IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Is Iran Next On The List?

Werdna
post Oct 12 2011, 03:56 AM
Post #1





Group: Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: 14-September 11
From: Gold Coast, Australia
Member No.: 6,270



Are we witnessing an escalation in tension with the US and Iran? This has been predicted elsewhere on this, and other like-minded, forums previously - but is this the beginning of the opening of a 'new eastern-front'?

Source-A

Source-B

Regards,
Werdna

This post has been edited by Werdna: Oct 12 2011, 03:58 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
onesliceshort
post Oct 12 2011, 08:32 AM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 2,612
Joined: 30-January 09
Member No.: 4,095



QUOTE (Werdna @ Oct 12 2011, 08:56 AM) *
Are we witnessing an escalation in tension with the US and Iran? This has been predicted elsewhere on this, and other like-minded, forums previously - but is this the beginning of the opening of a 'new eastern-front'?

Source-A

Source-B

Regards,
Werdna


The links aren't working mate (or is it just me?).

If you're talking about the alleged plot to "assassinate" the Saudi diplomat (surprise, surprise the FBI were involved..), I'd say yes. 100%.

From Faux News:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/11...?intcmp=related

QUOTE
Rep. Michael McCaul R-Texas, said if it was indeed sponsored by the Iranian government, "this would constitute an act of war not only against the Saudis and Israelis but against the United States as well."


Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., issued a similar statement saying, "Iran's assassination of a foreign diplomat in our country would have violated both U.S. and international law, and represented an act of war."
Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, speaking on Fox News, called the plot an "act of war" against the United States.
"We have to do something," he said, saying the specifics of the response should be left up to the Defense Department and the president.

......

And Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the U.S. would work with its allies to "send a very strong message that this kind of action, which violates international norms, must be ended."
In a separate interview with the Associated Press, Clinton said the plot "crosses a line," and that she and President Obama were calling international leaders to tell them what happened. She said they want to "pre-empt" any efforts by Iran to deny responsibility, as well as "enlist more countries in working together against what is becoming a clearer and clearer threat" from Iran, according to the Associated Press. She said the reaction could "further isolate Iran."


The hypocrisy of it stinks even if it were true. Mossad/CIA have been having pot-shots at Iranian nuclear physicists on their own turf, carrying out unmanned drone missile attacks in Pakistan and bombed the crap out of Libya most recently.

And Israel? Where to start? How about here?

The assassination of Mahmoud al Mabhouh in Dubai:





Sorry for waffling mate, it just pisses me off.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sanders
post Oct 12 2011, 09:50 AM
Post #3



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 7,990
Joined: 13-September 06
Member No.: 49



In short, Yup.


The Gulf of Tonkin incident which got us into Vietnam never happened - they just made it up. This is no different. DON'T BELIEVE WHAT YOU HEAR IN THE NEWS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE TOPIC IS WAR MONGERING!

I don't like Akhmahinejidahamazama-whatever his name is, I think Islamic culture is barbaric in some ways, but they have one thing right. NO USURY!

That's why the Bankers want to blow up the Muslim world (with our taxpayer dollars and the lives of our kids) and rebuild it to their own "western" blueprint. Oil and gas are obviously a part of it too, but everyone overlooks the Muslim Usury ban ... without interest-based banking they ™ can't get their claws in, and they want to change that so they can, eventually, control this part of the world that's been on their "to do" list for a hundred years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GroundPounder
post Oct 12 2011, 11:10 AM
Post #4





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 1,748
Joined: 13-December 06
From: maryland
Member No.: 315



QUOTE (Sanders @ Oct 10 2011, 12:50 PM) *
NO USURY!


the banks and big corps have been playing gobbledy-gobbledy eating everything in sight like the blob since forever. in short order a dystopian future straight out of science fiction will emerge, because it is emerging now. think 'rollerball', 'brazil' and '1984' all rolled into one..splash in some 'soylent green', terminator' and finish off w/ take your pick.

is it iran? is it syria? pakistan? tptb don't care. they are all on the list. and when that list is finished off, they'll come for you and me, because thinking free men and women are obsolete. a danger to the machine. a pestilence to be sterilized if they cannot be incorporated into the borg hive mind. oh yes, we have done our jobs too well, being part of some giant list creating machine, only to find ourselves on the list.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd August 2019 - 04:30 PM