IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Lawyer Fears 9/11 Mastermind Trial Will Be 'insanity'

painter
post Apr 24 2008, 04:04 PM
Post #1


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



The links below may not work.

Source:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/04/23/ksm.attorney/index.html

Someone needs to send them an amicus brief regarding the NTSB/FDR inconsistencies.





Lawyer fears 9/11 mastermind trial will be 'insanity'

  • Story Highlights
  • Lawyer defending suspected 9/11 mastermind calls waterboarding 'mock execution'

  • Attorney travels to Guantanamo Bay to meet with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

  • Prescott Prince was Navy reservist in Iraq before assigned to case

  • Prince: Statements gained through waterboarding shouldn't be allowed in court
By Kelli Arena and Carol Cratty

CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Prescott Prince is a small-town lawyer who has never taken a death penalty case to trial. Yet he finds himself involved in one of the biggest capital punishment cases this century: He's defending the alleged mastermind of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

He readily acknowledges how his client is perceived as "one of the most reviled people" in the world. But he says it's imperative America give Mohammed a fair trial, just like anyone else accused of a crime.

No civilian court, he says, would accept confessions obtained after a defendant was mistreated. But the CIA admits Mohammed was waterboarded, a controversial interrogation technique that involves simulated drowning.

"I take the position that this is mock execution. ... Colloquially speaking, at least it's torture," Prince says.

The fact whatever Mohammed said during such duress could be used at trial is alarming to Prince.

"That's not the rule of law. That's just insanity." (IMG:http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/tabs/video.gif) Watch waterboarding is "mock execution" »

A Navy reservist who has been called to active duty, Prince, 53, rejects the suggestion that he is less than patriotic for representing an accused terrorist. "I had friends who were at the Pentagon the day it was attacked so I don't accept the concept of 'gee I don't know what it's like.'"

Prince is currently visiting the detention center at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba to meet his client. He was denied a meeting with Mohammed on Wednesday due to procedural problems; he will try again today.

Before Prince headed to Guantanamo, he told CNN he had no idea whether Mohammed will accept him as his lawyer. He says he's gone over what he's going to say "about a hundred times a day."

He's been reading the Koran and has met with psychologists and other lawyers who have represented accused terrorists. "This would not be the first time I've met with a client who initially did not want, if you will, court-appointed counsel," he said. "I've had clients call me almost any name in the book. I've had them refuse to come see me." (IMG:http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/tabs/video.gif) Meet the attorney defending suspected 9/11 mastermind »

Still Prince realizes this is different. Very different.

Mohammed has been in custody since he was caught in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, in 2003. He was transferred from a secret location to Gitmo in 2006. The government says he confessed to his involvement in the September 11, 2001, attacks and many other terrorist plots.

The government in February said six terror suspects, including Mohammed, would go before military commissions and could face the death penalty if it is judged they were involved in the September 11 attacks. The proceedings are governed by the Military Commissions Act, which Congress passed to handle arrestees in the war on terror. (IMG:http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/tabs/interactive.gif) See the terror suspects who could face the death penalty »

The act requires detainees have access to lawyers as well as to any evidence presented against them. They also will have the right to appeal a guilty verdict, potentially through a civilian appeals court and perhaps the U.S. Supreme Court, according to the act. (IMG:http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/tabs/video.gif) Watch general describe charges against al Qaeda suspects »

In the case of Mohammed, the government acknowledged he was subjected to waterboarding, a harsh interrogation technique that many experts believe violates the Geneva Conventions' ban on torture. Waterboarding involves strapping a person to a surface, covering the face with cloth and pouring water over the cloth to imitate the sensation of drowning.

Prince finds that extremely troubling because he says a civilian court would never admit evidence gained through a coerced statement. The government says Mohammed has confessed to 9/11 and other terror plots.

"Even the greenest deputy sheriff or rookie police officer in Skunk Hollow County knows that if you rough up a defendant, anything he says after that is not going to be admitted into court," Prince says. "The officer might not like those rules, but he understands them and will abide by them."

But a judge in a military commission could have it entered into evidence. "We have created a system under the military commissions that says in essence, 'if he was roughed up, but what he says still seems reliable, we'll accept it any way.' And that's just wrong."

Prince says there are other complications. He may not have the chance to cross-examine Mohammed's accusers and may not see all the evidence to be put forward in court. (IMG:http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/tabs/video.gif) Watch families of 9/11 victims push for fair trials »

Prince doesn't believe Mohammed can get a fair trial and says the country risks trashing "our constitutional values when it becomes convenient to do so."

"I don't want to impugn anyone's character, but this is where Ronald Reagan's term 'trust but verify' will come into play," he says.

The military has assigned him a three-person team consisting of another lawyer, an intelligence analyst and a paralegal. The American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers have also teamed up to find volunteers to help Prince and the other lawyers defending accused terrorists at Guantanamo Bay.

Norman Reimer, the executive director of the NACDL, explained the daunting task this way:"It's going to require all of the ingenuity and resources -- not just to defend the accused -- but to defend the American system of justice and what we stand for in the world. That's what this is about."

Two lawyers from Boise, Idaho, have agreed to help Prince. No strangers to terrorism cases, David Nevin and Scott McKay won an acquittal for a Saudi man who faced terror charges.

Prince for years ran a small practice in Richmond, Virginia. But last year, the reservist was called to active duty and spent six months in Iraq. He never thought this would be his next assignment.

"I could have said, 'No,'" he says, before adding, "I don't think I would have been doing honor to myself or honor to my calling."


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cary
post Apr 27 2008, 04:27 PM
Post #2


Ragin Cajun


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,691
Joined: 14-August 06
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Member No.: 5



How perfect for the neocons. Get some inexperienced small town lawyer to defend this guy and then watch him burn.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jo56
post Apr 27 2008, 05:30 PM
Post #3





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,283
Joined: 14-December 06
Member No.: 321



http://www.mcclatchydc.com/226/story/33079.html
http://www.miamiherald.com/guantanamo/story/488156.html
http://www.silobreaker.com/DocumentReader....tem=5_844239364

QUOTE
Navy Capt. Prescott Prince was given orders on Tuesday to defend Pakistani prisoner Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the newspaper said on its Web site.



Isn't it ironic that this lawyer's name is PRESCOTT PRINCE. Is he related to Erik Prince (Blackwater) and/or Prescott Bush? Interesting names is all I can say.

Is he related to the "Prince Family" (Edgar, Erik, etc?). I would focus on how he got the job, and why he was called back up after being retired from the NAVY for many years. Did he have a FAMILIAL (gatekeeper) ROLE to play?


Prescott Prince Bio:
http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/2008/0...ffiliate.56.pdf

This post has been edited by jo56: Apr 27 2008, 05:34 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omega892R09
post Apr 28 2008, 06:41 AM
Post #4





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 2,170
Joined: 29-September 07
From: Hampshire, UK.
Member No.: 2,274



QUOTE (jo56 @ Apr 25 2008, 07:30 PM) *
[b]Isn't it ironic that this lawyer's name is PRESCOTT PRINCE. Is he related to Erik Prince (Blackwater) and/or Prescott Bush? Interesting names is all I can say.

My first thoughts exactly Joe.
Eric Prince - Navy Seal
Prescott Prince - Navy reservist


GHW Bush (father Prescott Bush) - Navy pilot [1]
GW Bush - Air Guard (get out of 'nam free card) with a probably dodgy record if only the full version was known.

[1] I read somewhere that GHW was rescued from his sinking aircaft during WW2, by a sub' I think. I wonder how authentic that story is given the doubts about the deads of a certain Arizona Senator?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 02:37 AM