Video Of South Tower Being Hit Two Massive Explosions Options

[Paul]

Hi guys found this video interesting, it's a video of the south tower being struck by
flight 175 but what i found interesting is that a second or two after the tower is hit
there are two really loud explosive bangs which sound like actually explosives
going off there is really no delay between the two explosions they occur almost
simultaneously at the same time but my suspicion is the the sounds are faked
i just want to know what you guys think, is there really anyway of telling if they
are or not?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDmP3ZowyDE...feature=related

Are there any witnesses that anyone know of that heard two explosions or
multiple explosions just after the plane struck the south tower?

WTC 9/11 Rare New Impact Footage [NEW VIDEO QUALITY]

The footage is owned by the camera planet archive

Thanks cheers

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif) (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[amazed!]

I don't see or hear anything different on this tape. Because of the distance involved, the sound effects are almost meaningless.

[lunk]

Loud noises tend to echo, especially if there is a large surface nearby.
sound travels through air at about:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound

In dry air at 20 °C (68 °F), the speed of sound is 343 meters per second (1,125 ft/s). This equates to 1,236 kilometers per hour (768 mph), or about one kilometer in three seconds and about one mile in five seconds.

My guess, is the sound of the "second" explosion was the echo off the other tower, as there wasn't a visible second explosion, to explain it.

[Paul]

I would say that if that sound is authentic it would most probably have to be of explosives going off pity it is not
really back up by eyewitness testimony to explosions going off after the plane hit even bush himself admitted
to terrorist operatives being instructed to plant explosives at i high enough point in the towers to prevent the
people above from escaping.

Bush talks about EXPLOSIVES in building (on 9/11?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USnxe7hxP4I

The only question is when he made that statement is how would terrorists gain access and get past security
and plant explosives in the towers without anyone noticing and if they did it who instructed them plant the explosives?

And highly doubt that if foreign operatives from another country did plant explosives in the towers so as to disable the stairwell and prevent the people trapped above from escaping that those operatives where terrorists and where probably
operating under strict instructions from the perpetrators themselves, and where more like hired operatives with demolition and explosives training anyway that's my two cents worth.

[bobcat46]

I would say that if that sound is authentic it would most probably have to be of explosives going off pity it is not
really back up by eyewitness testimony to explosions going off after the plane hit even bush himself admitted
to terrorist operatives being instructed to plant explosives at i high enough point in the towers to prevent the
people above from escaping.

Bush talks about EXPLOSIVES in building (on 9/11?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USnxe7hxP4I

The only question is when he made that statement is how would terrorists gain access and get past security
and plant explosives in the towers without anyone noticing and if they did it who instructed them plant the explosives?

And highly doubt that if foreign operatives from another country did plant explosives in the towers so as to disable the stairwell and prevent the people trapped above from escaping that those operatives where terrorists and where probably
operating under strict instructions from the perpetrators themselves, and where more like hired operatives with demolition and explosives training anyway that's my two cents worth.

Actually, terrorists had access to the buildings for months prior to 9/11.....remember....a member of the Bush Crime Family was running security.......

[lunk]

It could have been a secondary explosion as the plane hit, too.

Hmm, one might almost begin to think, that the towers were built with the intention of dramatically destroying them sometime, conveniently, in the future,
from the get go...
...er, my pet goat?!

[bobcat46]

from the get go...
...er, my pet goat?!

From the look on bushies face, I don't think he knew about the attack in advance, but as he sat there looking like a dufus, it looks like to me he was thinking "well they actually did it, now what the f**k am I going to do and how do I need to act?"

I think by six months later, he knew just who did 9/11 and he knew it wasn't OBL.......just look at what he said only six months later......that he really wasn't concerned about OBL any more, he didn't think about him, OBL wasn't a priority. No......killing innocent people in countries that didn't attack America, sending our brave soldiers to die in foreign countries, stealing from our treasury, trampling on our Constitution, and destroying our economy were more important. No, by early 2002 bushie knew it was not OBL and student pilots that flew those planes into the WTC and whatever crashed into the Pentagon.

