IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Even More Reason To Believe That Malaysia Airlines Mh370 Was Demolecularized

paulmichael
post Apr 11 2014, 07:12 PM
Post #21





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 365
Joined: 6-July 12
Member No.: 6,923



QUOTE (paulmichael @ Mar 13 2014, 10:59 AM) *
Why would the-powers-that-be want the search to be characterized as impossible?

They want to blow off the MH370 incident by saying that "It is just one of those things. The plane is lost. Case closed," when, in fact, that MH370 plane was inadvertently demolecularized by some new technology weaponry.

If it were to come out that MH370 was demolecularized into dust (like the WTC on 9/11) then this would open up many questions about 9/11.


In order to continue a cover-up of flight MH370's being demolecularized (or alternatively being zapped into superheated gaseous plasma), is it outside the realm of possibilities that someone dropped a pinger into the deepest part of the Southern Indian Ocean and, in this way, reinforced the [false and possibly fraudulent] "findings" that MH370 flew off to that part of the world and crashed there?

In this way, a fraudster can make it impossible for a submersible to go as deep as the planted pinger, and so it would never be known that there is no black box attached to that pinger and, of course, no associated MH370 debris, but at least the relatives of the casualties of MH370 and the rest of the world, for that matter, would take comfort and security in the [false] belief that MH370 had some sort of plausible ending.

By the way, it was yesterday, I think, on CNN where it was mentioned that if the MH370 777 were to go below 5,000 feet in altitude and continue to cruise over a certain speed, then that 777 would not only be extremely difficult to control but it would also BREAK UP! Why was this type of talk in the mainstream media totally absent regarding the 9/11 flights? Anyway, various CNN experts said that it made no sense whatsoever that the 777 declined rapidly to less than 5,000 feet and then rapidly ascended to a more reasonable cruising altitude. A fighter jet can do that, though, right? I think that much of the so-called "tracking" of MH370 was actually that of the fighter jet that zapped MH370 to smithereens.

I think it bears repeating: solve the mystery of MH370, and you will have solved the mysteries of 9/11 flights AA11, AA77, UA93 and UA175.

P.M.

This post has been edited by paulmichael: Apr 11 2014, 07:14 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th December 2019 - 02:02 AM