at reporters telling them to "get the f*** out of here". One commenter has speculated that the reporters are with Pat Dawson, the first NBC News correspondent to report from the scene of the attacks at the World Trade Center.


I think these two men from the FBI know more than people might think they know. Whats does the other FBI agent mean when he says "is that ours?" what was he expecting the second plane to be maybe an international flight from overseas that has been hijacked or something.

Hmmmm very interesting indeed looks like the rabbit hole just keeps getting deeper and deeper and deeper the more we find out.

I think it's time somebody found Mr Barry Mawn and asked him a few questions.

whistle.gif whistle.gif whistle.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Oct 29 2010, 09:50 PM
Post #3





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Interesting stuff! whistle.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paul
post Oct 31 2010, 02:26 PM
Post #4





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 241
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Australia
Member No.: 3,978



QUOTE (amazed! @ Oct 30 2010, 11:20 AM) *
Interesting stuff! whistle.gif


THIS IS VERY SERIOUS STUFF BECAUSE THE FBI DIRECTOR SAID "HE SAW THE BOTTOM OF THE BUILDING BLOW OUT"

I GUESS THE TOWERS MUST HAVE BEEN RIGGED WITH EXPLOSIVES IF THIS IS WHAT HE SAW HAPPEN.

whistle.gif whistle.gif whistle.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Oct 31 2010, 03:08 PM
Post #5





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Yes, the towers were rigged with explosives. The only question is whodunnit? rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
michael72
post Nov 12 2010, 03:04 AM
Post #6





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 73
Joined: 30-June 09
Member No.: 4,447



Whodunnit? See my post about Dr Alan Sabrosky.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
aerohead
post Nov 12 2010, 04:05 AM
Post #7





Group: Core Member
Posts: 327
Joined: 13-July 09
From: State of Heightened Awareness
Member No.: 4,476



We could ask Barry Jennings,
but he's dead now.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tnemelckram
post Nov 12 2010, 04:23 AM
Post #8





Group: Contributor
Posts: 767
Joined: 30-January 08
Member No.: 2,690



Hi All!

I'm with Amazed when he asks Whodunnit? I have my doubts that this question will ever be answered. But in the big picture of history, answering the question does not seem important to our work here.

The first and ideal result would be an impartial investigation that not only trashes the OCT, but also replaces it with a new Truth that not only establishes what happened instead, but also establishes the actual perps and brings them to justice while they are still alive. Fat chance of that!

The second , less ideal and/or likely result would be an impartial investigation some years from now that not only trashes the OCT, but also replaces it with a new Truth that also establishes what happened instead and also identifies the actual perps, but cannot bring them to justice because they are now dead. That might happen because those with an interest in protecting themselves from justice are no longer alive to influence or obstruct the investigation.

The third, less satisfactory , but somewhat more likely result would be an impartial investigation in the near future that both trashes the OCT and replaces it with a new Truth that establishes what happened instead. Unfortunately, the actual perps cannot be identified and brought to to justice because they are either: (a) still alive to influence or obstruct the investigation; or (b) the trail leading to their accountability has gone cold due to: (i) lapse of time, and/or:(ii) spoliation of evidence.

The fourth, even less satisfactory , but still more likely result would be no impartial investigation at all. However, our work nonetheless proves sufficient to not only trash the OCT in the long term judgment of history, but causes historians replace it with a new Truth about what happened instead. Unfortunately, the actual perps would only be suspects in this judgment of history. I think we are well along the path toward trashing the OCT for purposes of history in this manner.

The fifth, most likely as things stand now, but dog's breakfast result would be that there is no impartial investigation, but our work is just enough to trash the OCT in the long term judgment of history. Unfortunately, we also fail to develop enough evidence for historians to satisfactorily replace it with a definitive new Truth of what happened instead, let alone who the likely perps were. I think we have already cast enough doubt upon, and indeed trashed, the OCT enough to discredit it in the judgment of historians to this extent.

IMHO, the fourth and fifth results above are enough to justify our past and continuing work. The assholes who did this and those who did not but whose interests are best served by continuing the OCT are the kind of people who care about how history judges them. They don't just care about getting away with it while still alive, they also want to get away with it forever after they are dead. The fourth and fifth results will at least deprive them of this satisfaction. Moreover, those results will still be instructive to our kids and future generations. Right now the problem is that the only record of our work is preserved in very fragile and easily erasable digital form. We have to be sure this it is preserved in some type of hard format so it ill still be available to historians 10, 25, 50 or even 100 years from now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Nov 12 2010, 10:18 AM
Post #9





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Just to keep things in perspective here, Dubya just released his 'memoir' book, and in it he admits, AGAIN, that he violated US statutes and international law. Nothing will come of it.

So it's safe to say that even if they found a person who admitted to the attacks of 11 September, nothing will come of it.

The rule of law in this country applies only to ordinary people.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeS29
post Nov 15 2010, 03:00 AM
Post #10





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 11
Joined: 23-March 10
From: Left Coast U.S.A.
Member No.: 4,978



The link the OP posted is busted. YouTube yanked it. Anyone have another link?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Carl Bank
post Nov 15 2010, 10:40 AM
Post #11





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,114
Joined: 21-October 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 121



QUOTE (MikeS29 @ Nov 15 2010, 09:00 AM) *
The link the OP posted is busted. YouTube yanked it. Anyone have another link?


Yep: "This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
onesliceshort
post Nov 15 2010, 11:42 AM
Post #12



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Nov 15 2010, 03:40 PM) *
Yep: "This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement."


Is this the video Carl?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7Ecu-i-oLI

OSS
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
WhisperingWnd
post Sep 7 2011, 12:15 PM
Post #13





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 21
Joined: 22-January 10
Member No.: 4,858



QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Nov 15 2010, 09:40 AM) *
Yep: "This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement."



Never too late for an update smile.gif Found 2 Clips under different accounts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTdj2WcDbGA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3FUBytrScA...feature=related

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th September 2019 - 11:55 PM