IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Target On New York

katsung47
post Sep 11 2013, 02:50 PM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 92
Joined: 26-March 13
Member No.: 7,299



762. Target on New York (3/9/2013)

The main target city of a "terror attack" is New York.

QUOTE
Bin Laden son-in-law arrested, whisked to NYC on terror charges

Officials tell NBC News he had been a prisoner in Iran for most of the past decade and is scheduled to appear in federal court Friday. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

By Jonathan Dienst, Pete Williams and Andrea Mitchell, NBC News

Osama bin Laden's son-in-law, who acted as a spokesman for al-Qaida, has been apprehended, transported to New York and charged with conspiracy to kill Americans, according to court documents unsealed Thursday.

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03...or-charges?lite


Al Qaida is a secret asset of US. It works for US strategy interest. Bin Laden worked as a living plant. The country where he went, was claimed “evil axis” by US. Under such excuse, Bush activated war in Mid-east. Abu Ghaith- Bin Laden’s son in law – has the same mission. He was arranged to smuggle to Iran in 2002 at the purpose to frame Iran a “terrorist” country. Iran might have known the trick and put Bin Laden’s “refugee relatives” into prison.

Now when the Feds planed another “terror attack” on US, they need a complete story – a big head of terrorist is on trial in New York. Al Qaida revenges the trial with a nuke attack. Since the frame case was original projected in March – we saw just in days, Abu Ghaith was arrested and sent to New York. What a rush.
New York has been the target in Feds’ blacklist for a long time under the same project. The terror attack was designed to trigger war on Iran that would be used to distract a framed case. An identical one was the attempt to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in New York. From the news you could see the master mind was the D.O.J. Chief Eric Holder.

QUOTE
Accused 9/11 Mastermind to Face Civilian Trial in N.Y.

By CHARLIE SAVAGE November 13, 2009

The decision, announced by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., could mean one of the highest-profile and highest-security terrorism trials in history would be set just blocks from where hijackers for Al Qaeda destroyed the World Trade Center, killing nearly 2,750 people.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/us/14ter...ed=all&_r=0


QUOTE
The Trial

Eric Holder and the battle over Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

by Jane Mayer February 15, 2010

On December 5th, several hundred people gathered in Foley Square, in lower Manhattan, and withstood a drenching rainstorm for two hours in order to send a message to Attorney General Eric Holder. A JumboTron, set up by the protesters, played clips of Holder’s recent testimony before Congress, in which he explained his decision to hold the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed—the self-proclaimed planner of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001—and four co-conspirators in the colonnaded federal courthouse flanking the square, rather than in a military commission at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Members of the crowd shouted at the

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/02...r#ixzz2N4yqhX1F


New Yorkers might have been aware of the plot planted on them. They fiercely opposed it and successfully rejected that trial. Eric Holder knows it. He still puts another one on them in a raid.

763. Why select New York? (3/18/2013)

Several years after 911 attack, people were rattled by unusual cancer case among first responders of ground zero. They started to think the WTC were pulled down by mini nukes.

QUOTE
"35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC
Thursday, July 02, 2009

1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
.....

http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/...ukes.html"


QUOTE


Then cancer caused death rapidly rose. 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.

QUOTE
"9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale”

April 4, 2011 By Daily Mail Reporter

A seven-year study by the New York Fire Department has claimed that there are ‘unusual rises’ in the number of cancer cases among firefighters who worked in the aftermath of 9/11.

Dr. David Prezant, the Fire Department’s chief medical officer, has reportedly said that cancer cases across ‘all ranks’ of the FDNY who worked at Ground Zero are ‘up significantly’.

It is thought that the report – due to be officially disclosed in time for the 10th anniversary of the terror attacks in September – cites unusual rises in leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

‘It’s a fact that New York City firefighters are dying of cancer in record numbers.

‘We have buried 10 firefighters in just the last 15 weeks, seven with cancer. On Sept. 10, 2001, they were young, healthy firefighters.’

