War on Terror
Oct 17 2006, 10:50 PM
Oct 20 2006, 03:27 PM
What IS the war on terror? What does that mean? What is it really against?
While anything in the Library could in a sense be placed under this one heading, there's a specific place elsewhere for almost everything.
So, some interesting things may wind up stuck in here, a topic with a title based on a fiction.
Oct 20 2006, 03:27 PM
In U.S., fear and distrust of Muslims runs deep
by Bernd Debusmann
Reuters, Dec 1, 2006
When radio host Jerry Klein suggested that all Muslims in the United States should be identified with a crescent-shape tattoo or a distinctive arm band, the phone lines jammed instantly.http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews....C1-ArticlePage3
The first caller to the station in Washington said that Klein must be "off his rocker." The second congratulated him and added: "Not only do you tattoo them in the middle of their forehead but you ship them out of this country ... Another said that tattoos, armbands... [etc.] did not go far enough. "What good is identifying them?" ... "You have to set up encampments like during World War Two..."
LIES and Deception - Al-Qaeda and Terrorists
dizzying collection of articles and links dealing with deceptions surrounding the US War on Terror
President Bush's National Security Strategy Reaffirms Pre-Emptive Use of Military Force
by Deb Riechmann
ABC News, Mar 16 2006
This is not from 2002, when the US released it's National Security Strategy, proclaiming its right to use pre-emptive force. This is Bush re-afirming it 2006 - If you can believe it.
Security Strategy: Comedy or Tragedy?
by Jeff Huber
Pen & Sword, Mar 22 2006
No, it's not a remake of the film Doctor Strangelove. It's the real foreign policy and security strategy really being conducted in real-time by the real United States of America in the real world...http://zenhuber.blogspot.com/2006/03/secur...or-tragedy.html
Bush pledges 'terror war' victory
BBC, 31 August 2006
Report on 2006 Bush speech - this is the basis of present American foreign policy
Intel: Iraq War Increased Terror Threat
Drudge Report, September 24 2006
Oct 20 2006, 03:27 PM
Posts and Threads
The 100 Year War
Re: 'US general issues warning: politics must not interfere with 100-year “war on terror”'
Article by Bill Van Auken
19 December 2006
QUOTE ( from the article)
One of the Pentagon’s senior uniformed strategists warned last week that the “global war on terror” will go on for another 50 to 100 years and voiced concern that “politics” not be allowed to interfere with the protracted struggle.Thread started by Oceans Flow
Thread started by The DECIDER
i used to love 24, this season is all about brutal terrorists, and terrorists getting caught, terrorists trying to blow up cities,...http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum...showtopic=4713
... I dont know if this means anything, but Keafer's father [D.Sutherland] is a member of bilderberg
Crypto-gram, 15th March Issue
Just an interesting read
thread started by Drakey
(symptoms of a world gone nutz)
Oct 20 2006, 03:27 PM
Breaking The Silence
Truth and Lies in the War on Terror
by award-winning journalist John Pilger
excellent documentary - thanks to datars for uploading this high quality version onto google
One of Alex Jones' best works to date
The Great Conspiracy
"The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw"
From Barrie Zwicker
The Power of Nightmares
"Great documentary about the illusion of terror and politics"
The Usual Suspects
Clips of bin Laden speaking, excerpts from the confession tape, and some of the alleged hijackers speaking.
*Note from librarian; I don't know who put this together, obviously the Pentagon image behind the al-Qaeda member etc. was added by someone - but this is an oft mentioned video so I chose to include it (four parts).
The National Security Strategy
of the United States of America
George W. Bush
THE WHITE HOUSE,
September 17, 2002
(followed by text of a number of post-9/11 speeches by President Bush that spell out the Nation's new foreign policy, including Bush's address at the National Cathedral)
Elements of a National Policy
By Ashton B. Carter, John M. Deutch and Philip D. Zelikow
A Report of Visions of Governance for the Twenty-First Century
A Project of the John F. Kennedy School of Government
©1998 by the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University and the Board of Trustees of Harvard University
QUOTE (about a quarter of the way down...)
Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy is lack of imagination. An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible. Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a "before" and "after."
QUOTE (about a third of the way down...)
On the other hand, domestic law enforcement has many techniques for gathering data, including lawful wiretaps and grand jury investigations. Much of the yield from these efforts is, in turn, closed off to the national security community by law or regulation, to safeguard constitutional rights.8This was written in 1998. Co-author Philip D. Zelikow is a Washington insider who served as co-chairman on the 9/11 commission.
We believe the U.S. needs a new institution to gather intelligence on terrorism, with particular attention to the threat of catastrophic terrorism. We call this new institution a National Terrorism Intelligence Center. This Center would be responsible for collection management, analysis, dissemination of information, and warning of suspected catastrophic terrorist acts. The Center would need the statutory authority to:
· monitor and provide warning of terrorist threats to relevant agencies of the U.S. government, supporting defense or intelligence operations, as well as law enforcement;
· set integrated collection requirements for gathering information for all the intelligence agencies or bureaus of the U.S. government;
· receive and store all lawfully collected, relevant information from any government agency, including law enforcement wiretaps and grand jury information;
· analyze all forms of relevant information to produce integrated reports that could be disseminated to any agency that needed them, while restricting dissemination of underlying domestic wiretap and grand jury information;
· review planned collection and intelligence programs of all agencies directed toward terrorist targets to determine the adequacy and balance among these efforts in preparation of the President’s proposed budget;
· facilitate international cooperation in counterterrorism intelligence, including the bilateral efforts of individual agencies;
· not manage operational activities or take on the task of general intelligence about the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (now coordinated in the Director of Central Intelligence Nonproliferation Center);
· be exempt from motions for pretrial discovery in the trials of indicted criminals.
|Lo-Fi Version||Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 09:14 PM|