And the coverup of a False Flag Attack continues.

[DoYouEverWonder]

Hmm, one might almost begin to think, that the towers were built with the intention of dramatically destroying them sometime, conveniently, in the future

Maybe that's why they didn't bother to weld the curtain walls?

[amazed!]

Lunk

Do you remember that poster Christopher that used to be here? Maybe Christophera, within the last year or 2?

With photographic evidence, and working knowledge of construction and such (which I do not have), he made a fair case that the towers as built did not exactly comply with all of the plans.

Anyway, he theorized that in the concrete as it was poured, were placed charges, and wired together.

All I can say is that it would explain how the concrete was pulverized.

[lunk]

Lunk

Do you remember that poster Christopher that used to be here? Maybe Christophera, within the last year or 2?

With photographic evidence, and working knowledge of construction and such (which I do not have), he made a fair case that the towers as built did not exactly comply with all of the plans.

Anyway, he theorized that in the concrete as it was poured, were placed charges, and wired together.

All I can say is that it would explain how the concrete was pulverized.

i remember,
i tried to stick up for him, i wasn't exactly sure of his theory,
but he sure kept on about it,
to the point of annoying just about everyone here.
One interesting thing he said, was that all the original vcr library recordings had been updated, to an edited version of The Construction of the Twin Towers, on disk. His main claim was that the towers had a concrete core, not a steel core, as popularly believed.

ya, i know, the photo of the sun shining through the towers.
But he did have an explanation.
Reflection, i think...

Thermite is a very stable compound, it can last for years,
and they have used it since the railways.

It could have easily been rigged into the design and construction,
with few people knowing.
Remember, there are some that take a very long term view of things,
like generationally.
Everything built, in a city, will eventually come down.
So, why not design a "demolition strategy" into the commercial buildings in the first place, especially exceptionally, big, buildings, on valuable property.

...but who would ever lease an office in a tower that is pre-wired for demo, by design?

i was quite impressed by the details of his work.

This would mean that 9/11 was planned for, at least 30 years before,
it was carried out.

...and it makes me wonder, if it was planned, even before that.

Airplanes were used as the plausible explanation,
and smoke cover, for the towers' expected disintegration.

[DoYouEverWonder]

Lunk

Do you remember that poster Christopher that used to be here? Maybe Christophera, within the last year or 2?

With photographic evidence, and working knowledge of construction and such (which I do not have), he made a fair case that the towers as built did not exactly comply with all of the plans.

Anyway, he theorized that in the concrete as it was poured, were placed charges, and wired together.

All I can say is that it would explain how the concrete was pulverized.

Sorry, lunk. I do know a lot about the buildings and how they were constructed and there was NO concrete core. The only place they used concrete was the floor slabs. All the evidence shows the Towers had cores made of steel columns. If they had also used concrete, they would have significantly reduced the square footage available for office space, would have significantly increased the cost of construction and would have added tons of unnecessary weight to the buildings.

Yes, the concrete floor slabs were pulverized during the collapses. That doesn't surprise me considering the forces ie explosives at work here. But if you've ever driven down a dirt road in dry weather and see how much dust comes up and how it obscures your ability to see beyond it, even small amounts of concrete would create large amounts of dust that would make it impossible to see anything else.

Besides there was no need to 'wire' the building when they built them and would not have been worth the risk of getting caught for a system that would no longer be reliable 30+ years latter. However, in 1993 the WTC did begin a 10 year project to upgrade all of the wiring in the Towers. That would have been the perfect time to do the dirty.

Since the World Trade Center (WTC) opened its doors in New York City 22 years ago, growing clusters of electronic devices have begun to burden the center's electrical system, which contains some 3,000 miles of electrical conductors and about 100,000 lighting fixtures.

To address the situation, the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, the WTC's owner, has decided to revamp the system with an electrical upgrade that will take an estimated 10 years and $81 million to complete. The project will involve extensive use of copper cabling.

