9/11: A Conspiracy Theory, corbettreport video! Options

[lunk]

in a nutshell:

[albertchampion]

LUNK, with this and jerry hauer's analysis of the reasons for the towers' collapsing, delivered minutes after the collapsing, i suppose that rob can now just go and close down this forum. nothing left to examine.

after all, sander0 hasn't told us anything more than hauer told us within minutes after the event[s].

[lunk]

Another gravity driven catastrophe?

[SanderO]

"Unread postby Major_Tom » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:34 pm


Just as offical technical explanation of the collapses dumb-ify the general public through models, so AE911T and STJ911 dumb-ify through exaggerated claims.

They both encourage their readership to embrace false claims, but they do it in different ways. For obvious reasons, a person who perceives that some reasoned "debate" exists between the NIST on one side and STJ911 and AE911T on the other are the perfect victims, since this person is destined to be incorrect no matter which "side" is supported. The viewer will see the 20+ million dollar NIST reports pitted against STJ911 and AE911T and "choose" between them, "choosing" fundamentally incorrect claims whichever way they go.


People who see official vs STJ911T-AE911T as the only choices must ultimately live in a maze of illusion. Their choice between franken-models or exaggerated claims will end in the general intellectual slop we see all around us.


In fact, most of what we have seen as "debate" is nothing more than those who believe in franken-models vs those who believe in exaggerated claims. The common theme is belief in incorrect second-hand knowledge, of which "both" opposing "sides" are equally guilty.
...............................................

But beyond the artificial divisions projected by the confused mind lies other possibilities. One could verify claims made by all parties to the best of ones ability instead of latching onto some perceived authority figure like a baby goose imprints to (hopefully) its mother.


Beyond the knee-jerk reaction to embrace a belief and consider all who do not embrace the same as ignorant lies the possibility of examining evidence carefully and questioning deep-seated beliefs. The evidence available currently shows that the "choice" between the NIST and STJ911-AE911T is no choice at all, since each of those parties relies on core premises that are provably incorrect.

A choice between bad and worse, or between true and false?

within the context of this "debate", the binary, "pill-box" mind doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of arriving at a correct answer. They will remain out-witted and thoroughly manipulated, seeing an "either-or" choice where none exists."

[lunk]

i think the common ground between everyone is that the fabled government explanation is full of errors, omissions and outright lies. Leaving anyone with half a brain to try and find a more plausible explanation.

Which is that the destruction of buildings on 9/11 must have been thought out, and planned, long in advance, to say the least.

[SanderO]

CD is a gravity driven, but not gravity caused collapse.

9/11 were also gravity driven, but likely not gravity caused. The two obvious causes... the plane strikes and the fires they caused in the twin towers do not appear to be sufficient to cause the gravity driven collapse. The building stood quite well after the plane strikes. The fire / heat factor obviously took some time, but still likely didn't get hot enough to sufficiently weaken the remaining columns. It's hard to know how much heat was present and for how long and where. But heat DOES weaken steel.

So with some columns gone... and the steel weakened from the heat it wouldn't take all that much to fail the entire core... in a progressive failure... That could be explosives or incendiaries. And we need to determine if this was the case.... Hence the call for a new investigation.