IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

R. I. P. - No Plane Theory, Jim Fetzer evading questions

onesliceshort
post May 2 2012, 10:56 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



I'm just going to jump straight in here. Basically Jim Fetzer has been evading these points I raised at "TruthandShadows" blogspot (820 posts later..)

Post 1.


From Simon Shack’s FAQ section:

QUOTE
The skeptics argue that “too many videos of the airplane were captured, therefore all cannot be fake …” Too many indeed: there are a simply ludicrous amount of “lucky” shots. In fact, the sheer amount of existing ‘airplane’ images is grossly absurd in itself: We now have more than 45 “amateur videos” (some of which were released – inexplicably – as late as June 2008!). We also have at least 10 still pictures depicting alleged “Flight 175” “in its very last second of flight” 


First off, the "lucky shots" description is ludicrous because thousands of New Yorkers were focused on this area after the strike on Tower 1.

According to the NPT accusations, that’s 55 people who allegedly, knowingly allowed their names to be publically used as authors of totally manipulated footage, or altered the footage themselves. 55 people, alleged “sleepers”, who “know” exactly what happened on 9/11 in Manhattan. That the towers were blown up by internal explosives and that a hologram was used to fool on the ground witnesses. 

That’s a lot of loose ends.





Please also check the above collection of still images for debris falling from the impact side of the facade.

I agree that certain footage has been edited, withheld, censored or have had their resolution purposely lessened. The Naudet second tower impact has clearly been edited, one Citgo camera was physically removed, the "gatecam" footage which was capable of reading registrations on vehicles has been purposely reuploaded (at least twice) to make the footage useless etc. 

But to insinuate that an actual army of ops actually added an aircraft to footage caught? And adding them perfectly to match the flightpath?



So how can people who allege that all footage is a complete fabrication and that it's been in the perps'  hands literally from day one, base any scientific claims on observations made in them??

Even the claim that no aircraft debris was seen falling from the impact side doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Pause and play the impact seen in the following video. Slowmo if you can.



Then there's this:



I don't know if there is any footage of the base of that area, but the collapse of the tower also leaves the debris claim open to obfuscation.

We have to remember that this aircraft was allegedly travelling at over 700 feet per second. Over 4 times its own length travelled in one second as it impacted the facade.

The length of the fuselage from the nose to the wings is 60ft. The aircraft's recorded speed would cover that 60ft distance in less than a tenth of a second.

When the 60ft of fuselage appears to penetrate the facade, this could be down to optical illusion. The event was over in one tenth of a second.

Here's a video that's as close as I could find to the collision of a hard steel object (steel sled) against a bulky object such as the fuselage. A car.

Normal speed



Slow motion (pay attention to the actual collision at the beginning of the video)



See how the car appears to "melt" or "disappear"? The actual interaction was over in a fraction of a second.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
onesliceshort
post May 7 2012, 09:02 AM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



QUOTE ™
My worry is this: By declaring NPT for "dead", for whatever reason, this could be seen as if P4T are capitulating to the 'detractors' and 'professional disinformants' and thereby playing into their hands, as these people have probably been aiming for exactly this outcome, this 'death', from the very start.


You're way off base TM. This has nothing to do with "capitulating" to anybody. It was in response to Jim Fetzer trying to redefine what NPT actually is ("NPT doesn't mean that there were no planes"...come on) and trying to wrap it up in credible documented and proven research by CIT and Rob.

You know yourself that anything I posted on the subject over at TAS wasn't a kneejerk reaction but an attempt by myself to see why good people like yourself defended it. To see if there was any basis for the claims. The reasons are listed above mate. There's no truth in it that I can see.

You should be asking Jim Fetzer and Dennis Cimino why they created this little soap opera. Fetzer had his responses ready to copy and paste both here and at TAS because he knew what the reaction would be. He has painted anybody who doesn't agree with his warped wordplay as possible disinformationists (at VT - a site that allowed a clear disinfo "Pentagon missile" video be posted even though it was repeatedly proven that it was a hoax)

Even Senor El Once, a long time NPT advocate, has admitted publically at TAS that NPT is wrong based on the above posts.

If there's any counterargument I'd like to hear it.

Did you read the post on the "hologram technology" that you cited to me?

