IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

A Summary By An 'anonymous Us Military Controlled Demolitions Expert', Expert Opinion welcomed

Obwon
post Apr 19 2011, 07:59 AM
Post #1





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 577
Joined: 29-November 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,712



Here's an attempt to quantify the logistics of the explosives and manpower of operation twin towers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.veronicachapman.com/nyc911/911TruthMilitary.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: While the author seems to be uninformed or misinformed about other segments of the 9-11 attacks, (mentions global hawk, missile, etc). that should not take away from his apparent expertise in the area of explosives. Enough said.

It appears this took a year or perhaps more to complete. Giving ever more meaning to things
that transpired going back to that time and perhaps a bit further, than we had ever assigned.
Perhaps, also, more details can be found in the transcripts and anecdotes of those times that qualify as suspicious activity. But more important, will be the ideas of any explosives experts,
who can further flesh out and/or correct any of this.

Obwon
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
SanderO
post Apr 19 2011, 12:36 PM
Post #2





Group: Troll
Posts: 1,174
Joined: 23-December 09
From: NYC
Member No.: 4,814



Having skimmed the article the author has clearly been reading too much fiction. The buildings came down MOSTLY driven by gravity, with perhaps some engineering applied to initiate the collapses. There is no evidence of cutter charges, and the core columns outlasted the collapse/destruction of the floors... with many of the standing as high as 70+ stories before toppling over having inadequate bracing which was destroyed by the collapsing floors. No mini nukes required.

The fact is that the twin towers were a rather new design with a flimsy floor system spanning between the perimeter core columns and the facade columns. The latter peeled away, broke apart at the bolted connections... the former (core columns) toppled from Euler buckling when the bracing was ripped off by the collapsing floors. Columns were strong and were not crushed in the collapse phase. The author simply hasn't studied the towers and their weakness and shows little comprehension of structural engineering.

If you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th October 2019 - 01:03 PM