Dr. Judy Wood, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons, She claims "thermite" is misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement. Options

[pookzta]

Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and currently serves on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.

Dr. Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including
Experimental Stress Analysis,
Engineering Mechanics,
Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
Strength of Materials Testing
Is this what Eisenhower warned us of?

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/short/shortpics/bubbler.jpg)
Figure 1. My intellectual integrity prevents me from calling this a collapse. This is why I have chosen to stand up. My conscience leaves me no other choice.


From 1999 to 2006 Dr. Wood has been an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina. Before moving to Clemson she spent three years as a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Tech.
One of Dr. Wood's research interests is biomimicry, or applying the mechanical structures of biological materials to engineering design using engineering materials. Other recent research has investigated the deformation behavior of materials and structures with complex geometries and complex material properties, such as fiber-reinforced composite materials and biological materials. Dr. Wood is an expert in the use of moiré interferometry, a full-field optical method that is used in stress analysis, as well as materials characterization and other types of interference. In recent years, Dr. Wood and her students have developed optical systems with various wavelengths and waveguides. Dr. Wood has over 60 technical publications in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and edited monographs and special technical reports.

Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.


What destroyed World Trade Center buildings #1 & #2?
(IMG:http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/46_wtc1spiretodustjg4.jpg)

See a video of the spire vaporizing into dust: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goGGQhhTcDY

There is a wealth of information here: http://www.drjudywood.com

Could Dr. Steven Jones be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement with his nano-thermite hypothesis?

This video seems to think so: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9Iv_4ZfNI

Please check it out,

-Abe

This post has been edited by pookzta: Mar 1 2010, 10:00 PM

[pookzta]

i just added a new video that calls Dr. Jones and the nano-thermite theory into question

[Ricochet]

Virginia Tech is CIA run.

[lunk]

(IMG:http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/46_wtc1spiretodustjg4.jpg)

Interesting, the spire, is left behind, leans, and,
instead of falling over, collapses straight down,
leaving just dust.
...or vaporizes in the air.

What do we know of, that can vaporize steel?
A laser perhaps, from an orbiting satellite?
That's a guess. We do not know if we have this technology.

We do have nuclear reactors, we know that when a nuclear reaction goes super critical, iron vaporizes, like everything else,
except reflective material,
shiny things, and perhaps stacks of white paper.

The radiated heat can reflect off certain surfaces, and paper is a poor conductor of heat, and unlike a dark surface, a white surface is reflective, too.

Remember all the little pieces of paper in the dust clouds that day, the one thing that was not disintegrated to dust?

So, maybe it is more a question of what we know they have, and did use, versus, what we guess, that they could possible have, and may have used, to bring down the towers.

And how would they cover up, using what we know they do have?
By getting somebody to theorize on what they know, they don't have,
to make us think, that they are even more advanced than we think?

People would be freaked, around the world, if it was known that the suitcase nuke story, all over the media just before 9/11, was the fall back story if something went wrong, in their plane plan excuse, for the collapse (edit added: demolition) of the towers.

Cedar, has a pleasant aroma,
but some wood, just smells funny.
imo.

Perhaps some small fourth generation fission/fusion devices were used,
to take out the core, the residual heat and radiation, vaporized everything above it, for as long as it took the towers to fall, obscured by smoke and dust, and government coverup.

and they probably used thermite as well.

This post has been edited by lunk: Mar 1 2010, 11:53 PM

[pookzta]

(IMG:http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/46_wtc1spiretodustjg4.jpg)

Interesting, the spire, is left behind, leans, and,
instead of falling over, collapses straight down,
leaving just dust.
...or vaporizes in the air.

What do we know of, that can vaporize steel?
A laser perhaps, from an orbiting satellite?
That's a guess. We do not know if we have this technology.

We do have nuclear reactors, we know that when a nuclear reaction goes super critical, iron vaporizes, like everything else,
except reflective material,
shiny things, and perhaps stacks of white paper.

The radiated heat can reflect off certain surfaces, and paper is a poor conductor of heat, and unlike a dark surface, a white surface is reflective, too.

Remember all the little pieces of paper in the dust clouds that day, the one thing that was not disintegrated to dust?