This post has been edited by onesliceshort: May 7 2012, 09:03 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tamborine man
post May 7 2012, 11:11 PM
Post #3





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 951
Joined: 1-July 07
From: Australia
Member No.: 1,315



QUOTE (onesliceshort @ May 5 2012, 12:02 PM) *
You're way off base TM. This has nothing to do with "capitulating" to anybody. It was in response to Jim Fetzer trying to redefine what NPT actually is ("NPT doesn't mean that there were no planes"...come on) and trying to wrap it up in credible documented and proven research by CIT and Rob.



Now you're completely confusing me, OSS!
Now it looks like we're completely talking past each other!

I have always been under the impression that "the no plane theory" first really started with the 'birth' of the 'Pentacon forum'
back in 2007. This 'countermeasure' as a result of the vicious attacks that then took place trying to discredit CIT.
Do you remember the slogan, "Hunt for the Boeing757"? Do you remember Swing Danglers 17 points, that conclusively proves
that no Boeing could have entered the pentagon, and therefore gave incredible support and much stronger backbone to the
"no plane theory"?

It is solely from this 'starting point' that i'm personally and independently defending NPT, and for no other reason.


QUOTE
You know yourself that anything I posted on the subject over at TAS wasn't a kneejerk reaction but an attempt by myself to see why good people like yourself defended it. To see if there was any basis for the claims. The reasons are listed above mate. There's no truth in it that I can see.


Yes i now gather that when you talk about NPT, then you're limiting the debate to exclusively center around WCT and nothing
else!
I cannot recall any time where you or Rob have been spelling out this "separation of terms" in a clear language, so that could
very well be where all the misunderstandings and confusions arise from!
Though i do grant you, that from yours and Rob's point of view it needn't have been done, as it should all have been "implied"
or "understood", but i'm sorry to say that on this occasion, i didn't get it.

So for the sake of absolute clarity can we now come to an agreement, that when you speak of NPT as being 'dead', then you're
only and exclusively referring to that as being the case solely with regards to WCT?

Can we also come to an agreement that the term, "NPT is dead", does not, and cannot, apply to the pentagon and to Shanksville?


QUOTE
You should be asking Jim Fetzer and Dennis Cimino why they created this little soap opera. Fetzer had his responses ready to copy and paste both here and at TAS because he knew what the reaction would be. He has painted anybody who doesn't agree with his warped wordplay as possible disinformationists (at VT - a site that allowed a clear disinfo "Pentagon missile" video be posted even though it was repeatedly proven that it was a hoax)


I only speak for myself. You should know this by now, OSS!


QUOTE
Did you read the post on the "hologram technology" that you cited to me?



Yes, and was going to reply earlier, but didn't find the time the last 3 - 4 days!

I noticed that you didn't mention my quote from DARPA's budget papers once! Will you tell me why?

Instead you quoted a lot from the "3D-holographic Display" paper. This link i included for no other reasons
than to show that even back in 1998 great research was conducted by others re. 'hologram projections'.

For me, the only important part is the one i quoted from DARPA's paper. It is in that especially, where the
clues are to be found, i think! (Is that why you ignored it)? dunno.gif wink.gif

In the OP's many posts, it looks like you're addressing several different people, but none in particular.

I can only offer comments to a couple:

For the most part, debris' falling from impact facade, looks like it consist mostly of pieces of alu. claddings,
as these pieces are long and narrow.

I think it will be rather difficult to prove that the 'oscillations' in the tower was caused by a plane. It could also
have been caused solely by the explosions, i think. (But i'm naturally biased, of course)!

Cheers
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post May 7 2012, 11:43 PM
Post #4



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Tamborine man @ May 7 2012, 11:11 PM) *
I have always been under the impression that "the no plane theory" first really started with the 'birth' of the 'Pentacon forum'
back in 2007.



You thought wrong.

Click....
http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...showtopic=13622

Click...
http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...showtopic=10864

then click...
http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...hp?showforum=24
(be sure to adjust the drop down to "the beginning" on the lower right)

Note the dates....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tamborine man
post May 8 2012, 08:35 AM
Post #5





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 951
Joined: 1-July 07
From: Australia
Member No.: 1,315



QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 6 2012, 02:43 AM) *
You thought wrong.