The New York state Health Department has confirmed that 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/04/04/91...he-scale/"


Now you should understand why Eric Holder announced to put "911 mastermind K.S.Mohammed " on trial in New York" in 2009. It was used to justify an "Al Qaida revenge attack for trial of their leader". The planned attack was a nuclear one, so they could blame the cancer were caused by Al Qaida terror attack. The purpose is to cover up the truth that in 911 attack, mini nukes were used. The similar tactic has been tried in 2007, when a B-52 flied over US continental with 6 loaded nuke missiles. New York must have been the target of these nuclear missiles. Of course, mainstream media beat the drum on “911 Master-mind trial” but rarely report the unusual cancer deaths of the first responders of ground zero. Because that would expose who was the real Master-mind of 911 – Al Qaida has no nuclear bomb.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
katsung47
post Jan 12 2014, 08:17 PM
Post #2





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 92
Joined: 26-March 13
Member No.: 7,299



MSM Accidentally Airs Incriminating 9/11 Evidence: Molten Waterfall

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USu4ENwjaqk...ayer_detailpage

http://youtu.be/USu4ENwjaqk
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
katsung47
post Mar 6 2014, 06:32 PM
Post #3





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 92
Joined: 26-March 13
Member No.: 7,299



Quote, "use of micro-nukes to takedown the WTC complex — 9/11 through different eyes
NEW YORK CITY (INTELLIHUB)

The use of micro-nukes in the WTC complex on 9/11–the smoking gun

Dr. Ed Ward has documented what he believes is the use of micro-nukes on the World Trade Center complex attack that took place in September of 2001.

One of the smoking guns in this case is that over 5.3 billion pounds of steel was instantly turned into 2 billion pounds of dust, but that’s not all.

Massive steel beams were bent like pretzels as the towers collapsed.

One video shows the penthouse on building 7 being demolished on the roof just before the building comes down. This proves that a top-down demolition process was being utilized, otherwise the buildings might have just twisted, naturally falling over themselves. But perhaps the most startling revelation is the fact that vehicles looked incinerated up to one mile away from the towers. Cars were even flipped over as if they came out of a war zone.

The fact that many of the first responders are now dead if not very sick does not sound like the byproduct of a falling building but more like they got a massive dose of deadly radiation. Most of the responders have died of blood cancer, yet another sign of radiation exposure.

Cars not hit by falling debris yet totally destroyed far away from the towers

Molten metal was seen in and around the debris of the WTC for months.
There is also the fact that the debris field was substantially low for the magnitude of buildings that were destroyed, thus signifying that most of the debris was incinerated upon the demo blast.

Massive craters under the WTC complex were formed, likely from the detonation of micro-nukes, as the rock was even melted smooth. Later after the site was fairly cleaned up and the craters were excavated, the city of New York continued to wash down the cavities with hoses daily for years as traces of Tritium were found, signifying the use of nuclear weaponry. Evidence shows that levels of Tritium were 55 times higher than normal in the WTC debris. Tritium is a by-product of a nuclear blast…..

http://intellihub.com/use-micro-nukes-take...different-eyes/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
katsung47
post Jul 4 2014, 12:25 PM
Post #4





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 92
Joined: 26-March 13
Member No.: 7,299



“Nuke cancer” from 9/11 revealed
By Gordon Duff and Press TV

A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a “nuclear event,” but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York, radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem cell therapy and physically devastating “chemo.”

One of the biggest medical cover-ups in history was exposed this week when Wall Street brokers suffering from cancer after 9/11 made the news. While telling their story, the New York Post revealed that 70,000 New Yorkers have applied for 9/11 victim compensation, most for cancers that can only be attributed to direct exposure to ionizing radiation from nuclear weapons.

Of the 70,000 victims, over 90% say they were exposed within a one-square-mile area. Yet the cover-up has been so thorough that only one death has been “officially reported” and only a small number of victims have been paid compensation due to a “system” ripe with denial, disinformation and corruption.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/nu...m-911-revealed/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kawika
post Jul 6 2014, 10:33 AM
Post #5





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 477
Joined: 16-August 07
From: Upstate NY/VT border
Member No.: 1,719



Katsung wrote:

1. "One of the smoking guns in this case is that over 5.3 billion pounds of steel was instantly turned into 2 billion pounds of dust..."