So, maybe it is more a question of what we know they have, and did use, versus, what we guess, that they could possible have, and may have used, to bring down the towers.

And how would they cover up, using what we know they do have?
By getting somebody to theorize on what they know, they don't have,
to make us think, that they are even more advanced than we think?

People would be freaked, around the world, if it was known that the suitcase nuke story, all over the media just before 9/11, was the fall back story if something went wrong, in their plane plan excuse, for the collapse (edit added: demolition) of the towers.

Cedar, has a pleasant aroma,
but some wood, just smells funny.
imo.

Perhaps some small fourth generation fission/fusion devices were used,
to take out the core, the residual heat and radiation, vaporized everything above it, for as long as it took the towers to fall, obscured by smoke and dust, and government coverup.

and they probably used thermite as well.

if you check out her website she talks about the Hutchinson Effect which basically is a guy that has learned to tune electromagnetic energy so that it only interacts with specific materials, using Nicholas Tesla technology.

she theorizes that Directed Energy Weapons, possibly HAARP or some other energy weapon, was used to destroy the WTC buildings 1 and 2. Building 7 was different, yet Dr. Jones and his nano-thermite theory treate them all the same.

this might explain why the paper was left. thermite would definitely have burned up the paper. but apparently this process of "dustification" does not generate much heat which is why all the paper was left.

Dustification does not equal Vaporization.

please check out her website for more details, she has lots of evidence.

Dr. Jones seems to be a misinforment that is misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement... at least it appears that way.

-Abe

[KP50]

Once Dr Judy Wood tried to claim that the molten metal under the towers was not in fact molten, then I threw her into the disinformation basket. This isn't a binary operation, the people who destroyed the towers are allowed to use more than one method, she does not need to try to destroy all other theories so that hers can succeed.

But there is a dedicated band of people who support her, although it could just be the same person with many different forum personas.

[pookzta]

Once Dr Judy Wood tried to claim that the molten metal under the towers was not in fact molten, then I threw her into the disinformation basket. This isn't a binary operation, the people who destroyed the towers are allowed to use more than one method, she does not need to try to destroy all other theories so that hers can succeed.

But there is a dedicated band of people who support her, although it could just be the same person with many different forum personas.

but there is very little proof of molten metal... many of the pictures are weak or edited looking, and there are pictures of workers down in the bases of the WTC buildings shortly after the events.

i once was a huge pusher of the molten metal thing, but then I realized I was putting more into the testimonies then was necessary. for example, molten metal could have been present for a few days, but not weeks as the nano-thermite supporters suggest.

also, if nano-thermite was used, u would expect tons and tons of molten steel, and tons of fire damage. there was very little fire damage to the building, tons and tons of paper peices survived, the dust was reportedly cool, and more.

definitely keep an open mind.

i honestly believe Dr. Jones is an operative after reading more of Judy's stuff. after learning about his role in the Cold Fusion / Room Temp Fusion cover up, and after learning that he kicked Judy out of scholars for 9/11 truth because she made a post about there not being any planes...

Dr. Jones's credibility has been called into question, and now I consider Dr. Judy Wood an equally worthy scientist, if not a superior one.

Dr. Jones seems like disinfo.

just my 2 cents anyway

-Abe

[KP50]

but there is very little proof of molten metal... many of the pictures are weak or edited looking, and there are pictures of workers down in the bases of the WTC buildings shortly after the events.

i once was a huge pusher of the molten metal thing, but then I realized I was putting more into the testimonies then was necessary. for example, molten metal could have been present for a few days, but not weeks as the nano-thermite supporters suggest.

also, if nano-thermite was used, u would expect tons and tons of molten steel, and tons of fire damage. there was very little fire damage to the building, tons and tons of paper peices survived, the dust was reportedly cool, and more.

definitely keep an open mind.

i honestly believe Dr. Jones is an operative after reading more of Judy's stuff. after learning about his role in the Cold Fusion / Room Temp Fusion cover up, and after learning that he kicked Judy out of scholars for 9/11 truth because she made a post about there not being any planes...

