IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Initiation Of Explosive Collapse

Beached
post Dec 9 2006, 03:29 PM
Post #1





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 802
Joined: 20-October 06
Member No.: 117



If you watch the following video closely, you will notice a plume just above the sky lobby and below the point of impact before the tower begins to fall. Pause the video at the :01 second mark...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNmJZUQD74s

Remember, if these plumes originate from explosives placed around the core, there would be a split second time delay between the moment of detonation and appearance of squibs.

Explosive demolition folks! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)

This post has been edited by Beached: Dec 9 2006, 03:33 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Beached
post Feb 10 2007, 01:32 PM
Post #2





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 802
Joined: 20-October 06
Member No.: 117



In the NBC video taken of the South Tower collapse, a small white squib emerges from the level of the impact zone (0:02 seconds) about three-quarters of the way back on the right face. This immediately precedes the first large ejections from the southeast face.

http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/vi...r_collapse.mpeg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edgar
post Jun 27 2007, 11:26 AM
Post #3





Group: Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: 25-June 07
From: Kansas City
Member No.: 1,248



Forget that.

Prove the use of explosives with Newton's first law.

We all believe the collapse of the South Tower due to having seen the videos of the collapse so much - the video forces the observer to think with their eyes, not their brain. It's really quite fascinating.

Thought Experiment:
If you remove all the rubble and debris, you wind up with a 110 some story building with the approx. top 1/3rd sitting at an angle. Now, apply Newton's first law.

The center of gravity of the tilted portion is no longer directly above the core. The core is the main object of the bottom 2/3rds that offers resistance.

Air is less resistant than the core of the building, ergo the top portion should have tumbled off the building onto the street.

I have other theories on this matter which I am also investingating.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 07:14 PM