Decoys And Drones, war games, or mind games
Mar 28 2007, 03:34 PM
Group: Valued Member
Joined: 28-August 06
From: Virginia, USA
Member No.: 19
One of the first posts I read following the days right after 9/11 described the entire event as one large operation. A lot of details were involved but the basic line was that none of the actual flights reached the known impact points, they were shadowed and replaced in flight.
This story follows that same thought, but will a slight twist. All of these things are very possible and no theory no matter how 'crazy' should be discounted.
Synopsis: Describes 9/11 murders of captains Charles Burlingame and Gerald DeConto using decoy and drone maneuvers and jets with embedded GyroChips (military gyroscope).
McConnell, Hawkins Describe 9/11 Murder of Burlingame, DeConto http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelin...ay_of_9/11=aa77
Copyright: Captain Field McConell and David Hawkins
We describe below the alleged sequence of events which resulted in the murders of Captain Charles Burlingame and Captain Gerald DeConto on September 11, 2001.
Sometime before take off at 8:20 a.m. (10 minutes late) Captain Burlingame boarded a decoy Boeing 757, presented to him and the public as American Airlines Flight 77 flying out of Washington's Dulles International Airport.
The decoy had been painted in American Airlines colors and illegally modified by a `red team' without the captain's knowledge to participate in a simulated "al-Qaeda" hijack attack on `blue team' defenders of the Pentagon in a bogus war game "Global Guardian"
Red team and blue team had different perceptions of their roles in the upcoming war game, thanks to fraudulent side bets on the results of Global Guardian by red team commanders and hedge fund managers of the Carlyle Canada* private equity group.
Prior to 9/11, the red team had given AA Flight 77 a false tail number and modified the decoy's avionics so the plane could be flown remotely by red-team Laborers (`LIUNA') embedded with FAA air traffic controllers.
The red team would control decoy AA77 with Boeing's Iridium satellite communications system, an embedded GyroChip-equipped flight box containing a QRS-11 missile gyroscope, and Instrument Approach Procedures (`IAP') software developed for the U.S. Air Force and the FAA by the Carlyle affiliate, Macdonald Dettwiler and Associates.
Captain Burlingame could not comply with "The Captain WILL make the FINAL decision as to whether the aircraft may be safely operated"; he did not know that a QRS-11 was embedded in his jet.
When Captain Burlingame took off from Dulles the flight was joined in the air by at least two other red-team planes, making up a convoy of three.
The red team tucked a drone plane – probably a 737 – behind and in the radar shadow of Burlingame's 757.
The drone was painted in AA colors and modified to fly remotely in the same way as the decoy but the drone was loaded with special weapons needed to knock out the US Naval Command Center in the Pentagon where Captain DeConto was serving as duty officer.
The red team would use a Bombardier CE 144 from the NATO flight training school in Moose Jaw Saskatchewan as a combat support jet to fly behind the decoy and the drone led by the initially unsuspecting Captain Burlingame.
At 8:54 a.m., the red team commander in the Bombardier CE-144 combat support jet initiated an electronic `hijacking' of the decoy Flight 77 Flight 77 which began to go off course over southern Ohio, with a turning to the southwest.
Two minutes later the red team turned off the decoy Flight 77 transponder and jammed blue team links to the cockpit, leaving Captain Burlingame unable to communicate with the legitimate air traffic controllers of the FAA or prospective U.S. Air force interceptors.
The Bombardier based red team commanders then flew the AA77 decoy-and-drone combination towards Washington by remote control, relying on LIUNA saboteurs working in the Pentagon Wedge 1 with Amec and Iridium virtual war rooms with the FAA to confuse the blue-team responders.
Beginning at 8:56 a.m., the red team sabotaged FAA primary radar data system software so that for at least eight minutes and 13 seconds, Indianapolis flight controllers could not see the maneuvers being set up by the convoy as it prepared for the attack.