Dr. Jones's credibility has been called into question, and now I consider Dr. Judy Wood an equally worthy scientist, if not a superior one.

Dr. Jones seems like disinfo.

just my 2 cents anyway

-Abe

Do you have to follow anyone? Just assess all the evidence on its own right but don't set up anyone as a hero who will save the day.

There were extraordinary temperatures below ground irrespective of the state of the metal. It points to a cataclysmic event in the basement levels of both towers just prior to collapse - hence the ground shaking. It wasn't any external weapon that caused that event. Once Dr Wood tries to assign every bit of evidence to her view of a beam weapon, trying to dismiss parts that don't fit in, then she is promoting disinformation.

[pookzta]

Do you have to follow anyone? Just assess all the evidence on its own right but don't set up anyone as a hero who will save the day.

There were extraordinary temperatures below ground irrespective of the state of the metal. It points to a cataclysmic event in the basement levels of both towers just prior to collapse - hence the ground shaking. It wasn't any external weapon that caused that event. Once Dr Wood tries to assign every bit of evidence to her view of a beam weapon, trying to dismiss parts that don't fit in, then she is promoting disinformation.

that's exactly what I'm doing, is thinking for myself and not following anyone. I will admit, I am using my intellect to analyze evidence that OTHERS have collected since I didnt take photos or walk through ground zero on my own, so that is all i meant by following. I should have meant supporting. The theory which I support the most is the one that Dr. Wood puts forward, as Energy Weapons seem to be the most likely cause of the dustification of the WTC buildings. You should check out her website, there are tons of weird things, such as cars being on fire but paper not catching on fire... office cabinets being mangled and warped yet the papers are unharmed within, giant steel pieces being bent and twisted in mind-bending ways (pun hehe)... very interesting webstie and photographic evidence she has. easy to analyze on your own, no faith necessary. just look at the pics for yourself and see if you draw the same conclusions!


also very important to point out that Dr. Judy Wood is one of the few people that has fired law suits against NIST for their false data and lies. She has filed 3 or so Qui Tam cases against them.

See here: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html

also, she has been the subject of many disinfo attempts. Dr. Steven Jones sent a fellow "Scholar for 9/11 Truth" named Dr. Greg Jenkins to do an ambush interview of Dr. Wood.

Dr. Jenkins showed up with 2 video cameras and lighting to an event that Dr. Wood was only attending, but not speaking at. He ambushed her after the event and convinced her to do an interview. During the interview. Dr. Jenkins took a very particular role of trying to make Dr. Wood look foolish, avoiding her strong points and trying to focus on weak, and often irrelevant, points. It was very weird to see the video.

Here is a video recap of their interview: http://www.mefeedia.com/watch/27626168

(i saw the full, unedited interview, and it was rather lengthy and boring. the video above high lights the most significant moments and questions.)

[DoYouEverWonder]

that's exactly what I'm doing, is thinking for myself and not following anyone. I will admit, I am using my intellect to analyze evidence that OTHERS have collected since I didnt take photos or walk through ground zero on my own, so that is all i meant by following. I should have meant supporting. The theory which I support the most is the one that Dr. Wood puts forward, as Energy Weapons seem to be the most likely cause of the dustification of the WTC buildings. You should check out her website, there are tons of weird things, such as cars being on fire but paper not catching on fire... office cabinets being mangled and warped yet the papers are unharmed within, giant steel pieces being bent and twisted in mind-bending ways (pun hehe)... very interesting webstie and photographic evidence she has. easy to analyze on your own, no faith necessary. just look at the pics for yourself and see if you draw the same conclusions!


also very important to point out that Dr. Judy Wood is one of the few people that has fired law suits against NIST for their false data and lies. She has filed 3 or so Qui Tam cases against them.

See here: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html

also, she has been the subject of many disinfo attempts. Dr. Steven Jones sent a fellow "Scholar for 9/11 Truth" named Dr. Greg Jenkins to do an ambush interview of Dr. Wood.

Dr. Jenkins showed up with 2 video cameras and lighting to an event that Dr. Wood was only attending, but not speaking at. He ambushed her after the event and convinced her to do an interview. During the interview. Dr. Jenkins took a very particular role of trying to make Dr. Wood look foolish, avoiding her strong points and trying to focus on weak, and often irrelevant, points. It was very weird to see the video.

