IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Video Of Commercia Aircraft Spraying Something, Covert Geoengineering

Hsaive
post Apr 12 2014, 07:11 AM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 49
Joined: 25-January 09
From: Gainesville, Fl
Member No.: 4,087



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
almerie
post Apr 12 2014, 09:41 AM
Post #2





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-March 10
Member No.: 4,959



QUOTE (Hsaive @ Apr 12 2014, 07:11 AM) *
CODE


This video showing aircrafts with contrails, claims that civilian airlines are secretly being contracted for spraying chemicals.

Do you have a single evidence of such a contract?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Apr 13 2014, 12:13 AM
Post #3





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (Hsaive @ Apr 12 2014, 11:11 PM) *
Video Documentation Reveals Commercial Aircraft Spraying Chemtrails To Warm Climate


For the benefit of any CONtard who wants us to believe its congenital cognitive skills
are so impaired that we're supposed to believe it cannot recognize relevant information
contained within an exhibit, let's summarize the EVIDENCE present visually in this video.

(1) no distance between source and spray, being EVIDENCE of zero time for
the requisite ice nucleation formation prior IF not when condensation becomes visible.
Zero time in the presence of this visual effect means what we are witnessing cannot be condensation.

(2) bifurcated chemtrails, a divided pair of sprays from each engine, being EVIDENCE of 2 distinct
spray patterns clearly emerging from EACH spray device, being one from each side
of each engine-mount pylon,
meaning what we are witnessing is NOT from a single-exhaust hu-bypass turbofan.
EVIDENCE presented elsewhere proves the source is nozzles, plural, mounted in or on the pylon.

(3) at 0:48: third intermittent trail is auto-revealed intrinstic EVIDENCE
of artificial chemtrail production. This actual EVIDENCE of an inflight chemtrail,
emanating as it does from a part of the airplane totally unrelated to either jet engine,
completely and tautologically-definitively eliminates any thoughts of jet-exhaust condensation
from our enquiries. Hopefully it doesn't tempt a typical CONtard's innate idiocy to
suggest something too-obviously clueless, like a tail-mount APU shifted admidships for the photo shoot?

(4) specfically to include the previous post in response:
I will not fall for any attempt at entrapment by revealing top-classified military secrets:
whistleblowers have been murdered for revealing their knowledge of secret contracts.
For this reason, if you don't mind, old bean, I'll maintain strictly confidential relevant
EVIDENCE of the military's sordid secrecy, just for now.

Anecdotal evidence points to the CEO being the ONLY individual in a typical airline
who is in the know about the real reason certain large rewards or discounts
or other forms of fiscal inducement are being made undercover to the Company.
Not one of the captains on board any of the airplanes seen in this video or similar photography
need have the slightest knowledge of chemtrail emissions being made by his ship.

Four pointers clearly indicating something much more malicious than conventional contrails here; so,
having demonstrated all 8 Traits of a Disinformationalist over far-too-many prior posts,
which of the 25 Rules of Disinformation will you allow your perpeTRAITOR-Minder
demand you deploy in a vain attempt to address any of this actual EVIDENCE?

MikeR
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
almerie
post Apr 13 2014, 11:03 PM
Post #4





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-March 10
Member No.: 4,959



QUOTE (MikeR @ Apr 13 2014, 12:13 AM) *
Anecdotal evidence points to the CEO being the ONLY individual in a typical airline
who is in the know about the real reason certain large rewards or discounts
or other forms of fiscal inducement are being made undercover to the Company.
Not one of the captains on board any of the airplanes seen in this video or similar photography
need have the slightest knowledge of chemtrail emissions being made by his ship.


What anecdotal evidence would that be?

And please explain how the supposed chemicals are placed without the aircrew knowing anything about this?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Apr 14 2014, 09:04 PM
Post #5





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (almerie @ Apr 14 2014, 03:03 PM) *
What anecdotal evidence would that be?