Click....
http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...showtopic=13622

Click...
http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...showtopic=10864

then click...
http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...hp?showforum=24
(be sure to adjust the drop down to "the beginning" on the lower right)

Note the dates....



I did - and humbly stand corrected.

Must admit that i never visited LCF, so missed out on this very interesting debate in those days!
(Not much has changed since then, it seems).

A few posts, from the threads you linked to, caught my attention -

'weknow', a.o.t., wrote:
"But this hologram story even its true you know we cant talk about this !
Its really difficult to make people understand what happened that day and you want to add the no-plane theory ???
Please don't, its already difficult like this."

'LiveFreeOrDieTrying' wrote:
"Even if no planes hit the towers, we have better change of exposing 9/11 by saying they did".

Strange really, what goes on in some peoples mind!
One "truther" is filled with fear, while the other
"truther" doesn't mind telling fibs!!

Nevertheless, i'll continue to defend the 'no plane theory' with regards to pentagon and Shanksville,
and looking forward to see if i at least will be able to come to an agreement with Onesliceshort, as
formulated in my previous post.

Cheers

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: May 8 2012, 08:41 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post May 8 2012, 09:01 AM
Post #6



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Tamborine man @ May 8 2012, 08:35 AM) *
I did - and humbly stand corrected.


You're welcome TM!

Many feel that the NPT was/is an orchestrated disinformation campaign in order to obfuscate and marginalize the research done at the Pentagon and Shanksville during that time.

The NPT was running rampant at the time significant findings were being uncovered in Pentagon Research. Much of those people who started the NPT back then are no longer around.

Case in point....
http://www.infowars.com/is-nico-haupt-a-co...ro-operative-2/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bpete1969
post May 15 2012, 09:58 PM
Post #7





Group: Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: 8-April 12
Member No.: 6,775



QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 8 2012, 09:01 AM) *
You're welcome TM!

Many feel that the NPT was/is an orchestrated disinformation campaign in order to obfuscate and marginalize the research done at the Pentagon and Shanksville during that time.

The NPT was running rampant at the time significant findings were being uncovered in Pentagon Research. Much of those people who started the NPT back then are no longer around.

Case in point....
http://www.infowars.com/is-nico-haupt-a-co...ro-operative-2/



Unfortunately, NPT will remain alive as long as people like Fetzer have the ability to get their hands on a keyboard.

