IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Wtc7, Ua93 And The Rebuilding Of 7 In 2002

Carl Bank
post Apr 26 2008, 08:07 PM
Post #1





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,114
Joined: 21-October 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 121



Just stumbled across this:

http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573

some quotes:

QUOTE
What is becoming clearer to me are the true intentions of the rogues within our government who conspired to shock and awe the American people into supporting a radical shift in American foreign and domestic policies. These criminals were intent on creating a scenario complete with a plausible reason for the collapse of WTC7. I believe that the planners of 9/11 originally wanted to counter the claims of potential conspiracy theory “wackos” that WTC7 fell for the same reasons that caused the collapse of WCT1 and WTC2: because a plane hit it! I believe that WTC7 was the actual intended target of flight 93. I believe that flight 93 was, to the surprise of the rogues running the operation, shot down by some true American patriot who was performing his or her duty. I feel this person slipped by the efforts of the rogues who tried everything in their power to prevent the existing national defense procedures from operating successfully.

Had flight 93 actually hit WTC7, it would have served as an improbable but relatively reasonable explanation for the collapse of all three buildings. Science, witnesses, video and forensic evidence indicate that the main towers were brought down by controlled demolition and not as a result of any plane impact or raging fires. Still, the claim that the first two towers collapsed as a result of the damaging impact of aircrafts filled with jet fuel might serve as a reasonable explanation for what happened. On the other hand, the collapse of WTC7 – despite not having been hit by a plane- has caused people to reach for any explanation they could dream up and believe regardless of how implausible! These people look around frantically for scientific support for their unsupported theories, yet they ignore all of the other suspicious evidence surrounding the mystery of WTC7. They blind themselves to everything from comments by Silverstein himself to the dramatic video evidence and the revealing statements (and documentation) made by members of our government who were tasked with protecting us on that very day.

It is very important to pay close attention to the lack of public, official and media attention to WTC7. Most people do not know that there even was a WTC7. Most people don’t know the circumstances surrounding its collapse and have never seen a video of the collapse. Most people don’t know that this building has already been rebuilt! This may very well be because those involved did not want to draw attention to this building! Such publicity may have caused people to ask about a building so blatantly ignored on that fateful day. And, if they knew, they may have started poking around for answers to the obvious questions! You would also think that rebuilding the first WTC structure would have been a loud statement to the so called terrorists. You would think it would stand out as a symbol of American strength and resolve. And yet the reconstruction of this building went on and was completed with a virtual media blackout and to the surprise of anyone who eventually finds out about it.

It is equally vital to ask these questions: if construction of the new WTC7 was started in 2002 and completed in May of 2006, “when was the replacement building originally planned?” How long does it take to draw up the plans and actually build a 52 story building, especially in the footprint of damage done on 9/11? How long does it take to prepare for this kind of construction from the time you decide to build?

Let me repeat this as I scream as loud as I can: Construction for a 52 story building started less than one year after there was no reason to plan the project! How long does it take to come up with a design, arrange all the legalities, settle the insurance and arrange for the actual construction! Why wasnt the rebuilding of this national historic symbol celebrated? Why didnt FOX News taunt the terrorist with this as a sign of American resolve and as a sign that they did not beat us? Is it possible that this building plan had been initiated prior to the events of 9/11? Is this yet another smoking gun? I think it is!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Apr 27 2008, 01:15 PM
Post #2


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



I didn't know it had been rebuilt until I saw that vid of the WeAreChange folks confronting the security guys there. Frankly, I was stunned.

WTC7 is stuck in the memory hole. They want it to go on down, but it won't. It's like a chicken bone caught in their throat. A furball that is repeatedly coughed up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
richard cranium
post Apr 27 2008, 01:40 PM
Post #3





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 276
Joined: 30-December 06
From: california
Member No.: 390



QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Apr 24 2008, 10:07 PM) *
Just stumbled across this:

http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573

some quotes:

WOW! I never thought of that. The point here is 1,000% correct. Great point! I can't wait to run it by some of my non-believer friends. Thnak you Carl for posting it (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Apr 27 2008, 10:51 PM
Post #4



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,960
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



http://www.wtc7.net/newbuilding7.html

"The same construction company that built the original WTC 7 was contracted to build the new building: Tishman Construction Corporation. Unlike the original WTC 7, which was 100% steel-framed, the replacement has a steel-reinforced concrete core. At 750 feet, the new 50-story tower rises higher than the 570-foot-high 47-story original."

