The Minds Of Strippers And Whores Are Very Telling Options

[paulmichael]

As a prerequisite, it is best that you first read my other post entitled: "Why There's So Much Dishonesty In Gov't (And In the Private Sector, Too)" in this Debates forum.

Years ago, on his talk show, Phil Donahue demonstrated a predilection for the subject of people engaged in the world of adult – how you say – "entertainment."

Of course, because Donahue covered the subject so frequently at the time, the other T.V. talk shows followed suit, so I think that I can say that I have sufficient evidence and sufficient statistical sampling to continue with what I will now present.

Male workers (exotic dancers and man-whores) in the so-called "adult trade" consistently stated during televised interviews that they did what they did for the money.

In contrast, female workers (exotic dancers and whores) in the so-called "adult trade" consistently admitted that they did it FOR THE POWER!

There you have it! The primary motivating force for the female mind is a lust for power, and if you take a closer look at how females behave and operate in the so-called mainstream business world, you'd come to the same conclusion: females do not leave their stripper/whore mentality and their lust for power at the door when they enter any business environment.

Like drug addicts, females are so motivated for their daily "fix" of power that they will go along with just about anything to get it. They crave, crave, crave and seek out power AND position!

Take a closer look at things, and you will very easily agree with me when I say that whenever there is a corrupt male in an environment, he will have no trouble finding and hooking up with at least one more-than-eager female to serve as his accomplice in dirty doings. Once the alliance is solidified, there is synergy formed adding a really big boost to the corruption potential between them.

Moving on…

At this point it is important to cover how females perceive competition and how they address it.

Females are phonies. What would you expect of a creature who spends big bucks on face paint and other accoutrements to come across as something she is not?

And so females will deride competition saying that they are non-competitive and totally altruistic in giving the underdogs of society a break. ABSOLUTLELY FALSE, and I'll expound on this shortly.

The fact of the matter is that females are savagely competitive; the thing is that they will not, because they simply cannot, compete on the basis of performance standards, and so they compete on the basis of the elimination of their competition!

Just take a behind-the-scenes tour of a corporation and check out the realm of a typical female manager; specifically, check out the Motley crew that she claims as her "valued team." Why, that mixed bag of low-quality sociological allies makes the freakish cartoon characters of "The Simpsons" look like high society.

The key phrase above is "sociological allies." Note that I did not say "workers."

The female uses her grossly inferior bunch of sociological allies as a battering ram to eliminate, — that is, to displace — her perceived competition (you) OUT while that consummate phony puts on a false front of being the epitome of benevolence, kindness, and altruism toward the downtrodden of society. BULLSHIT! It's been said that the altruist doesn't care a flea's ass about the downtrodden; the altruist is actually motivated by hatred and resentment of the successful (you).

You may say that you have witnessed fairly high quality White males as part of a female's team, and maybe you are even referring to yourself.

Well, upon closer examination you will see that there is one of two possibilities here: either the White male is the paramour (man-whore) of the female manager servicing the female manager's base after-hours carnal needs or that White male is slated in the female manager's mind for soon-to-be executed exfoliation.

Typically, the female manager is threatened (aren't they all) by White males and would prefer to keep them out at all costs. However, there comes a time when she reaches an impasse, that is, a critical hurdle over which she and her whole inferior crew cannot successfully handle. She will bite the bullet and bring on board a capable White male, and keep him around but only for as long as she suffers the uneasiness of desperation. Once the critical hurdle is no longer an issue, it's "hasta la vista, baby," to the White male who gets tossed aside like a used tampon.

[In the other post, " 1,000+ Governmental Accomplices To 9/11? Sure, Why Not?" I wrote: "On the flip-side of things, just go into a place of employment these days, and put your best foot forward as a model employee, and see what happens to you. You will be treated like the bee that entered the wrong hive. For those of you who do not know what happens to the bee that enters the wrong hive: IT GETS STUNG TO DEATH!"]

