Tsa Groping 6 Year Old Girl - America Is Finished Options

[Quest]

WTF??!!!!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba030UmbkCo

[rob balsamo]

It is only a matter of time before a Father pulls out his Revolver and ends the madness.

It just may be the new (and perhaps long awaited) shot heard around the world.

[albertchampion]

that will not be happening. the air-traveling public embraces this level of scrutiny. that is what the few who oppose it fail to understand. by and large, the public considers all infringements of their liberties tolerable as long as they think those procedures, infringements, are intended to keep those terrorist mooooslims at bay.

anytime you question how the german nation invigorated adolf and his gang, look in the usa mirror.

i remember vividly being identified as a commie in the 1950's, 1960's because i opposed the usa garrison state and the cold war. there were a few who wore the uniforms of the us military in ww2 who understood. but then there were those sunshine patriots, who ducked military service. those were the boyz who saw any who dissented as commies. probably making up for their scheming to duck military service in ww2, korea.

as a closing note, i really was, am, will always be an opponent of the usa's militarist regimes.

[bill]

Now that was weird


I was posting this

"what kind of drug test

pee in a cup?

this is beyond sick

You are right on target about the US mirroring NAZI Germany, Albert

Naomi Wolf called it years ago"

(then I did a google search for Naomi Wolf to get her steps to fascism

went to Naomi Wolf. org (I think) immediately a malware download started

fortunately I was quick to recognize it and stopped it with task manager -- I think this was the one that trashed a previous computer -- it starts with "your computer may be at risk" and if you close the window it starts the download. -- Apparently They don't want us to read Naomi Wolf


eta

now I have to go run my spyware scans

This post has been edited by bill: Apr 13 2011, 10:03 AM

[André]

...and yet Israeli intelligence which provided security at the Amsterdam Airport, let the crotch bomber board a plane without a passport or luggage in spite of objections from the boarding staff...

[GroundPounder]

It is only a matter of time before a Father pulls out his Revolver and ends the madness.

It just may be the new (and perhaps long awaited) shot heard around the world.

and if i were on the jury, i would acquit the guy w/o thinking twice about it!
this would/could never have happened in the us in the 50's.. that generation would not have put up with it. actually, it would have been unthinkable to allow a stranger to grope a 6 yr old. time will tell how this plays out.... if i were a betting man, i would say blood.

[tam]

What's with the drug test?

[Ricochet]

What's with the drug test?

It's creeping fascism, get used to it since no one (not enough) is fighting back against it. If you wear the wrong t-shirt you will get questioned, read the wrong book or literature (especially anything in Arabic) will get you banned from flying (soon any mode of transportation). The TSA has already questioned passengers disembarking from an Amtrack Train... let that sink in, GETTING OFF the fuckin thing. Pedestrians are next. That's right, TSA to use backscatter x ray machines on the public at large. America, your time has truely come for "papers please".

http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011...ain-passengers/

http://blog.tsa.gov/2011/02/screening-of-p...t-savannah.html

[GroundPounder]

It's creeping fascism, get used to it since no one (not enough) is fighting back against it. If you wear the wrong t-shirt you will get questioned, read the wrong book or literature (especially anything in Arabic) will get you banned from flying (soon any mode of transportation). The TSA has already questioned passengers disembarking from an Amtrack Train... let that sink in, GETTING OFF the fuckin thing. Pedestrians are next. That's right, TSA to use backscatter x ray machines on the public at large. America, your time has truely come for "papers please".

http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011...ain-passengers/

http://blog.tsa.gov/2011/02/screening-of-p...t-savannah.html

when your number is up...speaking of numbers, have you ever done the math? i mean, really, there is less than a 30 rd clip of the baddies per whatever. does that not scare the bureaucrats? i mean seriously, if i were employed by the tsa (or other alphabet soup agency), would the thought not occur to me that BAM , game over? think 2nd amendment and the WILL to exercise it. too bad for you canucks, being members of the 'commonwealth' and such. your allegiance lies where?

[Ricochet]

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn had it right:

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward."

We are a million to one against TPTB. And we still have (for now) real firearms. And yet most live in fear, 10 years on 3 wars and trillions spent on keeping the fear alive.

[GroundPounder]

i think what is happening is the resistance is not being reported and if it is, it is being cast in a negative light. remember, they own the lame stream media.

[albertchampion]

bill,

i think you may have meant NAOMI KLEIN. author of THE SHOCK DOCTRINE.

[rob balsamo]

[mrodway]

Naomi Wolf did come up with the 10 steps to fascism list...

