Ace Baker Spam, Consolidated from other areas of forum, merged, moved here |
  |
Ace Baker Spam, Consolidated from other areas of forum, merged, moved here |
 Nov 15 2008, 09:56 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988  |
Whether it's the correct engine or not is a bit beside the point. It is definitively proven that no flying object impacted the WTC. If an airplane did hit the south tower, then this thesis must be proven false:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 Good luck. |
 |
 
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 09:58 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988 |
CGI airplanes can go any speed, and survive any maneuver. Pilots, please review the proof of video compositing here:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 10:00 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988 |
CGI airplanes can go any speed without problem. CGI is proven here:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 10:01 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988 |
Yes, the radar data was spoofed, and the flight paths are contradictory. This is because the planes are fake, as proven here:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 10:04 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988 |
Video compositing is proven, the capabilities of a real 767 are interesting, but not essential. Here's the essential:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 10:21 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988 |
Very interesting find, Seatinneb. I'm thinking they have the ability to inject fictitious radar data into the FAA system, not just NORAD. We can analyze the situation confident that no airplane hit the south tower. Here is the definitive proof of that:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 10:24 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988 |
This discussion of how the very difficult dive and bank angles COULD have possibly been accomplished is interesting, but irrelevant. We know with certainty that no aircraft hit the south tower. Here is the proof, and please feel free to attempt refutation.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 10:26 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988 |
Pictures of a landing gear in a museum? Nice! I wonder where the landing gear came from, it surely wasn't a real plane crash. Please see proof of video compositing:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 10:36 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Banned Posts: 101 Joined: 12-November 08 Member No.: 3,988 |
September Clues is disinfo, and is 95% false.
Nothing hit the south tower, video compositing is proven. Ignore September Clues, the correct proof is here: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....t=0&start=0 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2008, 03:06 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
Ace,
You attempt the above again in our house, i will personally show you the door. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 01:59 AM |
