IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
What Brought Down The Light Poles?, merged

NP1Mike
post Jan 2 2014, 12:35 AM
Post #161





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 422
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



QUOTE (Ricochet @ Sep 25 2010, 09:58 PM) *
Staging the light poles to be down would have been an extra sideshow not required. Think, why bother as it would not be relevant which approach AA77 came in at. Does anyone think of AA11 or UA175? No They just assume you accept the fact it happened.



Very simple answer that no one has mentioned.

The entrance hole and the exit hole in the Pentagon create an angle.
The angle the plane is supposed to have been flying at.
Have you studied geometry?

From the two holes it is possible to work backward, figure out the angle the plane was flying at and the path it had to have flown at to reach the Pentagon.

Think what would have happened if they DIDN'T STAGE THE POLES!!!

Get it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
onesliceshort
post Jan 2 2014, 05:22 PM
Post #162





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jan 2 2014, 05:30 AM) *
Oneslice at first that pole did seem rather odd to me too.
If you really put in the time and study the photos really carefully you will notice they all fit perfectly.
There is an optical illusion happening. In the close-up with the white sports car, the pole seems to have a very pronounced curve. That's just because of the photo angle.

It's the same pole as photo showing the pole, cab and Pentagon.


Agreed, it's the same pole Mike.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VirPil
post Sep 3 2018, 06:30 AM
Post #163





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 26
Joined: 16-September 11
Member No.: 6,281



Hi,

regarding video of Defense Department contractor Integrated Consultants.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

In this video Arlington Interchange is on the same level as Pentagon building, thus alleged B757 flies in level flight without changing altitude.

As far as I understand in reality this interchange is upper, for about 5-7 meters above:

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.8693637,-77...33;1b1!2i20

Officially aircraft was at level flight at almost zero altitude (left engine is about 60 cm. and wing about 3 m. above the ground, ), so if B757 cut the poles (and not at root, but at least half of the poles height judging from photos - i.e. 10m. agl) it needed drop for at least 7 meters in less then second while keeping level flights.

I guess it's completely impossible from physic lows point of view.

Do I understand it correctly?

Thanks.

This post has been edited by VirPil: Sep 3 2018, 06:31 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Sep 4 2018, 09:17 AM
Post #164





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,018
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (VirPil @ Sep 3 2018, 06:30 AM) *
Hi,

regarding video of Defense Department contractor Integrated Consultants.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

In this video Arlington Interchange is on the same level as Pentagon building, thus alleged B757 flies in level flight without changing altitude.

As far as I understand in reality this interchange is upper, for about 5-7 meters above:

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.8693637,-77...33;1b1!2i20

Officially aircraft was at level flight at almost zero altitude (left engine is about 60 cm. and wing about 3 m. above the ground, ), so if B757 cut the poles (and not at root, but at least half of the poles height judging from photos - i.e. 10m. agl) it needed drop for at least 7 meters in less then second while keeping level flights.

I guess it's completely impossible from physic lows point of view.

Do I understand it correctly?

Thanks.


It's great to see a little activity here VirPil! Yes, most of the details of what happened require that the laws of physics as we know them be suspended. Welcome aboard.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VirPil
post Sep 4 2018, 09:45 AM
Post #165





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 26
Joined: 16-September 11
Member No.: 6,281



Hi,

actually what is interesting me what is elevation of this interchange above Pentagon lawn. Is my assumption about 5-7 meters correct? I can't check it on the place wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VirPil
post Sep 8 2018, 12:30 PM
Post #166





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 26
Joined: 16-September 11
Member No.: 6,281



I found exact elevation data at https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/advanced-viewer/

Interchange elevation is seven meters above point where B757 allegedly was at level flight above ground.

Select 3DEP Elevation - Hillshade in Layer List, then Spot Elevation function.

(I can't upload screenshot there)

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 7 8 9
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th October 2018 - 08:23 PM