IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Full Film - 9/11: World Trade Center Attack, Embedded and Streaming here!

Rating 5 V
 
rob balsamo
post Mar 23 2010, 11:17 AM
Post #21



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,266
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (SanderO @ Mar 23 2010, 07:58 AM) *
Who supplied the air speeds/ground speeds of those planes?

Were the air speeds/ground speeds of those planes taken from RADES or ATC supplied information?


http://pilotsfor911truth.org/p4t/Radar_Dat...AA11,_UA175.pdf


QUOTE
Has anyone calculated the air speeds /ground speed from the videos of the planes hitting the towers?



http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10783680
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SanderO
post Mar 23 2010, 04:55 PM
Post #22





Group: Troll
Posts: 1,174
Joined: 23-December 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,814



The answer is that this was data from EWR and so it is likely been inserted.

It was not calculated. QED.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Apr 5 2010, 02:59 PM
Post #23



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,266
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (SanderO @ Mar 23 2010, 04:55 PM) *
The answer is that this was data from EWR and so it is likely been inserted.

It was not calculated. QED.


The data is from ASR and Rades Radar. We do not have any evidence that the data was "inserted", we can only analyze the data in which the NTSB claims is accurrate. If the data is accurate, the speeds are impossible for a stock 767 as demonstrated and calculated in the film.

Also, as pointed out thoroughly in the film, if you believe the data is fake, you may want to think twice about getting on your next flight as information gathered and reported by the National Transporatation Safety Board is used for determining changes in policy, regulation and/or technology in safety of flight.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SanderO
post Apr 5 2010, 03:35 PM
Post #24





Group: Troll
Posts: 1,174
Joined: 23-December 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,814



If the NTSB data is impossible as you say it is.... and I believe you there are only two possible conclusions:

The data (speeds) were fabricated (a lie)

The data was accurate, but there were different planes which could achieve those speeds not the ones we were told. (a lie)

What air frames of that size... assuming that the videos are accurate... could make those speeds?

Is it more likely that the data was cooked or that the plane was not a 767?

The entire plane "thing" is a mystery.

No decent evidence of the hijackers boarding those flights
No serial number parts recovered
hardly any plane parts recovered
A wheel assembly which apparently was faked in photos on Rector Street
No video of the plane at the Pentagon
almost impossible flight path for the Pentagon plane
Bizarre speed data
no luggage etc recovered, but DNA was
Cell calls which were impossible made from the planes
Reports of a plane landing in Cleveland
WTC 2 hit in a manner which defies human controlled flight control
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Apr 5 2010, 03:50 PM
Post #25



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,266
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (SanderO @ Apr 5 2010, 03:35 PM) *
What air frames of that size... assuming that the videos are accurate... could make those speeds?


I have no idea. Feel free to speculate if you wish. Pilots For 9/11 Truth does not speculate. We seek answers from those who supplied and are responsible for the data. The list grows.

QUOTE
Is it more likely that the data was cooked or that the plane was not a 767?


Again, you are asking us to speculate. If you know anything about P4T, you know, we don't speculate.

What we do know is that if the data is "cooked", it has MAJOR ramification for Flight Safety in general as we train by such data every six months to make flying more safe for the traveling public. Again, if one feels the data is "cooked", how much other data was "cooked" in which pilots, ATC, etc... have used to train?



QUOTE
No decent evidence of the hijackers boarding those flights
No serial number parts recovered
hardly any plane parts recovered
A wheel assembly which apparently was faked in photos on Rector Street
No video of the plane at the Pentagon
almost impossible flight path for the Pentagon plane
Bizarre speed data
no luggage etc recovered, but DNA was
Cell calls which were impossible made from the planes
Reports of a plane landing in Cleveland
WTC 2 hit in a manner which defies human controlled flight control


I agree SanderO, none of it adds up. That is why P4T and numerous other organizations filled with professionals questioning 9/11, exist. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tnemelckram
post Apr 10 2010, 02:50 AM
Post #26





Group: Contributor
Posts: 766
Joined: 30-January 08
Member No.: 2,690



Hi Rob and SanderO!

Just wanted to say that it is a pleasure to watch two sound minds at work in the last ten or so posts.

SanderO for recognizing that "none of it adds up" and asking some damn good questions, but not expecting answers that will deliver the kind of satisfying certainty that small minds crave.

Rob for patiently and frankly giving answers that confirm that "none of it adds up" on the facts while acknowledging the limitations of those facts if you go into trying to find some certainty beyond that.

The bottom line is that the doubts justify a new and proper investigation. But if we don't get that, maybe it will be enough for the doubts to permanently discredit the OCT enough so that it doesn't become the version that historians accept in the long run.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Apr 19 2010, 08:34 PM
Post #27



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,266
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (tnemelckram @ Apr 10 2010, 02:50 AM) *
Just wanted to say that it is a pleasure to watch two sound minds at work in the last ten or so posts.

SanderO for recognizing that "none of it adds up" and asking some damn good questions, but not expecting answers that will deliver the kind of satisfying certainty that small minds crave.

Rob for patiently and frankly giving answers that confirm that "none of it adds up" on the facts while acknowledging the limitations of those facts if you go into trying to find some certainty beyond that.



Rational minds at work...

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Johnny Angel
post Apr 23 2010, 02:11 AM
Post #28





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 186
Joined: 15-April 07
From: Pittsburgh Pa USA
Member No.: 956



What you may fail to relize is that these Hijackers chanted "Ali Mack Ulbar" (or something like that)
That means that God is great, (or something like that) therefore all laws of physics were nuetralized and the planes were able to be guided into the bldgs as easily as playing a video game in a vacuum.

Chanting the ""ali mack albar"" also helped the hijackers overcome the effects of alcohol from the night before while attending the strip club in Portland Oregon.

PS: Great Video..Thank you for your dedication. I guarentee you I will be using this information...

I see the point. There is no way to controll the Jets at high speed.

I have a Macgregor 26X MotorSailer. The Sailboat has a flater type hull and with a 50 hp outboard motor it can reach speeds of 18-20 mph with the motor. The Manual for the boat warns that you must pull up the centerboard and rudders if you are motoring over 6 mph, or you risk capsize. I was motoring along at about 15 mph when the rope to the centerboard broke, suddenly the boat started swaying back and forth uncontrollably. I cut the motor to regain controll, as I started to speed up over 6 mph i could not steer the boat in a straight line. I motored back to the dock at less than 6 mph thinking I had some serious hull problem.. When I was returning to the dock I realized the board was down because the controll rope was broken. (The"" Ali Mack Ulbar" chant didnt work for me..)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Skeptik
post Apr 23 2010, 05:34 AM
Post #29





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 63
Joined: 1-September 07
Member No.: 1,946



The phrase is "Allahu Akbar" which translates as "God is great"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
datars
post Apr 23 2010, 12:05 PM
Post #30


New Terrorist in Town


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 978
Joined: 14-August 06
From: S.F. Bay Area
Member No.: 6



QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Apr 16 2010, 05:34 PM) *
Yes! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 08:40 PM