IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
American 77 Flight Path In 3d, Flight Path Based On Descent/Bank Angles

rob balsamo
post Aug 3 2007, 08:16 AM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1











Download High Resolution Version

(170mb, right click save target as...)


 

American 77 Flight Path version2 - In 3D


08/03/07 - Three Dimensional view of American 77 Flight Path according to data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Removing altitude and NTSB northern plot data as a variable (see http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pressrelease.html for more information), we use the "impact point" as point of origin working outwards based on heading, descent angles and bank angles to analyze if the data can account for the physical damage path. Please see Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two for in depth analysis of complete data provided by US Govt Agencies who claim was generated by the aircraft which struck The Pentagon on September 11, 2001. 





Be sure to rate it here...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=37...142560520&hl=en
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
UnderTow
post Aug 3 2007, 10:43 AM
Post #2





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,421
Joined: 28-August 06
From: Virginia, USA
Member No.: 19



cross posted at LCF and LibertyForum
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cary
post Aug 3 2007, 02:44 PM
Post #3


Ragin Cajun


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,691
Joined: 14-August 06
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Member No.: 5



Damn good stuff Rob. Outstanding. I'll cross post this at a couple of forums today.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LizzyTish
post Aug 3 2007, 02:51 PM
Post #4





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 1,362
Joined: 8-November 06
Member No.: 215



Downloaded it and went and rated it! Now I have to find some time to watch it. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Aug 3 2007, 10:30 PM
Post #5



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,983
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



Beauty.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
maturin42
post Aug 3 2007, 11:34 PM
Post #6





Group: Core Member
Posts: 607
Joined: 18-February 07
From: Maryland, USA
Member No.: 633



Great work, Rob. salute.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
garylc1
post Aug 4 2007, 04:59 AM
Post #7





Group: Newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: 5-April 07
Member No.: 895



I downloaded google sketchup and got discouraged too guick. You did an excellent job. How could anyone not see the inconsistencies in the NTSB report. How do you figure they forged or built a flight data recorder report. Oh well not my line of work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Aug 4 2007, 11:06 AM
Post #8



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,983
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



QUOTE (garylc1 @ Aug 4 2007, 03:59 AM)
How do you figure they forged or built a flight data recorder report.

Good question. I've been wondering the same thing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SwingDangler
post Jan 21 2008, 02:43 PM
Post #9





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 154
Joined: 1-March 07
From: Indiana
Member No.: 711



Do you think CIT's investigation of the White Plane correspond to this line of investigation?

Could the White Plane's black box been substituted for the "hijacked" plane's black box?

Perhaps the CSV file from the white plane was altered to give a southern approach?

Just a couple of my thoughts trying to correspond the need of a white plane with a supposed hijacked plane.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Jan 21 2008, 03:31 PM
Post #10



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



I too have been wondering how long it would take a relatively experienced aircraft technician to "yank" an FDR and/or CVR out of an airplane's tail...

I have found pretty good agreement with the PLA (The Plains, VA) USAF RADES primary radar data and the alleged AA77 FDR TAS & GS velocities however. The GIB (Gibbsboro, NJ) primary and OCA (Oceana, VA) primary and Mode C RADES data and the AA77 FDR Computed Airspeed (CAS) tell considerably different stories though...

Exactly how many "AA77's" were there again?

Of course, a data "hot link" could probably write sequential data from a "specially prepared" laptop in the back of a truck en route to the Pentagon as an FDR's orange paint was being "conditioned."

Wasn't the alleged AA77 FDR "found" under cover of darkness in the smoking Pentagon around 3 A.M. on Wed. 9-12-2001?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Jan 21 2008, 04:00 PM
Post #11



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (dMole @ Jan 21 2008, 02:31 PM)
Wasn't the alleged AA77 FDR "found" under cover of darkness in the smoking Pentagon around 3 A.M. on Wed. 9-12-2001?

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/FDR_location_091607.html


http://pilotsfor911truth.org/location_2.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
morninscott
post Apr 10 2008, 09:34 AM
Post #12





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 8
Joined: 14-January 07
From: bizzaro world
Member No.: 446



Hi everyone,

I've been flying the 767 for the last 8 years and just wanted to fill you in on something I tried on my last sim exercise.
Having a half hour left at the end of our exercise I asked if I could try a high speed Intercept?????????
460+ Kts into a ground structure.......I must say even I was surprised at how difficult the a/c was to handle in ground effect......(considerable force required, up to full down control deflection to maintain level flight with the a/c very easily overcontrolled in all axes)........From 12 miles at 3000' I could not stabilise the a/c in level flight to (strike my target), I had to pull up and give it another go and then only struck the target with a considerable rate of descent in the final stages.
All this CONVINCES me that Hani could NOT fly this 757 as described, laughing1.gif bullshit.gif and any experienced pilot could only achieve this at considerably slower speeds than we saw on Sept 11.
Just my 2 cents worth... and can I say what a great info site this is...KEEP UP THE FIGHT BOYS AND GIRLS!

Cheers!
cheers.gif cheers.gif

This post has been edited by morninscott: Apr 10 2008, 09:36 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
painter
post Apr 10 2008, 11:14 AM
Post #13


∞* M E R C U R I A L *∞


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 5,870
Joined: 25-August 06
From: SFO
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (morninscott @ Apr 10 2008, 06:34 AM) *
. . .
I must say even I was surprised at how difficult the a/c was to handle in ground effect......(considerable force required, up to full down control deflection to maintain level flight with the a/c very easily overcontrolled in all axes)........From 12 miles at 3000' I could not stabilise the a/c in level flight to (strike my target), I had to pull up and give it another go and then only struck the target with a considerable rate of descent in the final stages.
All this CONVINCES me that Hani could NOT fly this 757 as described, . . . and any experienced pilot could only achieve this at considerably slower speeds than we saw on Sept 11.
. . .


Welcome to the forum morninscott! salute.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Truthseekers
post Apr 10 2008, 07:05 PM
Post #14





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 405
Joined: 15-October 06
From: Outside the sheep pen.
Member No.: 66



Simply phenominal!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FacilitateTruth
post Aug 6 2008, 03:11 PM
Post #15





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 3
Joined: 6-August 08
Member No.: 3,754



Rob-
I downloaded the high-quality file twice on two different computers and they both say there are errors in the file. While extracting them, it says there is an extraction error. This was the case on a mac and my PC. Has anyone gotten that to work?
thanks,
FT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th December 2019 - 07:43 AM