News For Germany (and Like), 12.1GWh/day from solar. Nukeplants to close. Fukushima!! |

![]() ![]() |
Apr 11 2011, 05:01 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,000 Joined: 7-November 07 From: Prague or France Member No.: 2,452 |
thank you. now i have had quite enough of your patronizing style. banter with yourself in your ivory tower you nuclear power cheerleader. You wanted to see the numbers, so I've just written them for you. It can seem patronizing like in the school when the teacher shows the kids how to count, but I can't do anything about. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) |
|
|
|
Apr 12 2011, 07:44 AM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,896 Joined: 23-October 06 Member No.: 147 |
"But I'm not an engineer at all. I'm a psychologist. My speciality is terrorism."
Oh OK sure got it This post has been edited by bill: Apr 12 2011, 07:52 AM |
|
|
|
Apr 12 2011, 08:31 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,000 Joined: 7-November 07 From: Prague or France Member No.: 2,452 |
"But I'm not an engineer at all. I'm a psychologist. My speciality is terrorism." Oh OK sure got it (blank lines left out) I'm glad bill you're sure that you got it. Best argument in your circles. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) |
|
|
|
Apr 12 2011, 08:44 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,000 Joined: 7-November 07 From: Prague or France Member No.: 2,452 |
here a video of the 15m tsunami which hit the Fukushima plant:
|
|
|
|
Apr 12 2011, 09:04 AM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Group: Active Forum Pilot Posts: 770 Joined: 1-February 09 From: FL Member No.: 4,096 |
here a video of the 15m tsunami which hit the Fukushima plant: <div><object width="480" height="270" id="wat_6042023"><param name="movie" value="http://www.wat.tv/swf2/454437nIc0K116042023"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.wat.tv/swf2/454437nIc0K116042023" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="270"></embed></object></div><div class="watlinks" style="width:480px;font-size:11px; background:#CCCCCC; padding:2px 0 4px 0; text-align: center;"><a target="_blank" class="waturl" href="http://www.wat.tv/video/japan-15m-tsunami-fukushima-3li1z_31wod_.html" title="Vidéo Japan 15m Tsunami: Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant at the moment of impact! - April 9, 2011 sur wat.tv"><strong>Japan 15m Tsunami: Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant at the moment of impact! - April 9, 2011</strong></a> Vidéo <a class="waturl altuser" href="http://www.wat.tv/mirrorthis2010" title="Retrouvez toutes les vidéos mirrorthis2010 sur wat.tv">mirrorthis2010</a> sélectionnée dans TV/Séries </div> Doesn't appear that the facility was built very well. If they had put their generators on the west side of the plant, instead of the ocean side, they might have been able to save the plant. But Big Power Corps don't always make the best decisions when their first priority is the bottom line, rather than safety. This post has been edited by DoYouEverWonder: Apr 12 2011, 09:04 AM |
|
|
|
Apr 12 2011, 03:27 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,000 Joined: 7-November 07 From: Prague or France Member No.: 2,452 |
Doesn't appear that the facility was built very well. If they had put their generators on the west side of the plant, instead of the ocean side, they might have been able to save the plant. But Big Power Corps don't always make the best decisions when their first priority is the bottom line, rather than safety. Yeah, it wasn't and the wave looks terribly at the video when shatters against the plant. Now I don't wonder it rendered most of the systems there inoperable - when we see on other videos what such waves did with the whole cities. If they would build the plant just 10 meters or so higher it most probably didn't happen - and the terrain profile makes it perfectly possible there to build it higher. At least they should have the emergency systems somewhere up the hill. I'm sure that the Tepco was "saving" some money there - I've read somewhere that some Japanese Diet representatives were notoriously warning Tepco director that the plant is not secure against Tsunamies. The other Fukushima Daini plant is just the 10 meters higher - as I see in the elevation map - and so they managed there even the complete powerloss for several days without any meltdowns, venting, explosions and radioactive water leakages. Also I wonder why they for example didn't have the passive catalytic converters there - which are prescribed in PWR reactor halls - converting oxygen and hydrogen into the water without explosion - to keep the hydrogen under explosive ratio. Another badly "saved" money... I wonder where the'll get the money to indemnify the people in the affected areas. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif) Fortunately the reactors were in the containments with the large pressure suppression chambers- if the japanese would be so stupid like the Soviets with the Chernobyl, and were saving the money even on the containments in the 70ties -then it would be really bad. Like this looks the Fukushima "zone" from the measurements by NNSA from 04/04: Radiation Monitoring Data from Fukushima Area 04/04/2011 View more presentations from US Department of Energy (map at page 4) - relatively still "safe" level if one wants to stay there whole the year is the lightblue area. The rest depends on what is the ratio of the Cs-137 there, which the measurements don't show. I think the assessment about which parts of the orange and yellow marked areas will be unhabitable for long time without extensive active decontamination will come after the summer monzun rains which will take portion of the surface contamination by the long-half-life isotopes with and disperse it in the ocean. The levels except the orange strip are mostly like the decay and first monzun could take the contamination levels down to safe levels, but the distrust in companies like Tepco will persist I think long time. They definitely should envision the possibility of the Tsunami and do something about - especially when it was public secret in Japan the plant is not safe against it. |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2011, 12:50 AM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
(IMG:http://www.esa.int/images/Sendai_earthquake_coseismic_L.jpg)
Remember those under water pyramids near Japan? They weren't built underwater. http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM9PL6UPLG_index_1.html |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2011, 03:03 AM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,000 Joined: 7-November 07 From: Prague or France Member No.: 2,452 |
Looks like there was a big tension released between the plates. I wonder how much up the Honshu moved. |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2011, 09:58 AM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 4,959 Joined: 1-April 07 Member No.: 875 |
Looks like there was a big tension released between the plates. I wonder how much up the Honshu moved. It's the 20,000 foot drop, just offshore. It's more dropping than moving. i think, that the pacific plate is pushing in (towards japan) at the bottom of this 20,000 foot drop, and Japan, at the top of this underwater escarpment is wedged against Asia. This could cause part of the island, to drop down into the ocean, as that continental shelf edge becomes more compromised, and slumps down. Look out for more tsunamis. |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2011, 03:52 PM
Post
#30
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,000 Joined: 7-November 07 From: Prague or France Member No.: 2,452 |
Here I've found a tsunami explanation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K80xh7LYgWg
|
|
|
|
May 26 2011, 12:37 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,896 Joined: 23-October 06 Member No.: 147 |
250,000 tons of waste stored for 100,000 years in a safe place Nothing man has done has even come close to this Onkalo parts of this video are blocked from Germany Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AWcle6lM_Q |
|
|
|
May 26 2011, 02:50 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 1,000 Joined: 7-November 07 From: Prague or France Member No.: 2,452 |
250,000 tons of waste stored for 100,000 years in a safe place Nothing man has done has even come close to this Onkalo parts of this video are blocked from Germany Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AWcle6lM_Q Oh, scary. In reality we cannot afford to store spent nuclear fuel for 100 000 years - it would be wasting valuable stuff - basically we should burn it as fuel in the 4th generatin plants, that's I think much better solution than dig holes in mountains and put there something which can be used as fuel for energy productiion. In my opinion the R&D should continue, because in contemporary nuclear plants of 2nd and 3rd generation there is used much less than 1% of energy contained in the fuel, so the rest of more than 99% rests in the fuel and I think it should be used rather than stored for high costs. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 02:09 AM |