Did you ever wonder why, over the years, temp agencies and consulting firms have grown in popularity? It's to legitimize the short term exploitation of White males, and get them out the door ASAP. Similarly, outside law firms and C.P.A. firms are utilized while the in-house people are frequently totally useless (but at least the in-house ones are pleasing to female managers who want to be comfy in a non-threatening environment).

What are the top three things that will set a woman in the workplace berserk side-blinding you with a bolt from out of the blue?

Well, as already noted above, the female feels threatened by a competent White male. Just be highly productive and free of needing hand-holding by a "nurturing" female, and you may be in for an unexpected eruption. (Boy, oh, boy, can they ever be SCREAMERS!)

Secondly, while young females have been noted for being "mean girls" to other girls who are perceived to be prettier then they, the same attitudes and meanness can be directed to certain males who similarly are perceived to be prettier… only the reaction can be even more fiery!

I did not realize it until the movie "Good Hair" came out. I did not see this movie, but I learned about it from previews and interviews on T.V. Females are very sensitive to hair, and while they are envious of looks, I now believe that they can be even more envious of another person's hair. I, in my younger days, had an enviable head of hair, and boy, oh, boy, did I ever get subjected to unprovoked and irrational attacks by females. What else could it have been?

OK, I've covered male competency and looks that set women off in the workplace, so now what is the number one thing about White males that will drive a woman beyond crazy causing her to pull no punches to get a guy like you the hell out?

Well, to repeat, females do not leave their whore mentality at the door when they enter a [ha, ha] "professional" office environment.

Whores will claw, scratch, pull out hair in cat fights with each other TO ELIMINATE THEIR COMPETITION to be pimp daddy's special little bed partner for the night. You see, in this example, again, females do not compete on the basis of performance (which, in this case, would be providing skilled sexual pleasure.)

In the office environment, the female wants to be pimp daddy's favorite (pimp daddy, here, meaning a male superior) and if she perceives that you are making the slightest inroad at gaining favor from her office pimp daddy, she will go absolutely berserk and she will pull no punches in expressing her displeasure and her wanting you out.

You see, the female is a jealous goddess who will tolerate no rivals. And so, you may as well kiss your job, "Goodbye."

So now that I've covered some good ground regarding the mentality and antics of the female in the workplace, here's the question: what do you think of a male manager higher up in the corporate hierarchy who tolerates such shenanigans on the part of his female subordinates? I, personally, don't think much of him, but his kind (and his bevy of whore-minds) are all that you will see in organizations, public and private, these days.

OK, here's a case study of sorts for you: what do you think of George dubya Bush, Chief Executive Officer of the whole country and his appointed subordinate Condoleezza Rice, both of whom served on the day that was designated by the date, September 11, 2001?

Is it any mere coincidence that George dubya was renowned here and abroad as a world class moron? What about Monica Lewinsky who did what she did to be pimp daddy's favorite gal and to maintain her power and influence in the Oval Office? (Hey, I've heard of similar things at Merrill Lynch and elsewhere.)

In another post, a contributor said that in many cases lemmings who go along with things are motivated by desperation.Well, in the case of females, they are motivated by such a lust for position and power that they will do just about everything… ANYTHING for which they are called upon to do. What an amoral bunch! Disagree with me, if you will, but I speaketh the truth! I pull no punches!

I am reminded of the well-publicized case of a very high-ranking female executive at Continental Airlines. Was she ever an out-of-control piece of work on a power trip, so much so, that she really, really, finally had to go. (As I remember, she was in charge of all in-flight services, flight attendants, and, I think flight instructors, too). The only thing rare about this case was that it was well-publicized. For every such case there must be 10,000,000 cases that go unpublicized.

Conclusion: a she-devil's place is in the home.

In the other post, I made the following statement: "all that one need do to totally destroy an empire is to institute government enforced equality."

Now, I am going to make a modified statement, one that is less stringent on one hand, yet more powerful on the other: all that one need do to totally destroy an empire is to institute government enforced equality for just the White females… and for no others.