And please explain how the supposed chemicals are placed without the aircrew knowing anything about this?


"Need to know" basics, lad .... baggage handlers load containers
into manifest-desigated places, flunkeys with tie-down straps tie
containers to airframe as instructed....flunkeys have no say in
which container goes where, baggage handlers have no
insider knowledge of contents of any container,
flunkey links up the odd refrigeration line to designated special
container, a line which connects to whatever airfram piped
supply is relevant, flunkey's instructions are simply
make the connection secure. Would YOU have your manual
laborer needing to know anything about "refrigeration" ... or
where on the airplane the supply pipe connects to??

The captain and pilots just watch lights and gauges...
why would they need to know what's in which container?
They just enjoy the last of the blue sky as they fly over and out
on top of the chemical grey cloud covering what in better
days used to be a lovely landscape till psychopath control freaks
hijacked our very existence on what they're convinced
is entirely their own planet

You surely don't need me to elaborate on how the aluminum mix
is placed in a baggage container... and how that container
is fork-lifted onto a container trolley... and who might or might
not know weather (sic) the slurry is in fact going to be used in
paint manufacture at the destination port?
You can find SOME imagination?

What exactly DO you find so impossible to understand? And why?

This post has been edited by MikeR: Apr 14 2014, 09:30 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
almerie
post Apr 15 2014, 01:22 AM
Post #6





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-March 10
Member No.: 4,959



QUOTE (MikeR @ Apr 14 2014, 09:04 PM) *
What exactly DO you find so impossible to understand? And why?


Because it pure fantasy. Thats why?

This could be easily solved by taking up Rob's offer of collecting samples directly from the contrails of an aircraft at high altitude.

I wonder why you are turning your back on his offer?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Apr 15 2014, 02:57 AM
Post #7





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (almerie @ Apr 15 2014, 05:22 PM) *
Because it pure fantasy. Thats why?

This could be easily solved by taking up Rob's offer of collecting samples directly from the contrails of an aircraft at high altitude.

I wonder why you are turning your back on his offer?



In other words you have zero imagination.

Rob would have better data from other sources,
but I've had my say on that score so what my
back does is of no interest to either of us.
Rob will need an airplane, and a pilot,
and some device to collect samples.

If you can contribute, please don't be put off
by any.erroneous ideas of
what constitutes pure fantasy in
the real world.

You and Rob WILL collect valid samples
I am sure, and I shall be most interested
in the analysis of what you find.. It will be
specially useful to compare with the vast
body of information regarding the chemicals
being secretly added to (y)our atmosphere,
as I'm sure you will agree.

MikeR

This post has been edited by MikeR: Apr 15 2014, 03:04 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
almerie
post Apr 15 2014, 03:39 AM
Post #8





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-March 10
Member No.: 4,959



QUOTE (MikeR @ Apr 15 2014, 02:57 AM) *
In other words you have zero imagination.


I need evidence, not imagination.

QUOTE
Rob will need an airplane, and a pilot,
and some device to collect samples.


Rob is a pilot.
You are distancing yourself from this by making a list of what Rob needs.

Best approach would be sampling by a neutral organisation approved by all parties involved.

QUOTE
You and Rob WILL collect valid samples
I am sure, and I shall be most interested
in the analysis of what you find.


You are again distancing yourself from this.
This not Rob's or my project, but a project belonging to the chemtrail enthusiasts.

QUOTE
It will be
specially useful to compare with the vast
body of information regarding the chemicals
being secretly added to (y)our atmosphere,
as I'm sure you will agree.


If Hancke had really found something important in his samples, would he not have published it right away in the public interest?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Apr 15 2014, 07:57 PM
Post #9





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (almerie @ Apr 15 2014, 07:39 PM) *
I need evidence, not imagination.

you know where to find evidence by now, lad HINT what the frack is Google for?

Rob is a pilot.
You are distancing yourself from this by making a list of what Rob needs.

Best approach would be sampling by a neutral organisation approved by all parties involved.