Here is a video recap of their interview: http://www.mefeedia.com/watch/27626168

(i saw the full, unedited interview, and it was rather lengthy and boring. the video above high lights the most significant moments and questions.)

I don't think anyone needs to try to make JW look foolish. She does a good enough job on her own.

JW is the type of 'researcher' that comes up with a theory and then makes the evidence fit the theory. That is not good or credible research.

BTW: If anyone got ambushed it was Steven Jones who made the mistake of starting out with Jim Fetzer. When Jones found out where Fetzer was coming from, Jones split from the group and they've been trying to discredit him ever since. Fetzer took JW under his wing and convinced her she was a genius and anyone who didn't see things her way was to be discredited.

[pookzta]

I don't think anyone needs to try to make JW look foolish. She does a good enough job on her own.

JW is the type of 'researcher' that comes up with a theory and then makes the evidence fit the theory. That is not good or credible research.

BTW: If anyone got ambushed it was Steven Jones who made the mistake of starting out with Jim Fetzer. When Jones found out where Fetzer was coming from, Jones split from the group and they've been trying to discredit him ever since. Fetzer took JW under his wing and convinced her she was a genius and anyone who didn't see things her way was to be discredited.

more evidence that Dr. Judy Wood is legit and Dr. Steven Jones is not.

(also, Judy Wood and Fetzer have parted ways because Judy discovered Fetzer was trying to discredit Hutchinson and his research on elecetromagnetic energy. It seems that Jones and Fetzer both seem hell bent on disproving Wood and trying to divert attention away from her theory about Space Wars directed energy weapons.)

In this video, you will see that Dr. Judy Wood has also filed several legal documents with NIST, called RFC documents, which are "Request For Correction" documents. These documents can be legally filed with NIST as a means to bring false or incorrect data to their attention, and to suggest the correction.

Not only has Judy filed RFC's with NIST to correct their data, but Dr. Steven Jones has NOT filed ANY RFC's with NIST. If Dr. Jones was so confident in his nano-thermite findings, he would definitely have submitted RFC's to NIST so that they could account for the 'new-found nano-thermite'.

The closer I look, the more evidence I see, the more this looks like Dr. Jones is an operative meant to mislead the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false path, to prevent us from finding out the truth.

Dr. Judy Wood has already answered 3 of my emails and we are having an indepth discussion, which is something very few 9/11 truth-seeking leaders have ever done with me. She seems very genuine in her question answering, and her encouraging me to think for myself and to look into things for myself.

Here is the video proof discussing how Dr. Wood has filed RFCs with NIST, and how Dr. Jones has not filed any RFCs with NIST: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AGBTuFKxyc

This post has been edited by pookzta: Mar 2 2010, 07:43 AM

[GroundPounder]

and then there is always ed ward with elevated tritium levels....

[pookzta]

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D - 'The New Hiroshima' Presentation (Part 1):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1JFCpFd6CA

Dr. Judy Wood, The Hutchinson Effect, & Focused Electromagnetic Energy (Who Will You Tell?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0EsJhEFz9A

There is a wealth of information here: http://www.drjudywood.com

Also, check out this Alaskan magnometer data. It seems that immediately before the Towers were brought down there was a surge in magnetic (electromagnetic?) activity observed in Alaska. This is where HAARP is located (compare the UT times to the graph, because the graph is in UT time):

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/mpics/akmap.gif)

WTC1 gets hole 08:46:26 AM 12:46 UT
WTC2 gets hole 09:02:54 AM 13:03 UT
Pentagon Event 09:30-9:40 AM (13:35 UT)
WTC2 goes poof 09:59:04 AM 13:59 UT
Shanksville, PA Event 10:03-10:10 AM (14:05 UT)
WTC1 goes poof 10:28:31 AM 14:29 UT

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/mpics/magchart2_ss.jpg)

taken from: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html


This definitely appears as though HAARP started warming up before the buildings were hit, and increased in output power, disturbing the Alaskan magnetosphere, at the exact same time that the attacks began, peaking in intensity when the buildings were brought down at 14:00PM UT / 2:00PM UT.

