IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Wtc7 BBC2 Tonight (July 6) - As Nist Report Due, Merged- BBC The Conspiracy Files & '9/11 - The Third Tower'

Omega892R09
post Jul 4 2008, 11:35 AM
Post #1





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 2,194
Joined: 29-September 07
From: Hampshire, UK.
Member No.: 2,274



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/cons...les/7433017.stm

BBC re Jane Standley report produces more fudge with ducking and diving.

BBC = bullshit.gif Broadcasting Corporation

Edit:

Don't miss these:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/cons...les/7483700.stm

and

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/cons...les/7485111.stm

QUOTE
'...rather ridiculous situation has grown out of what's really a very small, very honest mistake'


Jane, question those who fed you with the information that you reported on, if you were being honest then your handlers were not. Clearly this 'mistake' reveals that some had foreknowledge - get your head out of the sand Ms Standley!

This post has been edited by Omega892R09: Jul 4 2008, 12:34 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Truthseekers
post Jul 6 2008, 12:41 PM
Post #2





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 405
Joined: 15-October 06
From: Outside the sheep pen.
Member No.: 66



[Merged with above post by d]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/cons...les/default.stm

Can be watched later via BBCi. No doubt this will be the BBC spin machine at work again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Jul 6 2008, 01:38 PM
Post #3


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



Here's my score on their silly 'Conspiracy Test':

QUOTE
26-50

Your responses indicate that you have a medium level of belief in conspiracy theories. You may well be quite trusting of your close friends, partners, those you work with and others but sometimes cannot be sure of all of them all of the time. You may also feel that your voice in terms of wider political decisions is rarely heard or acted upon, perhaps because government and big business is more concerned with their own interests than with those of the average person.


The test is really designed, I think, to indicate how paranoid you are. It focuses on how much you trust your close friends quite a lot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Truthseekers
post Jul 6 2008, 07:02 PM
Post #4





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 405
Joined: 15-October 06
From: Outside the sheep pen.
Member No.: 66



Aye, I took that test, was so good at it, I was called a freak! biggrin.gif. Anyhow, away from BBC unreality. Interesting that the BBC managed to create some excuse for the advanced knowledge etc... when the woman reporter stated she never had any information. Shoots BBC to bits then eh?. And that weird looking homo pigmy from NIST!!?, boy oh boy, using the same 'pancake' theory for the reason WTC7 came down. Must be more Meth/Crack addicts than I first thought!.

Avery portrayed himself as a complete prick. Swearing?, nice way to get a point across you muppet. Did nothing to help the cause. Did the BBC inject words and mouth movements to discredit him?.

Oh, nearly forgot. They say the right(?) side was damaged severely by falling wreckage from one of the main towers...?. Why was the damaged side last to fall during the CD sequence?.

This post has been edited by Truthseekers: Jul 6 2008, 07:11 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Jul 6 2008, 08:00 PM
Post #5



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



Here's a photo of the most damaged corner of WTC7 that I have found. Sure- about 9 corner "window" offices got pretty fukkered-up, but I would hardly call this "catastrophic" structural damage. There is pretty good evidence that the WTC7 fires began before the WTC1N collapse too- see the WTC7 section here at P4911T.

Another thing- I get a perpendicular "closest approach" of 321 feet from WTC1N's north face to WTC7's south face in Google Earth (there is a NOAA Sept. 23, 2001 image with the WTC locations drawn in in yellow). What caused the WTC1N debris to get enough horizontal momentum to hit WTC7 with enough impact to cause the damage shown in the link below? Gravity generally pulls downward doesn't it?

I really need to start a blown out windows thread too.