1. FALSE: This is the Judy Wood "steel was dustified" fantasy. The steel was actually removed and recycled. What were all those cranes, loaders and flatbeds doing at Ground Zero? What were all those cutting torches doing?
EXHIBIT #1-- http://www.foxnews.com/story/2002/02/23/re...l-with-respect/

Amy C. Sims, "Recycling Trade Center Steel With Respect," Fox News, February 23, 2002:

"The Port Authority estimates more than 200,000 tons of steel was used in the World Trade Center's construction. Of that total, more than 168,000 tons has been salvaged from Ground Zero thus far, according to the New York City Office of Emergency Management.

"Three companies – Metal Management Northeast of Newark, N.J., Hugo Neu Schnitzer East of Jersey City and Blandford Land Development Corporation of Brooklyn, N.Y. – have successfully bid for city contracts to recycle the steel, and continue to bid on what remains to be salvaged."

EXHIBIT #2-- The FEMA 403 Report, Appendix D, page 1, says that "more than 350,000 tons" were recycled by MAY 2002.

EXHIBIT #3-- There are many photos and videos of the mountains of steel in the scrap yards still waiting to be recycled in APRIL 2002.



2. "One video shows the penthouse on building 7 being demolished on the roof just before the building comes down. This proves that a top-down demolition process was being utilized..."

2. FALSE: The penthouse was taken down into the building, does not descend any further than the 47th floor. You can see light there only, from the massive hole made in the roof. If it did go further as NIST claims, the exterior would show significant deformations, window breakage and granite panels popping off. You would also see concrete debris ejecting from the east side. You see none of that.

The WTC7 demo started at the bottom, after the PH was inhaled. The whole facade moves as a unit. It was not a top down demo.


3. "perhaps the most startling revelation is the fact that vehicles looked incinerated up to one mile away from the towers."

3. FALSE: This is another Judy Wood fantasy. The cars on FDR Drive were taken there with forklifts and dropped. In some of the photos you can see the knobby tire tracks 90 degrees to the sides of the cars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
katsung47
post Jul 14 2014, 06:25 PM
Post #6





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 92
Joined: 26-March 13
Member No.: 7,299



QUOTE (kawika @ Jul 6 2014, 10:33 AM) *
Katsung wrote:


2. "One video shows the penthouse on building 7 being demolished on the roof just before the building comes down. This proves that a top-down demolition process was being utilized..."

2. FALSE: The penthouse was taken down into the building, does not descend any further than the 47th floor. You can see light there only, from the massive hole made in the roof. If it did go further as NIST claims, the exterior would show significant deformations, window breakage and granite panels popping off. You would also see concrete debris ejecting from the east side. You see none of that.

The WTC7 demo started at the bottom, after the PH was inhaled. The whole facade moves as a unit. It was not a top down demo.


Read this please.

QUOTE
WTC 7 Now A Proven Case Of Controlled Demolition

June 3, 2014|

Controlled Demolition of WTC 7 Now Proven

Guest Posting by 9/11 Consensus Panel

Professor Daniele Ganser’s guest article on false flag attacks and his lecture on 9/11 will rescue you from the web of official lies spun by the government and presstitute media.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/06/01...iversity-basel/

The latest research establishes that World Trade Center Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition. The press release below will suffice to inform you of the latest developments.

PRESS RELEASE: World Trade Center Building 7’s Controlled Demolition: 9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings

June 1, 2014 –The 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel – which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers – today announced three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7.
Source: The 9/11 Consensus Panel @911consensus consensus911@gmail.com

Contact List: http://www.consensus911.org/media-contacts/

Co-founders: David Ray Griffin, Elizabeth Woodworth
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/06/03...led-demolition/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th November 2019 - 03:01 AM