The Pentagon Flyover full feature presentation now released!, but sadly on google only Options

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Stage6 went out of business so I am looking for a different site to host the divx version but the google version is now released:

http://www.thepentacon.com/PentagonFlyover.htm

Feel free to spread the link anyway you can!
(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif)

[painter]

Cool. Watching now. Looks and sounds great! WHEN CAN I GET A DVD??

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Cool. Watching now. Looks and sounds great! WHEN CAN I GET A DVD??

No plans to release a dvd for now.

[painter]

No plans to release a dvd for now.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/crybaby2.gif)

[rob balsamo]

Excellent job guys... especially uncovering that JEMS report regarding a scheduled departure out of Reagan. Ask Woody if he can get the BTS reports of departures out of Reagan, im sure he already has them.

Also, do you have a link to that JEMS report statement?

Again.. great job... nice editing too Craig.

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Thanks man.

Yeah that was a score.

http://info.jems.com/911/pdf/jems0402.pdf

[Craig Ranke CIT]

I'm pissed though that the google compression knocks the sound a tiny bit off synch.

It's fine in the file.

[rob balsamo]

Front page my friend.. .sending to Media contacts now...

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

[Craig Ranke CIT]

oops better republish it the site is down.

[rob balsamo]

our site or yours? Both seem to be up for me...

[Craig Ranke CIT]

our site or yours? Both seem to be up for me...

It's up now.

That's awesome thanks!
(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/salute.gif)


You added an "s" to Citizen though.

[rob balsamo]

fixed.. i had a few other typos in there as well... (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

[riv]

I do not agree with every single part of this new doc but definitely most of the arguments are very solid. Well done.

[Aldo Marquis CIT]

I do not agree with every single part of this new doc

Well please, by all means, elaborate.

elaborare per cortesia (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
(Did I get that right?)

[riv]

Well please, by all means, elaborate.

elaborare per cortesia :)
(Did I get that right?)

Yep it's right :)

One of these things is the alleged white livery (with the blue stripe, similar to the C32 or whatever is called) of the decoy jet. I've counted 29 eyewitness that reported an American Airlines livery, plus 6 that described a silvery fuselage without mentioning a specific airline. I know just a small part are verified, but I don't see this huge evidence that point to this white livery. Also it's important to note that even if the fuselage is polished, wings, engine and wingmount that constitute more than the half of the visible portion of the aircraft from below are painted white. And this could be the reason why we have a small number of white plane reports.
By the way as I said before the doc is still built on solid arguments (and eyewitnesses) and the interpretation of the white livery reports doens't change the thing too much.

This post has been edited by riv: Feb 27 2008, 06:47 AM

[riv]

Anybody alive?

[Craig Ranke CIT]

Yep it's right (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

One of these things is the alleged white livery (with the blue stripe, similar to the C32 or whatever is called) of the decoy jet. I've counted 29 eyewitness that reported an American Airlines livery, plus 6 that described a silvery fuselage without mentioning a specific airline. I know just a small part are verified, but I don't see this huge evidence that point to this white livery. Also it's important to note that even if the fuselage is polished, wings, engine and wingmount that constitute more than the half of the visible portion of the aircraft from below are painted white. And this could be the reason why we have a small number of white plane reports.
By the way as I said before the doc is still built on solid arguments (and eyewitnesses) and the interpretation of the white livery reports doens't change the thing too much.

Well the white claim isn't all that necessary for the hypothesis.

We assert it because it was so heavily corroborated by random previously unpublished witnesses that we have found on the street.

29 unconfirmed previous published accounts of AA livery aren't that many if you consider when they were interviewed and who the are etc.

Honest people will embellish details innocently. They don't all have to be liars to report it looked like an AA jet since of course many would have already heard this detail from the news before they were interviewed.

So take the people who are innocently embellishing added with the deliberate liars and operatives and I'm sure they could reach 29 rather quickly.

Each random previously unpublished account is worth more than dozens of previously published accounts that we KNOW consists of many liars.

As the white claim became more corroborated from independent witnesses we found on the street it became something we could not deny and had to report.

But bottom line it's not critical and perhaps it was some sort of hybrid livery of some sort to partially look AA and also blend with reports of the E4B.

This post has been edited by Craig Ranke CIT: Feb 27 2008, 08:37 PM

[georgie101]

Great job CIT
Well made, and nicely put together.
Thankyou all for all your hard work.

[riv]

But bottom line it's not critical and perhaps it was some sort of hybrid livery of some sort to partially look AA and also blend with reports of the E4B.

It's not critical indeed.

BTW, did you try to find Captain Joseph Candelario? Seems like he saw something interesting but we need more details.

[riv]

It's not critical indeed.

BTW, did you try to find Captain Joseph Candelario? Seems like he saw something interesting but we need more details.

Another thing, who told Scott P. Cook all the details about the 757 path? And did you have a chance to talk with him?

This post has been edited by riv: Feb 28 2008, 08:28 PM