At around 9:00 a.m., the red team used the Bombardier CE-144 to inject false radar signals from the convoy to confuse the NORAD tracking system in Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado.
At that time, the NORAD response to the electronic hijacking was commanded by two Canadian officers, Captain Mike Jellinek and Major General Eric Findley, who we see as either incompetent members of the blue team or treasonous members of the red team.
At 9:29 a.m., the red team disengaged the decoy Flight 77's autopilot, presumably to fly the plane with MDA IAP software with the plane flying at 7,000 feet about 38 miles west of the Pentagon.
At 9:34 a.m., the red team flies decoy AA77 over the Pentagon and out over the Atlantic where, mission completed, it is ditched with any surface debris and evidence to be removed by Carlyle affiliated vessels, owned or controlled by Canada Steamship Lines.
At the same moment, the red team peels off the AA77 drone from the en-route airway of the decoy, locks the embedded GyroChip onto a "Final Approach Corridor" to target the U.S. Naval Command Center as arranged with Amec Laborers' construction team.
The drone AA77 begins a tight pivoted descent at 540 mph levels off over the Pentagon lawn and enters Wedge 1 at the first floor to kill Captain DeConto and disable communication links between the now-sabotaged command center and the U.S. Navy.
The red team immediately switches Pentagon VoIP (Internet voice) functions provided by Carlyle affiliate Nortel, bypasses the U.S. presidential chain of command and transfers the control of the red team Laborers to the Carlyle affiliate MDA.
Carlyle's red team agents, needed for the clean up, media spin and the planting and spoliation of evidence of the murder of captains Burlingame and DeConto, and numerous acts of arson and fraud, are coordinated through an MDA operational system ..
.. "that allows military personnel to securely create, send and receive messages around the world. Our naval combat trainers employ computer-based simulation software for military training, providing a safe and effective alternative to traditional field exercises. Public safety relies on effective collection, management and distribution of information. Our experience in real-time databases, secure wireless networks, and dedicated Internet infrastructures forms the basis for police information solutions on local, regional and national levels. Today, local and regional police are using our police records system to file and retrieve critical information from fixed and mobile workstations."
Collectively, we have 80 years experience across industries facing extortion by the Carlyle Canada private equity group and its mobbed-up agents in the Laborers' union.
We will now proceed against them and get Justice for Captain Charles Burlingame and Captain Gerald DeConto and the thousands of their fellow innocents murdered on 9/11.
28 year airline employee
22 year military pilot
23,000+ hours of safety
Notes: "McConnell, Hawkins Describe 9/11 Murder of Burlingame, DeConto"
"Richmond, B.C. - MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. (TSE: MDA) announced today the company has been awarded a contract by the United States Air Force to develop a system to be used by specialists at Air Force bases to design Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs). IAPs are published instructions to pilots specifying a series of aircraft maneuvers that must be executed for the aircraft to transition safely from an en route airway to a runway final approach when flying by instruments. MDA's system ingests digital terrain and elevation data, air navigation data (such as the locations of navigation aids, runways, buildings and towers) to build and display a virtual model of the physical environment surrounding an airport. It then develops the complex surfaces that define a safe approach corridor for any of the dozens of IAP variants, and determines whether any of the defined surfaces are penetrated by terrain or man-made obstacles. It flags these incursions to the operator, who can quickly modify the approach procedure through a drag-and-drop user interface. This initial award, valued at $2.9 million (CDN), consists of a fixed price element to develop, integrate, and test the system. The next phase will include installation, government testing, and operator training. The contract includes an option for the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to adapt the system for their needs. The U.S. Air Force also has options to field the successful system at up to 108 air bases around the world, and to award T&M support contracts for up to 8 years. MDA plans to team up with Air Navigation Data (AND) of Ottawa to offer a custom solution, based on AND's "Final Approach" product."
Apr 1 2007, 03:07 PM
Group: Valued Member
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331
Sounds plausible. Cool twist. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)
|Lo-Fi Version||Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 02:48 AM|