IPBFacebook




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
9/11 Crash Test, 9/11 Crash Test proposes a scientific experiment

NP1Mike
post Dec 19 2016, 09:26 PM
Post #21





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 667
Joined: 25-November 13
Member No.: 7,592



QUOTE (yankee451 @ Dec 19 2016, 08:41 PM) *
Have you seen this video?

What Cut The Plane Shaped Hole?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiLa_CyFAIM


Yes he did. You posted about this before.

Steve, try this little 'experiment'.

Get a scale model of the twin towers, or draw a 110 story building on paper or using a computer program.

It wasn't by coincidence that during 9/11 the media's cameras focused on the top 30 or 40 stories of the towers.
It made the towers seem smaller. Much smaller.

Now take a good hard look at all 110 stories of your model buildings.

Put a gash in floors 92-98 of WTC1 and floors 78-84 of WTC2.

Now sit back and gaze at these models for a little while.


Try as best as you can to imagine each structure collapsing perfectly straight down in its own
footprint as a result of the small damage you see to the structures, near their top.


It happens in cartoons, not in real life.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Dec 27 2016, 04:32 PM
Post #22





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,158
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (yankee451 @ Dec 19 2016, 09:41 PM) *
Have you seen this video?

What Cut The Plane Shaped Hole?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiLa_CyFAIM



Yes, I have seen that video, and commented on it here. It is most informative, and unusual to see 15 years later. There is no doubt in my mind that the buildings were prepared for the events, and the removal of certain minor structural members as the video explains make perfect sense.

That said, the inclusion in the video of an imitation "Little Boy" from Hiroshima or Nagasaki is downright comical, and a fair misrepresentation of the nuclear theory. If you really want to understand and appreciate the case for nukes, read Jeff Prager's works. The nuclear theory IMO is the only coherent theory in explaining all the observed damage, including the rare cancers manifest in so many workers there.

Just because the building was prepared in so many ways DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN that an airplane could not have struck the building. The 2 facts are not mutually exclusive.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd September 2017 - 01:41 PM