(IMG:http://www.wtc7.net/docs/new/dsc00287.jpg)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Apr 27 2008, 11:15 PM
Post #5



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,960
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



Check out their list of clients.

Wow!
Then I found this jigsaw shaped piece.

"Tishman Research helps develop, for U.S. Gypsum, dry-wall construction method for elevator shafts and stairwells, now an industry standard. The first major use: World Trade Center."

http://www.tishmanconstruction.com/about.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
albertchampion
post Apr 28 2008, 02:19 AM
Post #6





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 1,842
Joined: 1-March 07
Member No.: 710



i could be wrong, but isn't the tishman family one of the pre-eminent zionist entities in the usa?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omega892R09
post Apr 28 2008, 08:29 AM
Post #7





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 2,170
Joined: 29-September 07
From: Hampshire, UK.
Member No.: 2,274



QUOTE (lunk @ Apr 26 2008, 01:15 AM) *
Check out their list of clients.

Wow!

Just so that we have a list here:

QUOTE
Aetna Life Insurance
Alvin Ailey
Amalgamated Life Insurance
Amtrak
Aoki Corporation
Arnold & Porter Attorneys
Atlandia Design & Furnishings, Inc.
Bally Health and Fitness Organization
Bank of America
BDO Seidman
Verizon
BTG, Inc.
Carnegie Hall Corporation
City of Chicago
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Conde Nast, Inc.
Congregation Emanu-El
Continental Airlines, Inc.
Deloitte & Touche
The Durst Organization
EDS
Hilton Hotels Corporation
J. P. Morgan Chase
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.
Massachusetts Port Authority (MASSPORT)
MBNA America
MCI WorldCom
Merrill Lynch & Co.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Morgan Stanley
National Center Foundation
New York City Department of Design and Construction
New York City School Construction Authority
The New York Public Library
Olympus America, Inc.
OMNI Hotels
Planet Hollywood, Inc.
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
PRIMEDIA
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Public Buildings Authority of Puerto Rico
Qwest Communications
Reuters America, Inc.
Rudin Management Company, Inc.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sheraton Corporation
Starwood Hotel
State of California Department of General Services
State of Connecticut
Steelcase Inc.
United States General Services Administration
United States Postal Service
University of Illinois
University of New England
Walt Disney Co.
Westin Hotels and Resorts
William Morris Agency


As for WTC7 re-build and planning time - how many smoking guns are required?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Apr 28 2008, 03:49 PM
Post #8


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



I recommend reading the entire article in the link in the first post, especially the comments. The third one by 'truthman' is classic and hits the nail squarely on the head regarding 9/11. Nicely laced with f-words. It leads to a mention of Warren Buffett's luncheon for WTC execs at Offutt AFB.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Carl Bank
post Apr 28 2008, 06:09 PM
Post #9





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,114
Joined: 21-October 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 121



QUOTE (Oceans Flow @ Apr 29 2008, 06:49 AM) *
I recommend reading the entire article in the link in the first post, especially the comments. The third one by 'truthman' is classic and hits the nail squarely on the head regarding 9/11. Nicely laced with f-words. It leads to a mention of Warren Buffett's luncheon for WTC execs at Offutt AFB.

Hey Bill! Thanks for pointing me to that comment:

QUOTE
# truthman Says:
March 2nd, 2007 at 2:46 am

Jeb Bush had already signed martial law for Florida 2 or 3 days prior. Cheney was in his bunker conducting the war gameswhat a f*cking joke and Rummy had told the press on the 10th that the Pentagon had lost 3 TRILLION dollars. Dubya, of course, was in Florida reading My Pet Goat for a lovely and talented group of 3rd graders.

