IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

Do The Mini-nukes In The Underground Still Exist ?

Saheike
post Sep 21 2014, 04:30 AM
Post #1





Group: Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: 20-January 13
Member No.: 7,186



Hi,
it was told, that under every skyscraper must be placed a mini-nuke to bring it down in case of demolitian plans.
My question is if the Towers went down by airplanes and jet fuel are those nukes still in the underground and intact ? So they can be used for a new desastre in the middle of Manhattan in the future or are they gone ?

Would be nice if someone can answer those questions.


This post has been edited by Saheike: Sep 21 2014, 04:31 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
amazed!
post Sep 21 2014, 09:13 AM
Post #2





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (Saheike @ Sep 21 2014, 04:30 AM) *
Hi,
it was told, that under every skyscraper must be placed a mini-nuke to bring it down in case of demolitian plans.
My question is if the Towers went down by airplanes and jet fuel are those nukes still in the underground and intact ? So they can be used for a new desastre in the middle of Manhattan in the future or are they gone ?

Would be nice if someone can answer those questions.


Nuclear devices, along with nano-thermite, were used to bring down the towers. The evidence is ample.

Jeff Prager has an ebook online which is excellent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kozer1
post Sep 21 2014, 09:53 AM
Post #3





Group: Core Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 2-March 14
Member No.: 7,724



QUOTE (amazed! @ Sep 21 2014, 08:13 AM) *
Nuclear devices, along with nano-thermite, were used to bring down the towers. The evidence is ample.

Jeff Prager has an ebook online which is excellent.


That's why they named it "Ground Zero". Then, they changed the definition of GROUND ZERO in dictionary and encyclopedia printings since 2002. Dimitri Khalezov- WTC Nuclear Demolition, is the fascinating Youtube video featuring ex officer of Soviet Nuclear Intelligence who explains the process and evidence. I wonder myself about the Sears Tower in Chicago...? Is it "armed" as well? D. Kozeruba
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NP1Mike
post Sep 21 2014, 06:19 PM
Post #4





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 422
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



QUOTE (Kozer1 @ Sep 21 2014, 08:53 AM) *
Dimitri Khalezov- WTC Nuclear Demolition, is the fascinating Youtube video featuring ex officer of Soviet Nuclear Intelligence who explains the process and evidence.


Dimitri certainly is a charming man.

I agree that mini-nukes were most likely used on 9/11, however Dimitri's explanation as to where the nukes were planted and how they brought down the towers doesn't work for me.

His theory is that they were installed underground, underneath the towers, decades in advance of 9/11.

I ask you a simple question.
When you watch the floors explode one by one, from top to bottom, does it look like a nuclear bomb exploding underneath the building?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Jan 24 2015, 11:54 AM
Post #5





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Sep 21 2014, 06:19 PM) *
Dimitri certainly is a charming man.

I agree that mini-nukes were most likely used on 9/11, however Dimitri's explanation as to where the nukes were planted and how they brought down the towers doesn't work for me.

His theory is that they were installed underground, underneath the towers, decades in advance of 9/11.

I ask you a simple question.
When you watch the floors explode one by one, from top to bottom, does it look like a nuclear bomb exploding underneath the building?


The US has been conducting nuclear R&D since before 1945. My guess is that the technology for nuclear weapons has been refined at least as much as the technology for turbine engines and satellite navigation.

Point is, when assessing what we saw and measured at WTC, one must not be trapped into thinking that only 1945 technology was employed in 2001.

If one considers the epidemiology involved with those working at Ground Zero, the employment of that term by government and the mainstream media, the last picture from the Hudson shown on this thread, the testimony of Willy Rodriguez regarding a massive explosion in the basements BEFORE the airplane struck, then YES, it does look like nuclear devices were employed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NP1Mike
post Jan 25 2015, 05:48 PM
Post #6





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 422
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



QUOTE (amazed! @ Jan 24 2015, 10:54 AM) *
...Point is, when assessing what we saw and measured at WTC, one must not be trapped into thinking that only 1945 technology was employed in 2001.

If one considers the epidemiology involved with those working at Ground Zero, the employment of that term by government and the mainstream media, the last picture from the Hudson shown on this thread, the testimony of Willy Rodriguez regarding a massive explosion in the basements BEFORE the airplane struck, then YES, it does look like nuclear devices were employed.


I agree that technology does not stand still. Advances are made almost on a daily basis.

What I have a hard time believing, is that devices were planted decades before 9/11 and used on 9/11 to bring down the buildings.

Would you take a chance on the reliability of explosive devices (any part of it, the triggers, the bombs, etc.) that were decades old, in one of the greatest false flag events in history?