The WTC's electrical system was originally designed to provide tenants with four watts of power per square foot, but today's computers
, facsimile machines, and advanced telephone systems require more power. "We're finding that tenants are now requiring a doubling of capacity to operate some of their highly sophisticated electronic equipment," says Robert DiChiara, WTC assistant director. Capacity will be increased to between eight and 10 watts per square foot.

http://www.allbusiness.com/business-planni...s/394583-1.html

This post has been edited by DoYouEverWonder: Feb 14 2010, 08:58 AM

[lunk]

I think it was a Bin Laden restoration company
that got the contract, for repair
after the 1993 wtc bombing.

(not sure on this, only mention of the restoration after '93,
i can't find the contracted company that did the work)

http://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/bombing93/index.html

[datars]

Here's a site back-in 2003 that I had a link to in my favorites on Windows 2000 Drive. I'm going through it right now looking at stuff I had on 911. The day I discovered the truth was on 4.24.02 with the photo of the Pentagon at an adult site which I was an Admin too.

http://www.thoughtcrimenews.com/wtc.htm

[datars]

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif) Here's some more YouTube

9/11/2001: Both plane crashes with interruptions or faults in footages
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMCETj9gQc8


Unseen 9/11 Footage of Second Plane Hitting Tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iGYVh7HZo8


Strange things in 911 footage - look closely
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3AwEz0K-UI

9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw

This post has been edited by datars: Apr 3 2010, 03:31 PM

[amazed!]

Bin Laden Restoration Company!! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif)

[Omega892R09]

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/laughing1.gif) Here's some more YouTube

Unseen 9/11 Footage of Second Plane Hitting Tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iGYVh7HZo8

I don't know if any noticed the rather odd profile of the nose of that 'aircraft'.

Now I know well the shortening or lengthening effects of shutter mechanisms which operate along the plain of movement when taking shots of fast moving objects, such is clear in a shot from 3 deck up for'ard (from cable deck) that I took of a Phantom F4k leaving the 'angled cat' on Ark Royal with a Minolta SRT101 with a horizontally operating focal plain shutter, but such cannot explain the peculiar profile of that nose. I captured two stills from that clip to show what I mean:

(IMG:http://lionels.orpheusweb.co.uk/Misc/IXXI/ACWTC2_1t.jpg)

(IMG:http://lionels.orpheusweb.co.uk/Misc/IXXI/ACWTC2_2t.jpg)

[Westgate]

I believe the Twin Tower renovations were carried out by the 'Turner Construction Company'.

[7forever]

How would they have time to do that live??

Almost all live footage was zoomed in before impact and zoomed out afterward. This was done because no large plane or likely even a missile struck tower 2. Two live shots exist (that I know of) and both show a ball traveling west to east before impact. At six seconds look at the top right corner and notice the ball. No plane but a ufo moving slowly toward wtc 2.
(IMG:http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcorb2.jpg)
WTC MISSILE STRIKE ON 911: EYE WITNESS SAW "A SMALL PLANE" - YouTube

[DoYouEverWonder]

Almost all live footage was zoomed in before impact and zoomed out afterward. This was done because no large plane or likely even a missile struck tower 2. Two live shots exist (that I know of) and both show a ball traveling west to east before impact. At six seconds look at the top right corner and notice the ball. No plane but a ufo moving slowly toward wtc 2.

All they had to do was prerecord the scene with the plane coming in before the attack, and then overlay the live shot of the buildings burning.

Not much different than the way the do green screen stuff for movies.

[7forever]

2 fake planes 4 seconds before impact

The dive bomb footage was south to north which is (I think) the official flight path. The true flight path was west to east and consistent with the (BALL) ufo being the small plane that many described, including Matt Lauer. A flying saucer circled the tower and bumped into, IMO, the east side of tower 2. The same plane cannot be in different locations at the same time with the nose facing east in one and north in the other. This case is closed in regards to the official story being anything but bullshit.
(IMG:http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtc2.jpg)
(IMG:http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtc1.jpg)
(IMG:http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcorb2.jpg)