Plate Tectonics And Continental Drift., And I thought I knew all about it... Options

[elreb]

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...&p=10798588

Ok…we are only talking about Earth…

I mix flour, sugar, eggs, oil and water in a bowl until it weighs “One” pound. I bake it for about an hour at 350 degrees.

This cake when cooked still weighs “One” pound but it has doubled in size and has a crust that looks like the surface of the earth.

When a Star collapses in upon itself, it becomes a cake in reverse…that over time will double in size by cooling off. This will also have the effect of moving surface matter away from the core…theoretically reducing gravitational affect.

Only a fluid “Iron” core can create the electromagnetic field. Perhaps this is the bugger that changes gravity.

[lunk]

i see, but the gravity appears to be less in the past.
Fossils of land dinosaurs over 33 feet tall, means that gravity was less back then, or they would have a vacuum in their brain, because water doesn't siphon over 33 feet in today's gravity.
And going further back in time there were dragonflys with 3 foot wing span!
These could not exist today, simply because there is more gravity on the surface of the Earth. The only thing, we know that gravity can come from, is matter. This indicates, from fossil records, that Earth has grown more matter, causing gravity to increase for the whole planet.
This is not indications of expansion, where gravity would decrease.

Now did the Earth start out as a core of a star?
i don't know. It probably was part of one, or many, at least.

There is a theory that under enough heat and pressure, hydrogen can become magnetic. And from hydrogen all other elements are made,
considering that a neutron is a phase of a hydrogen atom.

[GroundPounder]

Only a fluid “Iron” core can create the electromagnetic field.

i sort of take issue with that. any electric field has a magnetic field associated with it and does not depend on the presence of iron. well, that's the theory anyway.

[elreb]

i sort of take issue with that. any electric field has a magnetic field associated with it and does not depend on the presence of iron. well, that's the theory anyway.

Our focus is on planets only…

Earth has a hot, molten, Iron Core [under radioactive decay] and it has a strong electro-magnetic field.

Venus on the other hand, has a solid Iron Core, a very, very weak electro-magnetic field and only residual magnetism. When the Core of Venus was molten, the planet had extensive volcanism, and expansion.

NASA was surprised at the lack of an intrinsic magnetic field on Venus because they are “Big Bangers” and do not understand that Venus is “three” times older than Earth. When you study the conclusions of all “Astrophysics”…it is all conjecture or opinion.

Planets and Moons are dead Stars cooling off…it is that simple…

@ Lunk
Of all people you should understand thinking out of the box. There was no big bang, Neal Adams growing Earth is correct, water on Earth came from Earth, the true nature of Black Wholes…and so on.

[GroundPounder]

Earth has a hot, molten, Iron Core [under radioactive decay] and it has a strong electro-magnetic field.

that's a theory. last time i checked, drilling into the earth hadn't gotten much past the Moho (mohorvichic (sp?) discountinuity), which is the boundary between the crust and the mantle. so what kind of hard data confirms the theory?

sorry, i don't much trust theories or nasa or most of the goobledy gook i've been fed as the gospel.

[elreb]

sorry, i don't much trust theories or nasa or most of the goobledy gook i've been fed as the gospel.

I totally agree with not trusting expert theories…

My observations come from living over a “hotspot” and one of the most active Volcanoes on Earth. Every Island here, at one time was a Volcano. Most of my information comes from “Pele” & “Maui”.

Our Volcanoes go down over 1,864 miles

Funny, but Hawaii is the tallest mountain earth.
(IMG:http://media.marine-geo.org/files/images/2008-MGDS-273.preview.jpg)

[lunk]

There is something about the latitude of the big island and a corner
of the base of a tetrahedron, inside a sphere.

i wonder if the solar system is a scale model of a sulfur atom.
...the sun is sort of yellow.

[elreb]

i wonder if the solar system is a scale model of a sulfur atom.
...the sun is sort of yellow.

I believe that "big" and "small" relate.[something you believe in]

(IMG:http://www.chelationtherapyonline.com/technical/images/Animated_Normal_Atom.gif)

[lunk]

Yes, but to get from small to big, things have to be built.
Having lots of bricks does not a house make.
The bricks have to be ordered and placed into walls, and a roof needs to be placed over top.

But a house does not make a town, and it takes many towns to make a province or state...
Though the dot on the map, is a town, that's made from bricks.

Yet the world in space is but a dot, and covered with countries with towns,
The town of bricks, has not expanded into the world.

Yet, we see the same dot repeating itself in scale.

A proton with electrons spinning around it,
A star with planets spinning around it.

Simplicity is a dot in complexity,
and complexity is simply,
a dot in the infinite scale of things.

[elreb]

My old words, “Complex…yet simple”

For the time being, I will stick with the Milky Way and our many Solar Systems.

If my model is correct, then a Star would be equal to a Proton and that dead Stars/Planets are Electrons.

This could offer the possibility of a Black Whole being a Neutron.

This concept allows Protons to be built from much smaller particles and the parents of Electrons & Neutrons. This would indicate that the chicken came before the egg.

[lunk]

My old words, “Complex…yet simple”

For the time being, I will stick with the Milky Way and our many Solar Systems.

