Regarding Black Boxes, please need everyones help |
  |
Regarding Black Boxes, please need everyones help |
 Apr 21 2009, 08:55 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 3 Joined: 7-February 09 Member No.: 4,110  |
can anyone tell me why no one talks about the, emergency undercarriage down systems, fitted to most civil aircraft
in any of these pilots for 9/11 truth videos!!!!! and the fact that these videos consentrate on minimal information obtained by the black box which is surely faked!!! as an aircraft engineer i do not think it too be a complete investigation into the infomation contained in these black boxes!!! black boxes record so much infomation about an aircraft and its movements that you would be able to tell if any of these aircarft had there undercarriages on a down and locked selection!!! the pentagon aircraft was so low that the plane as far as i know wouldnt be able too reach that low with out the aircraft selecting the undercariage down in to a locked position!!!! without the pilots imput!!!,just the manover alone of the aircraft would have been enough for the aircraft to do this automatically, if it realy was the plane hitting the pentagon!!!! i would like anyone who has infomation on this to plz feel free to email me as im doing my own reserch into the fact that no one has used this as wepon to prove that 9/11 was an inside job!! simple as! my email is lloydjenkins89@hotmail.com |
 |
 
|
|
Apr 21 2009, 09:14 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 9,266 Joined: 13-August 06 Member No.: 1 |
Welcome to the forum tbb. Glad to see you figured out how to log in. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Your post is a bit hard to understand, but let me try to answer some of your questions if i understand them correctly. 1. The undercarraige does not have to be in the down position for any aircraft to get "so low". Aircraft can land on their belly if the pilot wishes (many times against pilot wishes... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) ) 2. We analyzed the Black Box data due to the fact the NTSB claims it comes from AA77/UA93 and does not support the govt story. Doesnt matter if its fake or not. If its fake, its as alarming as being real as fabricating such information/data is a crime. According to the govt, its real data pulled from the alleged aircraft. Unfortunately, it doesnt support their story. They refuse to comment. Hope this helps... |
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2009, 05:23 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 3 Joined: 7-February 09 Member No.: 4,110 |
QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Apr 22 2009, 02:14 AM)  Welcome to the forum tbb. Glad to see you figured out how to log in. (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Your post is a bit hard to understand, but let me try to answer some of your questions if i understand them correctly. 1. The undercarraige does not have to be in the down position for any aircraft to get "so low". Aircraft can land on their belly if the pilot wishes (many times against pilot wishes... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) ) 2. We analyzed the Black Box data due to the fact the NTSB claims it comes from AA77/UA93 and does not support the govt story. Doesnt matter if its fake or not. If its fake, its as alarming as being real as fabricating such information/data is a crime. According to the govt, its real data pulled from the alleged aircraft. Unfortunately, it doesnt support their story. They refuse to comment. Hope this helps... well i worked on harriers gr7a/ av8b and they have a system where the undercarriage would be selected automatically at hight and speed imput from the peto tubes!!! Im sure that 757 would have a system where by it would be harder than a military jet to overrule the planes desision to exstend its undercarriage legs at the height the pentagon plane was at!! If this plane was even there the planes computer would have thought the plane was coming into land even tho it was travelling too fast the plane would know at what height it was and dropped its undercarriage automatically. im off to work on more military jets soon so will reply and tell you if they have this system which im sure they do!! If anyone who was on the team analyzing this data i have many many questions i would like too ask them but im not wanting too do it over the net!!! i risk losing my job! |
|
|
|
|
Apr 22 2009, 05:28 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 3 Joined: 7-February 09 Member No.: 4,110 |
QUOTE (Turbofan @ Apr 22 2009, 05:51 AM) Welcome to the show! What sort of aircraft do you work on? If you're interested in learning more, send me a PM and I'll give you details on a project I'm researching. Perhaps we can put our heads together. im an MOD TRAINED AIRFRAME AND PROPULTION ENGINEER ive worked on many projects 3 yrs on harriers gr7A / gr7 mainly military fast jets! this is about all i can say on this site without running the risk of getting sacked i want someone who has flown 757 to chat with me an answer the questions i have about the data taken from the black box!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 08:01 PM |