Very interesting stuff...

Lastly, Dr. Judy Wood has had an ongoing law suit with several companies over 9/11. She is suing them for covering up the truth and being involved in 9/11. Her court case has reached the Supreme Court but no one knows about it because the many corrupt insiders within the 9/11 Truth Movement have been trying to suppress it from getting out to the public and have been trying to discredit Dr. Wood. Look:
(IMG:http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs483.snc3/26465_819259076229_14802233_46160188_7960697_n.jpg)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Could Dr. Steven Jones be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement with his nano-thermite hypothesis?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9Iv_4ZfNI

-More info on Dr. Jones and his possible role as a disinformation operative:

1. http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...uble_with_jones

2. http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/cc/CB.html

3. http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60

4. http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html#Thermite

5. http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ7.html


Please check it out,

-Abe

[pookzta]

ATTENTION MODERATORS: This is very important news! Dr. Judy Wood has already filed several Qui Tam complaints, DQA, and RFC complaints with the justice department! Recently her Qui Tam case was accepted by the Supreme Court! We need to get this information out to the 9/11 Truth Seekers out there, because Dr. Steven Jones is attempting to mislead this movement down a false path, just like he did with Cold Fusion! Please read this and consider it before deleting it! PLEASE! See recent Supreme Court document in this thread. We need to spread the word!

Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and currently serves on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/home/Wood.jpg)

Dr. Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including
Experimental Stress Analysis,
Engineering Mechanics,
Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
Strength of Materials Testing
Is this what Eisenhower warned us of?

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/short/shortpics/bubbler.jpg)
Figure 1. My intellectual integrity prevents me from calling this a collapse. This is why I have chosen to stand up. My conscience leaves me no other choice.


From 1999 to 2006 Dr. Wood has been an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina. Before moving to Clemson she spent three years as a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Tech.
One of Dr. Wood's research interests is biomimicry, or applying the mechanical structures of biological materials to engineering design using engineering materials. Other recent research has investigated the deformation behavior of materials and structures with complex geometries and complex material properties, such as fiber-reinforced composite materials and biological materials. Dr. Wood is an expert in the use of moiré interferometry, a full-field optical method that is used in stress analysis, as well as materials characterization and other types of interference. In recent years, Dr. Wood and her students have developed optical systems with various wavelengths and waveguides. Dr. Wood has over 60 technical publications in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and edited monographs and special technical reports.

Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.


What destroyed World Trade Center buildings #1 & #2?
(IMG:http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/whypics/46_wtc1spiretodustjg4.jpg)

See a video of the spire vaporizing into dust: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goGGQhhTcDY

Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D - 'The New Hiroshima' Presentation (Part 1):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1JFCpFd6CA

Dr. Judy Wood, The Hutchinson Effect, & Focused Electromagnetic Energy (Who Will You Tell?): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0EsJhEFz9A

There is a wealth of information here: http://www.drjudywood.com

Also, check out this Alaskan magnometer data. It seems that immediately before the Towers were brought down there was a surge in magnetic (electromagnetic?) activity observed in Alaska. This is where HAARP is located (compare the UT times to the graph, because the graph is in UT time):

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/mpics/akmap.gif)

WTC1 gets hole 08:46:26 AM 12:46 UT
WTC2 gets hole 09:02:54 AM 13:03 UT
Pentagon Event 09:30-9:40 AM (13:35 UT)
WTC2 goes poof 09:59:04 AM 13:59 UT
Shanksville, PA Event 10:03-10:10 AM (14:05 UT)
WTC1 goes poof 10:28:31 AM 14:29 UT

(IMG:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/mpics/magchart2_ss.jpg)

taken from: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html


This definitely appears as though HAARP started warming up before the buildings were hit, and increased in output power, disturbing the Alaskan magnetosphere, at the exact same time that the attacks began, peaking in intensity when the buildings were brought down at 14:00PM UT / 2:00PM UT.

Very interesting stuff...