If you can't think of a better way, I won't stand in yours

You are again distancing yourself from this.
This not Rob's or my project, but a project belonging to the chemtrail enthusiasts.

You and Rob suggested the project, chemtrail enthusiasts
have been conducting valid research for years... HINT google


If Hancke had really found something important in his samples,
would he not have published it right away in the public interest?

Why not check what the good man has published.... but better still,
why not get off your fat chair and google the vast amount of comparabel\
and relevant research from all sources?


What is your REAL problem?


almerie .... I don't know what your game is old son...
I don't CARE that you are determined to ACT dumb...
but do yourself a favor.... and get your friend Rob
and any other pilots who appear to insist on remaining
blind and LISTEN to
Kristen Meghan blow the fracking whistle
louder and clearer than you will ever hear it ever again

THEN ask in(s)ane questions again... IF YOU DARE

MikeR

This post has been edited by MikeR: Apr 15 2014, 08:25 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
almerie
post Apr 16 2014, 12:39 AM
Post #10





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-March 10
Member No.: 4,959



QUOTE (MikeR @ Apr 15 2014, 07:57 PM) *
almerie .... I don't know what your game is old son...
I don't CARE that you are determined to ACT dumb...
but do yourself a favor.... and get your friend Rob
and any other pilots who appear to insist on remaining
blind and LISTEN to
Kristen Meghan blow the fracking whistle
louder and clearer than you will ever hear it ever again

THEN ask in(s)ane questions again... IF YOU DARE

MikeR


Kristen Meghan has still to provide evidence, all I have seen from her so far is hearsay.

I have searched quite a lot for evidence of chemtrails on the Internet actually, but so far I have found nothing.

Funny thing is, that when you ask 'chemtrail enthusiasts' directly for evidence, then you are bombarded by Ad Hom attack, YouTube clips and so on (your post above is a good example).

If there really exist indisputable evidence, then I why is it so difficult to present here?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
almerie
post Apr 16 2014, 01:28 AM
Post #11





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-March 10
Member No.: 4,959



QUOTE (MikeR @ Apr 15 2014, 07:57 PM) *
almerie .... I don't know what your game is old son...
I don't CARE that you are determined to ACT dumb...
but do yourself a favor.... and get your friend Rob
and any other pilots who appear to insist on remaining
blind and LISTEN to
Kristen Meghan blow the fracking whistle
louder and clearer than you will ever hear it ever again

THEN ask in(s)ane questions again... IF YOU DARE

MikeR


I actually wasted 20 miniutes of my life to watch this video and there is nothing new.

It is all hearsay and self-promotion.

Quote from the video (Kristen Meghan):

"I do public speaking for a living..."

This post has been edited by almerie: Apr 16 2014, 01:28 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
almerie
post Apr 16 2014, 02:22 AM
Post #12





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-March 10
Member No.: 4,959



QUOTE (Hsaive @ Apr 12 2014, 07:11 AM) *
<iframe src="//player.vimeo.com/video/85677840?color=c9ff23" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>


I am confused by this video.

According to the video, aircraft are spraying chemicals, if there is 'no gap' between engine exhausts and the contrails.

I was under the impression that persistent contrails was an indication of chemtrails? But this is no longer the case?

Could some 'chemtrail enthusiasts' please clear this up for me?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
airshow
post May 22 2015, 02:45 PM
Post #13





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 16
Joined: 13-April 08
From: Vancouver Canada
Member No.: 3,146



Sheer fantasy. The wing does create barometric changes and therefore does cause water vapour to form. You can have numerous contrails from one aircraft. Contrails form also behind propellor driven aircraft, something the chemtrail crowd forgets. Propellors cause contrails, as does the airframe. Jet engines also create water vapour in front of the inlet, due to compression and speed. Where is the chemtrail crowd on that. That this is even a subject anymore is proof that the constant defunding of public education is having an effect.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th October 2019 - 11:01 PM