IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Kara And The C130 Pilot, Deception?

vancegreen37
post Jun 2 2014, 08:18 PM
Post #21





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 16
Joined: 30-July 09
From: Earth
Member No.: 4,517



Steven O' Brien's recorded interview is available at the National Archives and Records Administration Open Public Access link for everyone to hear: www.archives.gov/research/search. Click Open Public Access and enter 7788028 in the search box to hear the interview.

Best of luck

Vance
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
onesliceshort
post Jun 3 2014, 11:06 AM
Post #22



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



QUOTE (vancegreen37 @ Jun 3 2014, 01:18 AM) *
Steven O' Brien's recorded interview is available at the National Archives and Records Administration Open Public Access link for everyone to hear: www.archives.gov/research/search. Click Open Public Access and enter 7788028 in the search box to hear the interview.

Best of luck

Vance


Thanks Vance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
onesliceshort
post Jun 3 2014, 06:58 PM
Post #23



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



I went to Loose Change Forums to "talk" to "Boonedoggled" who claimed that this interview "proved once and for all" that the C130 flew as per RADES. No, it doesn't!

Kara skipped from the takeoff to O'Brien's encounter with this aircraft. We know that every interview before and since the 2004 Kara interview, that the Mall is referred to repeatedly.

He tried to trivialize the upwards of two minutes of discrepancies between the proven manipulated ATC recordings timeframes, coupled with O'Brien's claim that he was up by 09:31. A timeframe mentioned not by O'Brien, but by Kara which points to an earlier interview that we know nothing about. The source of what is a very specific timeframe is never revealed.

FTR, a 2 minute discrepancy could bring O'Brien further north towards the Mall. Or north of Reagan.

Boonedoggled also claimed that the "start" of the bank O'Brien described at his "12 o'clock" position may he explained by the "eratic" nature of the bank during the alleged loop. Wrong. The NTSB animation shows no level flight or shallow bank during the alleged area before where the C130 and this plane intersected. It was in a constant bank according to the official story. Full stop.

I had only just got started when the usual sidelining began of witnesses who described the C130 approaching from the northwest in a southern trajectory; wordplay on the ambiguity of a section of the interview where O'Brien claimed that he had to "turn right" and "to the south" to avoid the smokeplume (how would O'Brien feel he was to "turn south" when he was allegedly heading northeasterly??), then the usual nonsense where he planted the "he watched it fly into the Pentagon" in to the mix.

It's got to the point where I don't get angry any more talking to these people. They're history as far as I'm concerned.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th December 2019 - 02:47 PM