Lastly, Dr. Judy Wood has had an ongoing law suit with several companies over 9/11. She is suing them for covering up the truth and being involved in 9/11. Her court case has reached the Supreme Court but no one knows about it because the many corrupt insiders within the 9/11 Truth Movement have been trying to suppress it from getting out to the public and have been trying to discredit Dr. Wood. Look:
(IMG:http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs483.snc3/26465_819259076229_14802233_46160188_7960697_n.jpg)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Could Dr. Steven Jones be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement with his nano-thermite hypothesis?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9Iv_4ZfNI

-More info on Dr. Jones and his possible role as a disinformation operative:

1. http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...uble_with_jones

2. http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/cc/CB.html

3. http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60

4. http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html#Thermite

5. http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ7.html


Please check it out,

-Abe

[amazed!]

About a month ago I called an attorney whose name and phone were listed on the court document in the Qui Tam action by Wood. He informed me that the action is now over, no joy.

[pookzta]

About a month ago I called an attorney whose name and phone were listed on the court document in the Qui Tam action by Wood. He informed me that the action is now over, no joy.

perhaps the case was shot down?

[DoYouEverWonder]

About a month ago I called an attorney whose name and phone were listed on the court document in the Qui Tam action by Wood. He informed me that the action is now over, no joy.

It's very similar to the case that Bev Harris filed against Diebold and is mainly used when someone wants to make some money, which Bev did. It's not the kind of case that would ever result in anyone getting criminally charged or to be the road to a real investigation.

[KP50]

Pookzta,

You seem to be missing my main point - the below ground temperatures were extraordinary under all 3 buildings, this is well documented. By claiming this is disinformation, she is running with the debunkers. It is incredibly hard to account for all of the events at the WTC with just one type of destructive process and if you go down the Dr JW route, you are left with no planes and a magical beam weapon. Try running with that and see how far you get.

[GroundPounder]

It is incredibly hard to account for all of the events at the WTC with just one type of destructive process

agreed. did i mention the elevated tritium levels (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

This post has been edited by GroundPounder: Mar 4 2010, 07:37 AM

[SanderO]

A single event to destroy the towers would be something like a massive bomb which contained all the energy to blast enough of the structure to have what remained above to topple down in a gravity driven collapse.

The twins did not have a single event lower down and a single gravity driven collapse. There were multiple events in their destruction. WTC 7 might have a single event, lower down which destroyed 8 stories of the core and the top section dropped down and the perimeter followed by a small fraction of a second and fell inward.

The twins most likely had a series of large "explosive" events as well as smaller high energy events which weakened parts of the structure and coupled with explosives destroyed the structural integrity locally and allowed the blast wave to break large sections of the facade apart and topple over away from the towers. The multiple events can be seen in the *branches* of the explosive plume - each one being a distinct event.

The explosions in the south tower did not have enough energy to blast parts of it into the north tower. The facade of the north tower was undamaged by the south tower coming down from whatever explosive and incendiaries were used to destroy the south tower.

It's likely that the facade acted like a membrane though made up of staggered 10x36 panels which were supported on each side by 19 massive "tree columns. The facade membrane acted like a blast curtain absorbing the energy of the explosions in the core. The corners were freed with incendiaries and explosives to that the square tube became 4 separated tall panels made up of the prefabricated panels. The floors slabs held them up and resisted lateral forces (wind loads). But when they were destroyed the core blast shock waves were transmitted through the floor slabs which did two things - they pulverized then powder as the were forced into the inside of the facade membrane. This busted the facade membrane and pushed it out and over without the corners to even hold it up. The house of "cards" fell out.

The core structure was blasted and burned apart at various heights. The cutters probably were set off all at the same time and several explosions were set off to prepare for the final series of larger core explosions at multiple floors beginning at the crash site. The were probably set at 5 or so elevations in the building and went off simultaneously in a vertical stacked series of "typical" CDs of the core perimeter. With that destroyed the floors had no interior support at the core and were blasted out toward the membrane. Most of this was concealed by the first large explosion at the crash site after the first CD sequence of the top was complete.

Finally laterally unsupported core sections were too tall to stand, but with little lateral forces on them and with their seats probably cut at angles they slipped and then gravity collapsed them down.

This post has been edited by SanderO: Mar 4 2010, 09:43 AM