Lawyer Says Bin Laden Did Not Orchestrate 9/11 During Terror Trial Options

[Timothy Osman]

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, February 28th, 2008



Skepticism towards the 9/11 official story reached the Australian Supreme Court this week after a lawyer asserted that the attacks were not orchestrated by Osama bin Laden during the trial of an alleged terror group in Melbourne.

"To say that this was all orchestrated by Osama bin Laden is a silly thing to do. He's never claimed responsibility for it," Remy van de Wiel QC told the Australian jury.
Lawyer Says Bin Laden Did Not Orchestrate 9/11 During Terror Trial
Al-Qaeda leader never claimed responsibility for attack, Van de Wiel tells Australian Supreme Court
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, February 28th, 2008



Skepticism towards the 9/11 official story reached the Australian Supreme Court this week after a lawyer asserted that the attacks were not orchestrated by Osama bin Laden during the trial of an alleged terror group in Melbourne.

"To say that this was all orchestrated by Osama bin Laden is a silly thing to do. He's never claimed responsibility for it," Remy van de Wiel QC told the Australian jury.

Unless you accept the credibility of a dodgy videotape of a fat Bin Laden doppelganger "miraculously discovered" in a house in Jalalabad by U.S. troops and pushed as authentic by the ever-honest U.S. government, then van de Wiel has a point.

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/february2...8_bin_laden.htm

Just goes to show how weak and absurd the Official Conspiracy Theory is when a QC will use it in the defence of someone charged with being a Terrorist.

[lunk]

The OCT (official conspiracy theory)?

It's absolutely ridiculous.

imo, lunk

[Sanders]

OMG, the Emperor has no clothes !

Cool.

I wonder sometimes about all those architects and structural engineers out there designing high-rise buildings, are demands being made of them to design buildings that won't fall down like what happened on 9/11? Does that mean their buildings need to be "demolition proof"? Does everyone know that it's all B.S. and they play some kind of game? I'd sure hate to be an architect with an official-story-believing boss. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

[StevenDC]

This is what throws me: in a trial you are permitted to have all evidence presented in your defense. Any jury that viewed even 1/10th of the available evidence would have an acquittal. Over and over again I keep waiting for some smart defense attorney get this evidence admitted. However, as we all see repeatedly, all the courts find ways around it.

Perhaps P4T can send a dvd to this attorney in Austrailia? I'd love to read those headlines...