IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
911review.org Now Gone

NP1Mike
post Mar 18 2014, 11:58 PM
Post #1





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 422
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



I was doing some research just now and discovered that http://www.911review.org/ has recently bit the bullet.
This is unfortunate.

Does anyone here know a good way to download the site using the Wayback Machine?
It still can be viewed there, but I don't have software that works to download the site.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
snakken
post Mar 19 2014, 12:32 AM
Post #2





Group: Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: 11-June 08
Member No.: 3,545



Can always go to archive.org and some things are there. Go to http://www.archive.org and enter the page you want to find. Once I do that for This site here is the URL:

https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.911review.org/

Sheri
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Mar 19 2014, 12:47 AM
Post #3





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Mar 19 2014, 03:58 PM) *
I was doing some research just now and discovered that http://www.911review.org/ has recently bit the bullet.
This is unfortunate.



Was the passing of bullet-biting 9/11review.org all that "unfortunate"
if you were less than aware that 9/11 Truth.CON was not what you were after ?
IYCWIM

Check http://www.911review.com/911review/

MikeR

This post has been edited by MikeR: Mar 19 2014, 12:51 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paranoia
post Mar 19 2014, 04:35 AM
Post #4


dig deeper
Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 1,033
Joined: 16-October 06
From: dc
Member No.: 96



QUOTE (MikeR @ Mar 18 2014, 11:47 PM) *
Was the passing of bullet-biting 9/11review.org all that "unfortunate"
if you were less than aware that 9/11 Truth.CON was not what you were after ?
IYCWIM

Check http://www.911review.com/911review/

MikeR


i have no immediate recollection of the material on 911review.ORG, but the site that criticizes it - 911review.COM - pushes Jim Hoffman's pentagon disinfo heavily, and even defends that shill and his lies. as such, i can say that for me at least, the site is suspect. for the record, in their defense, this is what 911review.ORG has to say:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/sear...v=2&ct=clnk


btw-

QUOTE (mikeR)
...that 9/11 Truth.CON was not what you were after?

please stop goading and provoking, you are fee to share your insights but do not incite.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Mar 19 2014, 05:25 AM
Post #5





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (paranoia @ Mar 19 2014, 08:35 PM) *
please stop goading and provoking, you are fee to share your insights but do not incite.


If you think anything I ever wrote is any sort of incite,
one of us inadvertently missed the intended insight ;-)

I've long since given up writing to please all the readers on the 'Net, but
glad to meet one of the targeted intelligents: your response is much appreciated.

MikeR
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paranoia
post Mar 19 2014, 07:21 AM
Post #6


dig deeper
Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 1,033
Joined: 16-October 06
From: dc
Member No.: 96



mikeR, i admit, i may have misunderstood what you were implying - may have been the way it was worded that confused me.
sorry!

cheers.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Mar 19 2014, 08:06 PM
Post #7





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (paranoia @ Mar 19 2014, 11:21 PM) *
mikeR, i admit, i may have misunderstood what you were implying - may have been the way it was worded that confused me.
sorry!

cheers.gif


Hey, thanks.... no offense taken ... I'm impressed you tried to decode my confusion...
could be a bonus for both of us .... I admit I do tend to write in code....
in part 'cos I don't even know the right questions, let alone have any correct answers,
Sometimes our best effort is to get people to ask the questions
that point to the information we so desperately need,
rather than just posting a lame line that our myopia demands
(yes, I admit I am as short-sighted as anybody
looking for anything the PTB hides in plane site:-)

BTW on a not-entirely unrelated train of thin thought, I am dismayed that
some P4T appear to be refusing to even look at certain evidence
until they have scientific proof of the phenomona that my eyes clearly tell me
is/are slowly killing us all...

but maybe you couldn't possibly comment anyway :-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NP1Mike
post Mar 22 2014, 09:29 PM
Post #8





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 422
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



QUOTE (snakken @ Mar 18 2014, 11:32 PM) *
Can always go to archive.org and some things are there. Go to http://www.archive.org and enter the page you want to find. Once I do that for This site here is the URL:

https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.911review.org/

Sheri



Thanks Sheri I will check it out.

However I can't let you get away that easily. smile.gif

As I have said several times now, whenever an infrequent poster comes along here (and you certainly fit that bill, making your debut post here in response to mine) I become extremely curious.

What was it exactly that made you come back to this site almost SIX years after you registered
to make your suggestion in a less-than-groundbreaking post?
And your very first post at that!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th November 2019 - 03:00 PM