Jennifer Spell / Matt Lauer, Their 9/11 stories Options

[elcounte]

Only recently have listened to Jennifer's Spells interview as a "witness" to the south tower impact, allegedly from Flt175. In it she claims that "the plane came in and circled back out over New Jersey and then came back and hit the tower". I'm paraphrasing, but it is essentially what she stated in her interview. Up until this time I have been calling Matt Lauer "Matt Liar" because of his on-air statement of "we just saw a plane circling the building". Add to this the hard to find British cgi clip that was shown over there that showed the plane coming in from the north and doing a virtual 180 into the south tower, well, it makes me think someone definitely got their lines crossed. A few questions I have from this are, why didn't Jennifer film the plane coming in and going back out over NJ? Of course, we know her 9/11 footage is a terrible fabrication of sound and visual representation of what actually happened, but I do think there may be a shred of truth in the story of a "plane" coming in and circling back over NJ, simply because Matt Lauers story mimics it. It's a guess at best, but I'd like to know how some of you feel about this. The Brits knew they screwed up with the CGI footage they broadcast, no aircraft ever conceived could have pulled off the maneuver it depicts and had enough momentum to have penetrated the steel beams. Thoughts?

[amazed!]

Welcome to the forum Elcounte.

I'm not familiar with Jennifer Spell, and I don't think much of Matt Lauer, but the events of the day were staged and the official story is nonsense.

[kawika]

Only recently have listened to Jennifer's Spells interview as a "witness" to the south tower impact, allegedly from Flt175. In it she claims that "the plane came in and circled back out over New Jersey and then came back and hit the tower". I'm paraphrasing, but it is essentially what she stated in her interview. Up until this time I have been calling Matt Lauer "Matt Liar" because of his on-air statement of "we just saw a plane circling the building". Add to this the hard to find British cgi clip that was shown over there that showed the plane coming in from the north and doing a virtual 180 into the south tower, well, it makes me think someone definitely got their lines crossed. A few questions I have from this are, why didn't Jennifer film the plane coming in and going back out over NJ? Of course, we know her 9/11 footage is a terrible fabrication of sound and visual representation of what actually happened, but I do think there may be a shred of truth in the story of a "plane" coming in and circling back over NJ, simply because Matt Lauers story mimics it. It's a guess at best, but I'd like to know how some of you feel about this. The Brits knew they screwed up with the CGI footage they broadcast, no aircraft ever conceived could have pulled off the maneuver it depicts and had enough momentum to have penetrated the steel beams. Thoughts?

We need links to properly review your claim.