One Picture Worth A Thousand Words, ::picture of WTC Ground Zero:: Options

[Fatrix]

Is this supposed to look like the structural failure of two 110-story buildings? Doesn't look like a structural failure to me.... more like, the resault of a controlled demolition. What do you think?

(IMG:http://haznata.com/wtcgroundzero2.jpg)

CLICK HERE TO ENLARGE (3413x2730)

[grizz]

Yep. That's not a stack of pancakes.

[Lights]

Yep, looks like a controlled demolition.

[Robyn623]

I don't know how anyone could take a look at that picture and think the floors collapsed on top of each other.

[Fatrix]

I don't know how anyone could take a look at that picture and think the floors collapsed on top of each other.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif) Pffft.... tin-foil-hat weirdos!

[waterdancer]

Now that would have been a good position to have been in to show the massive hole, er I mean smoke on WTC 7 clearly, huh? Of course, the smoke from WTC 6 would have gotten in the way, but at least we would have known they were trying if we had a 9/11 pic from that angle with that kind of resolution...

Instead, I now have about 100 or so images from the West St./Vesey area and pretty much zilch as far as showing lower (below floor ten, say) south face (or smoke). Shots from the east, shots from the west, a shot from the roof of WTC 5, I've seen all of those. Still haven't seen any massive hole (except in the SW corner, of course).

[forester]

what should the pile look like if it was brought down by structural failure?

[waterdancer]

Probably more concrete, for one thing, even if we assume a total collapse. The first two images are borrows from a "debunking site", which seems to have gotten them from here. If it was not a complete collapse (much more likely) it would proably look more like some of the earthquake damage photos which you may have seen. Still, lots of concrete. Now, I'll grant you that these pictures aren't of steel frame buildings which had fires in them. Still, last time I checked, fires don't generally turn concrete into microscopic concrete powder. CDs do. Highly unlikely that it would look like a bunch of pickup sticks scattered around on the ground for hundreds of feet in all directions, IMO.
3rd - 5th images source
Image 6 source
images 7 and 8 source
(IMG:http://911myths.com/assets/images/aplaza.gif)
(IMG:http://911myths.com/aPlaza_Big.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.djc.com/stories/images/20040325/Failures_LAmbiancePlaza.JPG)
(IMG:http://www.djc.com/stories/images/20040325/Failures_FairfaxCollapse.JPG)
(IMG:http://www.djc.com/stories/images/20040325/Failures_FairfaxCollapse2.JPG)
(IMG:http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/collapse/docs/ronanpt.gif)
(IMG:http://web.archive.org/web/19980129115748/http://eqe.com/publications/kobe/building/bu17-30.jpg) (IMG:http://web.archive.org/web/19980129115748/http://eqe.com/publications/kobe/building/bu26c30.jpg)

This post has been edited by waterdancer: Nov 10 2006, 03:36 AM

[v2rot8]

Maybe the same folks who planned and constructed the "Big Dig" in Boston are the same ones who built the WTC, only years earlier.

[Paul]

I dont see any floors pancaked on top of each other at ground zero, so obvious it was a controlled demolition, it certainly was not a pancake collapse, all i see is a huge f*cking crater at ground zero where the towers sat like someone planted a huge bomb in the basement.