WTF, mates? It really could not be more obvious, could it? We have a witness to Cheney NOT stopping the attack on DC. (Norman Minetta). We have Dubya NOT moving one iota in Florida at the news of the attacks and the SS doing NOTHING to protect him or the countryNOTHING! And we have the alleged assault on the Pentagon hitting the precise area of the house where the accountants worked that had discovered this 3 trillion missing taxpayer dollars that we add to his didnt hear of that Rummy announced on 9/10/01. WTC 7 housed the offices of the SEC that had been investigating ENRON, WORLDCOM, dozens upon dozens of other malfeseant activitiesGOD, it just goes on and on. And I agreethings did not quite work out for them on 911. WTC WAS to be hit and when flt 93 went afoul (which most probably DID contain ALL of the innocent passengers from ALL the flights that day) they blew the motherfucker in to oblivion.
Once you have awakened it is all too obvious. And the charade did not start yesterday, or ten years ago or one hundred years ago. It started 3000 years ago, dear reader. Humans are the craziest peoplesand also the most trusting. We have been on a three thousand year old journey and are finally on the brink of our awareness of what is. It isnt something that we will ever be too proud of, but it is something that once revealed, will begin the transformation of our species, our race, our planet and our true purpose.

And those who have been the deceivers will have a long, long wait before their ascensionand some will certainly NOT ascendat least for many, many lifetimes.

Changeit is the only constant.

Be the truth and follow your light.


I can't help it, but this way of arguing sounds so familiar to me.
The only one who writes like this about 9/11 is our very own Cary.

Cary? Are you the Truthman? (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif)

Anyway, Cary (or not Cary) followed up with this very intersting
add to his comment:

QUOTE
# truthman Says:
March 2nd, 2007 at 2:59 am

Oh yea, I almost forgotmany of the top executives that worked in the towers had been invited to attend a special party at George Soros house that morning for a 9AM party, Cmon sheepleI mean God f*cking damn! It is NOT right vs. left or Republicans vs. Democrats or Blacks vc. White or Americans vs. Immigrants or Right to Lifers vs. Freedom of Choicersit is us vs. them. And if you cannot figure out which side you belong to, you are officially toast.

The gloves are coming offreal soon.

Peace on you!


Has anyone here ever heared about that Tuesday-Breakfast-Party at
Mr. most-controversial-currency-juggler-ever-Soros' place?


Well, Omega - maybe we have one more to add.

smoking gun collector: Carl
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Apr 28 2008, 06:20 PM
Post #10


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



Read down further where it is clarified that he was thinking of the Buffett party at Offitt AFB.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Carl Bank
post Apr 28 2008, 06:49 PM
Post #11





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 3,114
Joined: 21-October 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 121



QUOTE (Oceans Flow @ Apr 29 2008, 09:20 AM) *
Read down further where it is clarified that he was thinking of the Buffett party at Offitt AFB.



Aahhh...:
QUOTE
# truthman Says:
March 2nd, 2007 at 9:44 am

So sorryIt was Warren Buffet who was having the charity event gathering that many twin tower execs were attending. It was NOT Soros( it was late when I wrote that : -)

And its early now!

Peace on you.


You mentioned Buffet in your post already, Bill.

But due to the facts, that 1) english isn't my first lenguage, and
2) I often read a little hasty to keep up with all infos,
I simply thought "Buffet" is an logistical detail of "Luncheon" and means,
the way of presenting the breakfast at the venue... and I simply explained
away "Warren" with some fancy american nickname-expression for "war monger"
that i don't know... So I translated "Warren Buffet's Luncheon" with something like
"War mongers self-service breakfast" or something in that fashion.


doesn't even know Warren: Carl
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KP50
post Apr 28 2008, 07:18 PM
Post #12



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 826
Joined: 14-May 07
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 1,044



QUOTE (Carl Bank @ Apr 29 2008, 10:49 AM) *
I simply thought "Buffet" is an logistical detail of "Luncheon" and means,
the way of presenting the breakfast at the venue


Warren Buffet = Self-service Rabbit Pie

Thanks for the laugh out loud moment Carl!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
maturin42
post Apr 28 2008, 10:06 PM
Post #13





Group: Core Member
Posts: 605
Joined: 18-February 07
From: Maryland, USA
Member No.: 633



QUOTE (KP50 @ Apr 26 2008, 10:18 PM) *
Warren Buffet = Self-service Rabbit Pie

Thanks for the laugh out loud moment Carl!


Then you add the diversion of AF-1 being "summoned" to Offutt AFB, presumably by Buffett after making Dubya wet his pants with the whole "Angel is next" thing. I'd guess they 'splained things to his shrubness, after which he came back to DC and did as he was told. I suspect the media got on the same page about that time as well, because the inadvertent truth started being revised out of the news accounts as quickly as they possibly could stuff it down the memory hole.

I think the whole Buffett buffet guest list should be subpoenaed to testify as to the discussion at that event, but I ain't holding my breath.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 04:57 PM