If my model is correct, then a Star would be equal to a Proton and that dead Stars/Planets are Electrons.

This could offer the possibility of a Black Whole being a Neutron.

This concept allows Protons to be built from much smaller particles and the parents of Electrons & Neutrons. This would indicate that the chicken came before the egg.

Energy always originates, from matter.
So matter must be here first, for energy to come from it.
i don't see how there could be a beginning to this matter universe.

The building block of matter, must have mass, and volume, but its volume and mass, could be too small to detect.
It takes 921 of these to make 1 hydrogen atom, or neutron.
These prime matter particles consist of a positron and electron, and only have mass and can travel right through matter as if it wasn't there.
However there are attracted to gravity and fall to every center of gravity, if conditions are right, (like inside a planet) it will latch on to a free positron, along with 919 other prime matter particles, a free electron can't get to the positron because it is shielded by layers of pmps, so it forms a shell around, or inside, the proton, making a hydrogen atom, or neutron.

Now an atom has volume and is matter, and matter has properties of its' own.
This is how matter grows in large gravitational centers.
New atoms are being made in greater and greater volumes inside the Earth, moon, planets.
As matter is being created from "nothing" this newly created moving- matter adds momentum to the orbiting body, increasing its' orbit.

It's through scale that we have all this.
Matter is like the growing bubbles in the soda pop of the universe.

Now i think that the system is looped, the smallest things are the biggest things, at what point this material world repeats, i don't know.
But great distances could be traveled by going in through the core of a planet or star, as this entire universe will exist at the center of everything in it.

So perhaps stars are atoms. perhaps the comets are the electrons?

There have been a lot of them lately, like weekly, these days.

[BarryWilliamsmb]

Thank you Elreb for Neal Adams.

You make being kicked out of school a good thing.

[Tamborine man]

Thank you Elreb for Neal Adams.

You make being kicked out of school a good thing.

I got kicked out of school when i was 13!

Or more precisely, 24 days before my 14th birthday.

Or the day before the start of the summer holidays.

I was so happy, and never looked back!

Cheers

[Tamborine man]

error again!

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: May 27 2011, 12:20 AM

[lunk]

Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing
has just hit 1 million views on yt.
and the rate of views and comments have increased dramatically, since that additional digit.

There is a very comparable effect, running parallel to individuals' independent investigations into 9/11.
We get the official story, that only can conform to some of the facts with very complex explanations, when all the same evidence is simply explained with pre-planted explosives and such, meaning that it was no surprise attack, at all. And was just an planned event used to proliferate wars, apparently, world wide, against the individual!

The re-interpretation of the existing evidence, (that caused for very complex technical sounding excuses in plate tectonic theory,) are simply explained from the perspective of the Growing Earth and Universe theory, by Neal Adams.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ

The comments are the most interesting part, as the implications of this new theory, mean that most of our foundational theories of physics and geology need to be corrected. And new discoveries are being made all the time!

[elreb]

Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing

The El Mayor–Cucapah Earthquake of April 2010 is proof of expansion.

Lunk’s finger trick shows how it works…

(IMG:http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/622265main_borrego_scarp-673.jpg)

[Tamborine man]

Dear Lunk,

i suspect Mr. Adams got his idea or theory from Mark McCutsheon's book "The final theory" .......?

If so, i humbly suggest/advice you keep far away from this 'theory', as this book is total 'bonkers'! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

These 'funny' theories would be in stark violation of the 'laws of balance' - of course -

Just my piddly 7 cents .......

Cheers

[elreb]

I’m sure we have talked about this before…

Kilauea volcano sits on a “Hot Spot” that never moves.

The Hawaiian Archipelago is over 1600 miles long, all originating from the same “Hot Spot”.

So I’m guessing we are supposed to believe that the Seafloor and Continents can drift but not “Hot Spots”?

Most of the volcanic activity produces “Mafic” magma which is rich in iron and magnesium. When exposed to air, this lava releases steam, oxygen and carbon dioxide and expands…literally creating the earth we stand on.

Another part of this oxidation process is the formation of the Ferromagnetic mineral called Magnetite.

Terrestrial planets have metallic cores, mostly Iron because they are dead Stars. The heat is the result of hydrogen fusion products such as thorium, uranium and plutonium. It is simple decay heat or thermal heat.

Think of Charcoal grilling with iron briquettes.

The Star to…White dwarf to…Planet hypothesis come exclusively from Elreb.

As planets cool…they expand.

When the core cools to a complete solid…the planet loses its magnetic field as in the case of Mars and Venus.

No big bang…

[amazed!]

I just read a book that among other things showed how Anartica used to be nearly tropical.

I wonder if something like that might be what's in store for around 12/21/12?

Fascinating stuff, Lunk.

[elreb]

I wonder if something like that might be what's in store...

Antarctica was indeed a tropical island before 13,000 – 12700 years ago.

Fortunately, only a “Supernovas” less than 20 light years from us can move the Earth.

Nothing of any concern is going to happen this year, with the exception of another “War” that the US Federal government invents from thin air.

I also understand that coins will be made from recycled soda pop bottles and that gasoline will be $5 per gallon if Lindsay Lohan host SNL!