Is The 86-year-old Queen Of England Off Her Rocker? Options

[paulmichael]

http://news.yahoo.com/spirited-queen-happy...spt.html?_esi=1

The Queen made her film debut in a James Bond movie. What was she thinking? Is she out to lunch?

Doesn't she find objection with the smut scenes that are typical of Bond movies and with these scenes' corrupting influence on the children of her country and of here, too.

Actually, the smut is the least of it. These days, kiddies identify more with the cinema's megalomaniacal international villains than with superheroes and with truth, justice, and the American way. What an evil influence! No wonder there is so much bullying in schools and other forms of anti-social, criminal behavior on the part of youth. Some people, especially urbanized ones, use such films and villainous characters as their blueprints for their very being and future.

I was really starting to worry about the Queen, when she, not so long ago, received and honored superfreak, Lady Gaga. Have you ever viewed a Lady Gaga music video? Those videos are absolutely twisted, hedonistic caldrons of perversion. If you have the stomach for it, I suggest you view Lady Gaga's "Telephone" video, the full version on Youtube. What is really shocking about this video is that superstar Beyonce collaborated with Lady Gaga by making a significant co-starring appearance.

What was the Queen thinking? What was Beyonce thinking? Are they out to lunch?

OK, here comes the 9/11 tie-in...

Shortly after 9/11, Rudy Giuliani flew out to England for an audience with the Queen during which she dubbed him an "honorary knight." What was she thinking? Controversy about 9/11 and Rudy Giuliani's role in it were already swirling all around Giuliani, but she goes ahead and dubs this guy an honorary knight anyway. Let us not forget that the Constitution of the Unites States of America explicitly bans titles of nobility, but this apparently didn't bother Giuliani or the Queen in the least. What was the Queen thinking? I can assume what a jerk like Ghouliani was thinking. (In my book, an honorary title IS a title!)

Let us not forget that civil engineers and other experts requested permission to examine the ruins of the WTC, particularly of WTC7, to learn exactly why those structures failed, but Ghouliani flatly refused saying that the debris had to be cleared away fast, fast, fast and valuable evidence went bye, bye!

If I remember correctly, as a result of 9/11, many local governments received grants from the federal government to combat (contrived and fictional) terrorism. In the first year alone, the Ghouliani administration, if I am correct, received $53,000,000,000 to this end. Do know where this and subsequent grants went? Don't ask me.

The $53Bil grant is conspicuously absent from the list of possible motives behind 9/11 that appeared in the "Why?" post in the Library forum (http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=148).

Also conspicuously absent is the fact that the Taliban is a religious organization, not a terrorist one, that prior to the war banned upwards of 95% of the heroin production of Afghanistan which came back with a vengeance after the war commenced. (Note: Ghouliani had a background in narcotics while working in the Manhattan office of the U.S. Attorney's office.)

Also conspicuously absent is the fact that Afghanistan is sitting on $1,000,000,000,000 worth of commodities wealth in the form of lithium and copper. Ghouliani had an association with international fugitive Marc Rich while Ghouliani was a U.S. Attorney. Marc Rich had been involved in commodities trading.

And one last "Why?" Why, it's the sale of armaments to the so-called insurgents of Iraq and Afghanistan. Marc Rich had been involved in the sale of armaments in his past.

What was the Queen thinking?

What was the whole government of England thinking when choosing to get involved with the U.S. in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? This I simply cannot fathom this. Why, why, why?

Paul Michael

[23investigator]

http://news.yahoo.com/spirited-queen-happy...spt.html?_esi=1

What was the Queen thinking?

What was the whole government of England thinking when choosing to get involved with the U.S. in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? This I simply cannot fathom this. Why, why, why?

Paul Michael

Dear 'Paul Michael'

Now this is more like it.

Keep out of the 'women in power thing', it will only get you "bad press", especially from those who don't understand the point you are making.

If you get the drift.

Robert S

[23investigator]

http://news.yahoo.com/spirited-queen-happy...spt.html?_esi=1

What was the Queen thinking?

What was the whole government of England thinking when choosing to get involved with the U.S. in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? This I simply cannot fathom this. Why, why, why?

Paul Michael

Dear 'Paul Michael'

Now this is more like it.

Keep out of the 'women in power thing', it will only get you "bad press", especially from those who don't understand the point you are making.

If you get the drift.

Robert S

[paulmichael]

Dear 'Paul Michael'

Now this is more like it.

Keep out of the 'women in power thing', it will only get you "bad press", especially from those who don't understand the point you are making.

If you get the drift.

Robert S

Robert S.,

Please check your private messages.

Thank you!

Paul