1. Invoke a terrifying internal and external enemy
2. Create a gulag
3. Develop a thug caste
4. Set up an internal surveillance system
5. Harass citizens' groups
6. Engage in arbitrary detention and release
7. Target key individuals
8. Control the press
9. Dissent equals treason
10. Suspend the rule of law
full article:- http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/apr/24/usa.comment

(BTW I haven't had problems with malware since I ditched the pre-installed NWO operating system and installed Linux)

[bill]

Naomi Wolf did come up with the 10 steps to fascism list...



(BTW I haven't had problems with malware since I ditched the pre-installed NWO operating system and installed Linux)

thank you

we are no doubt at #10

[albertchampion]

sent it to the wrong space.

my bad, i confused the naomis. though the wolf and the klein both think similarly.

mea culpa.

sorry.

[tumetuestumefais...]

recently I've had an edit war at Wikipedia to get from there this legal nonsenses:

"Though screening measures are seen as controversial by some, searches conducted at airports are [[consent searches]]. All TSA checkpoints are posted as areas where persons are subject to search. Once an individual sends his property through the x-ray machine and steps through the metal detector (or Advanced Imaging Technology unit), the individual has consented to screening and possible search. Subsequently, the Fourth Amendment no longer applies as a warrant is not needed to search a person if the person gives his or her consent to be searched. The federal government can refuse any individual the ability to board a commercial aircraft if the individual refuses to consent to a search."

Link to edit history.

I was trying to post there quite an opposite legal view sourced in court precedents, statutes and Wikipedia itself:

The screening measures are seen as controversial, because although the searches conducted at airports are regarded by some as consent searches, the travelers are clearly coerced into allowing to be searched, because they have no other choice than either agree to be searched if they want to exercise their liberty to travel or if they do not consent to be searched they are in all cases indiscrimimnately and forcibly denied proceeding to board their flight, mostly without any reason and warrant even detained and escorted outside the airport or even threatened to be arrested. "Where there is coercion there cannot be consent" - as flatly stated the US Supreme Court in Bumper v. North Carolina[112]. All TSA checkpoints are posted as areas where persons are subject to search, however this doesn't necessarily make the searches there reasonable - which is the conditio sine qua non for a search to be legal and which must be warranted as upheld by the US Supreme Court majority[113]. Unconsented search needs a reasonable warrant. In order for such a warrant to be considered reasonable, it must be supported by probable cause and be limited in scope according to specific information supplied by a person (usually a law enforcement officer) who has sworn by it and is therefore accountable to the issuing court[114]. Once an individual sends his property through the x-ray machine and steps through the metal detector (or Advanced Imaging Technology unit), the individual is regarded by TSA as consenting to screening and possible search. It is alleged that the Fourth Amendment then no longer applies, because a warrant is not needed to search a person if the person gives his or her consent to be searched. However such a consent would be only valid if not being coerced and the search would be only reasonable if a reasonable warrant for it is present. There is no authority given to the federal government by the US Constitution to refuse an individual the ability to board a commercial aircraft if the individual refuses to consent to an unreasonable unwarranted search in violation of the Fourth Amendment, however such is the practice of the TSA. Such an organized, extensive and persistent practice against the right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches is most probably the perpetration of the federal capital crime Conspiracy against rights under 18 USC §241[115] punishable even by death penalty, because it results in many deaths[116]. Yet it still awaits to be prosecuted.

Link to edit history whre the sources are linked.

This was almost immediately deleted as "original research" despite it was sourced and moreover the absolutely unsourced original legal nonsenses contradicting laws and precedents were restored by Ravensfire.

So I deleted it as (WP:OR, no sources whatsoever, highly controversial or downright untrue from legal point of view).

Since then nobody dared there to restore the nonsenses.

A poll: who thinks I'm right with the legal interpretation?

This post has been edited by tumetuestumefaisdubien: Apr 14 2011, 02:25 PM

[Ricochet]

Even more outrageous, those assholes strip search a 3 year old boy!
http://dailybail.com/home/tsa-strip-search...-boy-video.html

[elreb]

While crossing the US-Canada border on his bicycle, a man was stopped by a TSA guard who pointed to two sacks the man had on his shoulders. "What's in the bags?" asked the guard.

"Bull shit," said the Cyclist.

"Get them off - we'll take a look," said the guard.

The Cyclist did as he was told, emptied the bags and proving they contained nothing but bull shit, reloaded the bags, put them on his shoulders and continued across the border.

Two weeks later, the same thing happened. Again the TSA guard demanded to see the two bags, which again contained nothing but bull shit.

This went on every week for six months, until one day the Cyclist with the bull shit bags failed to appear.

A few days later, the TSA guard happened to meet the Cyclist downtown. "Say friend, you sure kept us crazy". "We knew you were smuggling something across the border.

I will not say a word - but what is it you were smuggling?"

The Cyclist answered "Bicycles…asshole”!

[tumetuestumefais...]

"Bicycles…asshole”! [/b]

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)