Paul Michael

[onesliceshort]

You're off your head son.

[paulmichael]

You're off your head son.

A very wise man once said that in a debate he could tell who was the truthteller and who was the liar; the truthteller would attack his opponent's premises; the liar would attack his opponent.

Did I miss something? Onsesliceshort, did you attack any of my premises?

Moving on...

Let's take a closer look at the inner workings of the female brain.

And so, I ask, "Did you ever hear of a mobster having trouble finding a girlfriend? Did you ever hear of a nice guy having trouble finding a girlfriend?"

Let's more closely examine the types of subordinate that female managers favor: the ugly, the stupid, the insane, the obese, the freakish, the scoundrels, the sex pervs, the fagelas, the non-whites, males with female mentality, et al… everything but the capable, upstanding White male.

I've known a female who readily admitted that she relished gossip, especially celebrity dirt, especially dirt on celebrity politicians. Do you think that such a creature will leave her mentality at the door when she goes into a polling place to cast her votes in elections? Don't you think that she will favor candidates who will feed her fodder for gossip to satisfy her lust for such fodder?

I'd say that this is the time, more than ever, for critical thinking. Given the opportunity, females will rip to shreds the fabric of society.

Paul Michael

This post has been edited by paulmichael: Jul 27 2012, 01:40 PM

[paulmichael]

What an amoral bunch!

You'd think that of all people, females would be concerned about the wellbeing of the children of America.

It's a laugh that female T.V. personalities like Kelly Ripa and Carla Hall will go on the air in public service announcements that promote child protection, yet they make themselves parts of bigger enterprises that corrupt the morals of children with very, very objectionable T.V. show content.

Why, during the family hour - THE FAMILY HOUR - you have syndicated reruns of shows like "Two-and-a-Half Men" and "The Simpsons" that contain highly objectionable content, these not to mention reruns of "Family Guy" which is beyond twisted and perverse.

Let me ask you this: do think that maybe, just maybe there is connection between the decline of televised content and the ascent of females up the ranks of broadcasting executive, director, producer, writer, talent agent, literary agent, casting director, actor, and the like?

In addition to the above, let's not forget that in the past, sponsoring companies and ad agencies had a degree of scruples and were very careful about sponsor's image and careful about what T.V. shows had an association with what sponsors. All this appears to have hit the crapper with the ascent of females up the managerial ranks of sponsoring companies and of ad agencies.

Additionally, companies have gone so whole-hog to present appearances of political correctness that they have turned over entire human resource functions to females thus making females the keeper of the gate through which new hires must pass. AND LET ME TELL YOU, IF YOU DON'T CONFORM TO WHAT'S RATTLING AROUND IN A FEMALE'S MIND, YOU WILL NOT BE ADMITTED INTO AN ORGANIZATION. PERIOD!

If you think that the eventualities above have nothing to do with the corrupting content of television, then I have a bridge to Brooklyn that I would like to sell to you.

And so, you have a show like "The Maury Povich Show" featuring a six-year-old girl and a seven-year-old girl, one interested in becoming a stripper, and the other one interested in becoming a whore, and with both of them professing to know all about life. Where do you think these two little girls learned all about life? Why, this was from "The Maury Povich Show," of course! And who works in the background of "The Maury Povich Show?" You guessed it.

Paul Michael P.S. Not only are they an AMORAL bunch, females can be incredibly rotten, callous and ruthless in the business world.

[onesliceshort]

A very wise man once said that in a debate he could tell who was the truthteller and who was the liar; the truthteller would attack his opponent's premises; the liar would attack his opponent.

I'm not attacking you. Just stating the obvious. You need help.

[paranoia]

paul - this topic and how convicted you are to your beliefs are in my opinion (as an admin here at this site) bad news and will only turn ugly (or uglier). you are entitled to your obviously controversial opinions in this specific matter, but not entitled to share them here in what has already proved to be a confrontational manner. frankly, i find this topic to be intentionally inciteful and as such it ends here.