[Big file- slow load times]
http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc-110.jpg

EDIT: This isn't the NOAA overlay (that won't load in Google Earth now), but it does have a Site Map that you can turn on):
http://www.gelib.com/maps/Hist_Aerials/WTC_nl.kml

EDIT2: Apparently the NOAA overlay has been deleted since last night. I saved a copy though:
http://www.orbitfiles.com/download/id3062162746.html

Here is the WTC1 to WTC7 distance:
http://www.orbitfiles.com/download/id3062167571.html

And the WTC2 to WTC7 distance:
http://www.orbitfiles.com/download/id3062171339.html

And a map of the WTC complex with GPS coordinates:
http://www.orbitfiles.com/download/id2906473722.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Woolfie
post Jul 6 2008, 09:59 PM
Post #6





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 82
Joined: 16-October 07
From: UK
Member No.: 2,379



Having watched this program tonight it now makes sense....They are covering up a cover up!!! thumbdown.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Jul 6 2008, 10:16 PM
Post #7





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,016
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



Gravity pulls only 1 way--toward the center of the planet.

Gravitational events cannot hurl stuff horizontally.

The pimps for the OCT would have one believe that some sort of giant tiddly-winks is going on, chipping pieces of the exoskeleton and building outwards.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ron1872
post Jul 7 2008, 01:16 AM
Post #8





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 5
Joined: 24-April 08
Member No.: 3,214



QUOTE (Woolfie @ Jul 6 2008, 09:59 PM) *
Having watched this program tonight it now makes sense....They are covering up a cover up!!! thumbdown.gif


The point is that they did not mention Barry Jennings statement that he heard load explosions beneath the 6th floor while the Twin Towers were still standing. They cut this at after about 10 minutes in the programme. I hope it will be online soon for people in the US, so you can see what they did!

This post has been edited by ron1872: Jul 7 2008, 01:17 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omega892R09
post Jul 7 2008, 08:14 AM
Post #9





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 2,194
Joined: 29-September 07
From: Hampshire, UK.
Member No.: 2,274



QUOTE (Oceans Flow @ Jul 4 2008, 03:38 PM) *
Here's my score on their silly 'Conspiracy Test':



The test is really designed, I think, to indicate how paranoid you are. It focuses on how much you trust your close friends quite a lot.

LOL I got exactly the same score.

I started creating a copy of my input and response but then my 'net connection bombed again (b.... Virgin media cable, I know it is their problem, the whole south of England was out the other day and it has been playing up for weeks now) and had to give up for the night. I also had to abandon a response in that Aluminium/Magnesium alloys thread but see that dMole has covered that well (as usual).

As our satellite TV is also playing up (got to be a conspiracy - NO?) I did not get to watch this latest BBC foray into excuse-land. Since that David Kelley nonsense the BBC are even less likely to report anything that cuts against those with their noses in the trough.

Edit: Watching now on BBC iPlayer.

The commentator keeps mentioning 'official investigators' without being more specific - this is bad commentary.

This post has been edited by Omega892R09: Jul 7 2008, 10:08 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Jul 8 2008, 06:12 PM
Post #10



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



Related threads are at:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=13772

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index....showtopic=13767
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JFK
post Jul 10 2008, 09:30 AM
Post #11





Group: Guest
Posts: 564
Joined: 2-June 08
Member No.: 3,485



Barry Jennings full uncut interview released by "Louder than Words", the creators of Loose Change.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/16573

The 6th floor landing blew up before either tower fell.

BBC timeline is manipulated. No if's ands's or but's about it.


Use this to download if you so desire ( 74.6 Mb ) - http://www.orbitdownloader.com/index.htm

wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Jul 11 2008, 03:41 PM
Post #12



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



Do our friends in the UK think that last BBC program is a consequence of the following, or are the two un-related? I have no idea of how the UK courts work, other than you call your attorneys/lawyers "barristers." Also, do they still wear the wigs, or is that a Hollywood embellishment?

