Questions: The Passengers, Cell Phone Calls, And Plane Swapping. |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 101 Joined: 18-December 13 Member No.: 7,630 ![]() |
Hi all,
I've recently come across what i think is the best researched and the hardest hitting of the 9/11 documentaries, which includes a number of clips from P4T's vids and which references the material here. Here it is "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor" - Full version (1/3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk In it, towards the end of that segment they discuss the numerous cell phone calls that the public record tried to cover up, unsuccessfully, as you'll see in the video - where they tried to alter the narrative, to say that they were all via air phones, when that was clearly not the case. Since there can be no cell phone coverage, in 2001 and not even now, in 2014 - at the altitudes and aircraft speeds referenced (for contiguous coverage from tower to tower) - then the calls can only have been made, from the ground. In Operation Northwoods the passengers disembarked from the swapped plane at an army base i believe. QUESTION #1) Would there have been adequate time, giving the timing of those calls, which must have been made from the ground at a stationary location - for the original flights to have radar swapped with modified drone aircraft, and then landed, in order for those calls to have been made from passengers aboard the originating flights - or - QUESTION #2) must those passengers have remained grounded the whole time, where the swap took place at the level of the airport tarmac... and could THAT be done and if so, how? You'll note in those calls, that the recipient indicated very clear and crisp reception with no background noise - and the "narrative" offered in the calls themselves seemed contrived and almost acted out. This raises a very horrible image of innocent people reading scripts under duress, or a false pretense -but the last lady at the very end of the video, I tell you when you listen to it, it will give you chills... The way she delivered it... and then at the end when she fumbles with the phone before saying goodbye, her voice cracking in emotion only at the end of her "delivery" - the whisper... oh God. Please help me to understand this element, if the people were "handled" before they even took off, or only after they landed - because those calls could not have been made from altitude at 500mph. That's a fact. Thank you. EageEye |
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 101 Joined: 18-December 13 Member No.: 7,630 ![]() |
Question:
Does anyone know how to obtain the email addresses of all the top 9/11 researchers and writers like David Ray Griffin, Graeme McQueen, etc.? If so, please send them the link to this thread, http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=22548 as well as this one here.. http://www.atsadgrab.com/forum/thread...pg1#pid17369451 which deals with the speed of the south tower plane, proving in no uncertain terms that it cannot have been the original flight 175, which took off and reported in - where it might be helpful to do a voice comparison between the reported captain for that flight and the pilot who reported in post wheels off, that would be worth checking... because of what the overall model is suggesting (herding/handling at the airport facility level), where he's not likely to take off with an empty plane, and yet a flight 175 was needed in the air for the swap, which cannot possibly rely on a successful hijacking with boxcutters.. and the there were no images of hijackers even boarding the aircraft. Those guys couldn't cut their way out of a wet paper bag or flown a baby Cessna, so that's out of the question to begin with. And suggest that they write a new book called maybe something like "9/11 Birds of Prey", dealing with the entire record in regards to the aircraft themselves on the one hand and the cell phone and call record on the other. Such a work would surely peck away at and eat the flesh of Generals as per the book of Revelation with Philip D. Zelikow starring as the false prophet. This post has been edited by EagleEye: Jan 19 2014, 01:47 AM |
|
|
![]() ![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Group: Private Forum Pilot Posts: 162 Joined: 29-February 12 Member No.: 6,710 ![]() |
and yet a flight 175 was needed in the air for the swap No plane on flight UA175 hit WTC2 .... the plane was FAKED ... why should we devote ANY time to cell phones which cannot have ANYTHING to do with whatever Directed Energy Weapon WAS the real device that brought down WTC2 .... and why FGS do we need to place ANY credence on any phony fictactious passenger swaps... There was no plane, therefore there were no passengers |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th December 2019 - 10:22 PM |