As for disinfo...consider the method of presentation by the number one proponent of the theory. He makes a totally subjective claim and relies on facts that lay on the periphery of his main argument to bolster the main claim. When that fails, he uses the "only a fool would disagree" ploy and then states that he has proven his case. Any question you pose or rebuttal you offer is immediately dismissed and then he ridicules you for being a "disappointment" to him, or that he expected better of you and you failed. He then tries to throw you off by inundating you with links to all of his past works on the subject as if the fact they are print on a webpage makes then definitive proof that he is right and you are wrong. When that fails, he then falls back on his education and PhD as a way to intimidate you.
Uncle Fetzer was made for disinfo....and you have to commend him on doing the job well, for a time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- onesliceshort   R. I. P. - No Plane Theory   May 2 2012, 10:56 PM
- - onesliceshort   Post 2. The impact hole http://img114.imageshack...   May 2 2012, 10:57 PM
- - onesliceshort   Post 3. The claim that the tower didn't budge (an...   May 2 2012, 10:58 PM
- - onesliceshort   Post 4. The claim that modification of the witnes...   May 2 2012, 11:01 PM
- - onesliceshort   Post 5. (please read thoroughly) The claim that h...   May 2 2012, 11:04 PM
- - onesliceshort   Post 6. Miscellaneous: "Fade to black...   May 2 2012, 11:06 PM
- - onesliceshort   Post 7. My own 2cents on other technology to aid ...   May 2 2012, 11:08 PM
- - amazed!   Terrific work OSS! I especially liked the foo...   May 3 2012, 03:04 PM
- - rob balsamo   Good work OSS... I've never actually before s...   May 3 2012, 05:24 PM
|- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 3 2012, 10:24 PM...   May 3 2012, 09:36 PM
- - Tamborine man   Hey, hold on just a minute or two here, dear OSS a...   May 4 2012, 11:54 AM
- - rob balsamo   QUOTE Every person in the whole 'wide' wor...   May 4 2012, 12:31 PM
- - onesliceshort   TM, I think the insinuation about Snowcrash and th...   May 4 2012, 10:19 PM
|- - Tamborine man   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ May 3 2012, 01:19 ...   May 5 2012, 04:54 AM
|- - Tamborine man   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ May 3 2012, 01:19 ...   May 7 2012, 02:04 AM
- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (tm)My worry is this: By declaring NPT for ...   May 7 2012, 09:02 AM
|- - Tamborine man   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ May 5 2012, 12:02 ...   May 7 2012, 11:11 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (Tamborine man @ May 7 2012, 11:11 ...   May 7 2012, 11:43 PM
|- - Tamborine man   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 6 2012, 02:43 AM...   May 8 2012, 08:35 AM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (Tamborine man @ May 8 2012, 08:35 ...   May 8 2012, 09:01 AM
|- - bpete1969   QUOTE (rob balsamo @ May 8 2012, 09:01 AM...   May 15 2012, 09:58 PM
|- - rob balsamo   QUOTE (bpete1969 @ May 15 2012, 09:58 PM)...   May 15 2012, 11:37 PM
- - amazed!   Famous line from Cool Hand Luke--what we have here...   May 8 2012, 08:44 AM
|- - Tamborine man   QUOTE (amazed! @ May 6 2012, 11:44 AM...   May 8 2012, 09:04 AM
- - onesliceshort   QUOTE Nevertheless, i'll continue to defend th...   May 8 2012, 03:19 PM
|- - Tamborine man   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ May 6 2012, 06:19 ...   May 9 2012, 01:52 AM
|- - elreb   QUOTE (Tamborine man @ May 8 2012, 07:52 ...   May 10 2012, 06:44 PM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (elreb @ May 11 2012, 08:14 AM) I f...   May 11 2012, 07:22 AM
- - amazed!   Agreed, Elreb!   May 11 2012, 02:56 PM
- - Tamborine man   Agreed, elreb - Cheers   May 11 2012, 10:48 PM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (Tamborine man @ May 12 2012, 12:18...   May 12 2012, 04:32 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (23investigator @ May 12 2012, 06:0...   Jun 4 2015, 06:07 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (23investigator @ Jun 4 2015, 07:37...   Jun 6 2015, 02:32 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (23investigator @ Jun 6 2015, 04:02...   Jun 10 2015, 05:30 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (23investigator @ Jun 10 2015, 07:0...   Jun 12 2015, 05:27 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (23investigator @ Jun 12 2015, 06:5...   Jun 14 2015, 07:41 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (23investigator @ Jun 14 2015, 09:1...   Jun 19 2015, 11:51 AM
|- - NP1Mike   QUOTE (23investigator @ Jun 19 2015, 10:5...   Jun 19 2015, 05:11 PM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jun 20 2015, 06:41 AM) A...   Jun 20 2015, 01:03 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jun 20 2015, 06:41 AM) A...   Jun 20 2015, 01:03 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jun 20 2015, 06:41 AM) A...   Jun 20 2015, 01:05 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Jun 20 2015, 06:41 AM) A...   Jun 20 2015, 01:05 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (23investigator @ Jun 20 2015, 02:3...   Jun 24 2015, 05:04 AM
- - amazed!   Robert For me, all 3 of those YouTubes were ...   May 12 2012, 11:34 AM
|- - 23investigator   QUOTE (amazed! @ May 13 2012, 01:04 A...   May 12 2012, 08:21 PM
- - onesliceshort   Bump   Feb 20 2014, 06:23 AM
- - onesliceshort   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ Feb 20 2014, 11:23...   Feb 24 2014, 08:38 PM
- - NP1Mike   QUOTE (onesliceshort @ Feb 24 2014, 07:38...   Feb 24 2014, 09:40 PM
- - Alpha66   QUOTE (NP1Mike @ Feb 24 2014, 09:40 PM) I...   Jun 3 2015, 08:44 AM
- - NP1Mike   QUOTE (Alpha66 @ Jun 3 2015, 07:44 AM) PL...   Jun 3 2015, 06:47 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th December 2019 - 03:13 PM