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=7843
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Woolfie
post Jul 11 2008, 04:36 PM
Post #13





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 82
Joined: 16-October 07
From: UK
Member No.: 2,379



>DMole...Yes the barristers still wear their wigs! wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
barney_rebel
post Jul 11 2008, 09:44 PM
Post #14





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 591
Joined: 7-November 06
Member No.: 211



QUOTE (Truthseekers @ Jul 4 2008, 09:02 PM) *
Aye, I took that test, was so good at it, I was called a freak! biggrin.gif. Anyhow, away from BBC unreality. Interesting that the BBC managed to create some excuse for the advanced knowledge etc... when the woman reporter stated she never had any information. Shoots BBC to bits then eh?. And that weird looking homo pigmy from NIST!!?, boy oh boy, using the same 'pancake' theory for the reason WTC7 came down. Must be more Meth/Crack addicts than I first thought!.

Avery portrayed himself as a complete prick. Swearing?, nice way to get a point across you muppet. Did nothing to help the cause. Did the BBC inject words and mouth movements to discredit him?.

Oh, nearly forgot. They say the right(?) side was damaged severely by falling wreckage from one of the main towers...?. Why was the damaged side last to fall during the CD sequence?.


"Hey we [BBC] didn't lose the tapes, we found them! They were misplaced". Did you guys watch this?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Jul 11 2008, 10:01 PM
Post #15



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,983
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



Anybody who can't spell the word "writen" right is written off,
by the powers that obey.
...but not by me, as the idea is more important than the spellling.


Slick hit piece.
(read slower, I didn't swear)

still imo, lunk
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sanders
post Jul 12 2008, 12:03 AM
Post #16



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 7,990
Joined: 13-September 06
Member No.: 49



QUOTE (barney_rebel @ Jul 15 2008, 08:44 PM) *
"Hey we [BBC] didn't lose the tapes, we found them! They were misplaced". Did you guys watch this?


Yeah, and my dog ate my homework. How lame ! laughing1.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
barney_rebel
post Jul 12 2008, 11:59 AM
Post #17





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 591
Joined: 7-November 06
Member No.: 211



I also personally didn't like Dylan swearing like that too. Probably a buildup of frustration over the years trying to get the same points across to everyone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JFK
post Jul 12 2008, 12:49 PM
Post #18





Group: Guest
Posts: 564
Joined: 2-June 08
Member No.: 3,485



QUOTE (barney_rebel @ Jul 12 2008, 11:59 AM) *
I also personally didn't like Dylan swearing like that too. Probably a buildup of frustration over the years trying to get the same points across to everyone.


http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums...60&t=364464

QUOTE (Dylan Avery)
QUOTE (AnimalResource)
Oh and LOL at Dylan and the F word. Why did he get so angry at the end?

Richard Clarke makes me upset. biggrin.gif

What can I say? I let my emotions get the best of me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ricochet
post Jul 12 2008, 03:27 PM
Post #19





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 746
Joined: 25-April 08
From: Canada
Member No.: 3,225



I found this in the recently leaked NIST documents.
QUOTE
Figure 1-3. Progression of simulated fire, Floor 7, WTC 7. Shown are upper layer temperatures, with the color red representing severe fire activity (temperatures of about 1000 C).
1.3.2 Floor 8
At 12:15 when the cubicle fire was observed on Floor 7, several people were being led from Floors 7 and 8 out of the building. No fires, heavy dust, or smoke were reported at this time on Floor 8. Between 12:15 and 2:30, fire activity on Floor 8 was observed at the south face by eyewitnesses near the southwest corner of the building. At 3:00, fire was observed on Floors 7 and 12 at the north face, but not Floor 8. Some time later that hour, fire was observed on the north face of Floor 8, moving from west to east. Unlike the fire on Floor 7, the fire on Floor 8 continued to move east on the north face, eventually

http://www.infowars.net/WTC7Report/McGratt...r%20WTC%207.doc

Who the hell were the people on floors 7& 8 that were being led out and who was leading them out? In earlier NIST reports state that firefighting efforts had been halted by 11:30 due to a lack of water.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th March 2019 - 10:50 PM