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Jan 30 2015, 09:35 AM
Post #7





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,017
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jan 25 2015, 05:48 PM) *
I agree that technology does not stand still. Advances are made almost on a daily basis.

What I have a hard time believing, is that devices were planted decades before 9/11 and used on 9/11 to bring down the buildings.

Would you take a chance on the reliability of explosive devices (any part of it, the triggers, the bombs, etc.) that were decades old, in one of the greatest false flag events in history?


Most likely the devices/charges and thermite were placed in the months before, probably since Silverstein acquired the property.

There were all sorts of "construction projects" going on there, by I think Ace or Acme elevator company. Also, we know that tenants were advised that on the weekend before, the towers would be powered down, and then powered back up.

It was an inside job, and it was prepared for months.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NP1Mike
post Jan 30 2015, 04:20 PM
Post #8





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 422
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



QUOTE (amazed! @ Jan 30 2015, 08:35 AM) *
Most likely the devices/charges and thermite were placed in the months before, probably since Silverstein acquired the property.

There were all sorts of "construction projects" going on there, by I think Ace or Acme elevator company. Also, we know that tenants were advised that on the weekend before, the towers would be powered down, and then powered back up.

It was an inside job, and it was prepared for months.



I agree on all the points above.

I just can't buy the nukes prepared decades before AND subsequently used on 9/11 theory.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Saheike   Do The Mini-nukes In The Underground Still Exist ?   Sep 21 2014, 04:30 AM
- - amazed!   QUOTE (Saheike @ Sep 21 2014, 04:30 AM) H...   Sep 21 2014, 09:13 AM
|- - Kozer1   QUOTE (amazed! @ Sep 21 2014, 08:13 A...   Sep 21 2014, 09:53 AM
|- - NP1Mike   QUOTE (Kozer1 @ Sep 21 2014, 08:53 AM) Di...   Sep 21 2014, 06:19 PM
|- - rorymcfizz   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Sep 21 2014, 10:19 PM) D...   Jan 20 2015, 07:56 AM
||- - rorymcfizz   well i have wached every video and read most books...   Jan 20 2015, 08:15 AM
|- - amazed!   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Sep 21 2014, 06:19 PM) D...   Jan 24 2015, 11:54 AM
|- - NP1Mike   QUOTE (amazed! @ Jan 24 2015, 10:54 A...   Jan 25 2015, 05:48 PM
|- - amazed!   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jan 25 2015, 05:48 PM) I...   Jan 30 2015, 09:35 AM
|- - NP1Mike   QUOTE (amazed! @ Jan 30 2015, 08:35 A...   Jan 30 2015, 04:20 PM
|- - amazed!   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jan 30 2015, 04:20 PM) I...   Feb 7 2015, 09:22 AM
|- - NP1Mike   QUOTE (amazed! @ Feb 7 2015, 08:22 AM...   Feb 7 2015, 02:37 PM
|- - amazed!   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Feb 7 2015, 02:37 PM) It...   Feb 16 2015, 11:34 AM
- - Pablo   THE TWINS & #7: THE LOWEST-TECH (POSSIBLE) DES...   Sep 21 2014, 11:46 AM
|- - NP1Mike   QUOTE (Pablo @ Sep 21 2014, 10:46 AM) My ...   Sep 21 2014, 05:48 PM
- - hanky   Of course it is true!! And everyone, at b...   Sep 21 2014, 03:26 PM
- - Truthissweet   QUOTE 1) The Twins were: "hollow", ...   Jan 22 2015, 12:08 PM
- - Truthissweet   QUOTE (Saheike @ Sep 21 2014, 03:30 AM) H...   Jan 22 2015, 01:52 PM
- - Truthissweet   This is from boat on the Hudson. Not sure if this ...   Jan 23 2015, 04:01 PM
- - SKYDRIFTER   QUOTE (Saheike @ Sep 21 2014, 08:30 AM) H...   Mar 7 2015, 10:10 PM
- - amazed!   SKYDRIFTER There was signs, many signs, of a nucl...   Mar 8 2015, 09:22 AM
- - Truthissweet   QUOTE (amazed! @ Mar 8 2015, 08:22 AM...   Mar 9 2015, 09:42 AM
- - amazed!   QUOTE (Truthissweet @ Mar 9 2015, 09:42 A...   Mar 13 2015, 10:07 AM
- - Truthissweet   QUOTE (amazed! @ Mar 13 2015, 09:07 A...   Mar 14 2015, 10:44 AM
- - amazed!   QUOTE (Truthissweet @ Mar 14 2015, 10:44 ...   Mar 16 2015, 10:22 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th September 2019 - 04:46 PM