IPB




POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The United States Remains A British Colony Iii

Quest
post Jul 28 2010, 10:29 PM
Post #1





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 2,327
Joined: 23-October 06
Member No.: 145



Maybe LaRouche has it right after all. We may still be under British rule. But then, who rules Britain? Would that be the Rothchilds? This article also helps explain the Bolshevik Genocide or as some know it, the Bolshevik 'Revolution'.

The United States Remains a British Colony III

http://www.moneyteachers.org/British.Colony3.html

The United States Remains a British Colony IIIWhen the English Aristocracy and their Bankster Allies opposed Lincoln, in favor of the South, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation. The British people were opposed to slavery and the Proclamation drove a wedge between them and the Crown. In one stroke, Lincoln destroyed any hope the Southern States had of an open alliance with England and France.

The Banksters took a new approach. They focused their efforts at regaining control of Congress and the Republican Party. Money is the "milk-blood" of politics, and they prevailed. Lincoln was forced into a series of compromises near the end of the Civil War that doomed any chance of economic independence from the Bank of England and her minions in the US. In the words of the Chancellor of Germany (Otto Von Bismarck):

"The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the US, if they remained as one block, and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world." (Source)

With the passage of the National Bank Act, Lincoln's plans for true independence from Great Britain vanished.

"From this point on the entire US money supply would be created out of debt by bankers buying US government bonds and issuing them from reserves for bank notes. The greenbacks continued to be in circulation until 1994, their numbers were not increased but in fact decreased. "In numerous years following the war, the Federal Government ran a heavy surplus. It could not (however) pay off its debt, retire its securities, because to do so meant there would be no bonds to back the national bank notes. To pay off the debt was to destroy the money supply." (Ibid)

The reality is, that the banksters and the Bank of England lend our government its currency and charge us interest for using it (via the bonds backing it). The other reality is, that the Southern States were manipulated into a war with the North by their plantation aristocracy, who, in turn were manipulated by the Banksters of England. The whole goal was to create debt and financial slavery for ALL of the United States. The political goal was to keep us chained down to colonial status and destroy the Republic.

If the Civil War had succeeded, the Northern States would have been claimed by France, and the South would have gone to England, just as Hamilton had predicted in the "Federalist". The Rothschilds in France and England wanted to end the "Great Experiment" once and for all.

Fortunately for the North, the Czar of Russia had also resisted Rothschild demands to establish a central bank in his empire. He threatened war with France and England if they declared war on the Northern States. He even sent the Russian Navy to back up the threat with force.


The North was able to win the war and Lincoln had the political clout necessary to destroy the endless outflow of wealth to the English and French, via the Rothschilds, once and for all. As a result, he was murdered by their agents. Rothschild agents in Russia, posing as anarchists, also tried to dispatch the Czar through various assassination attempts starting in 1866. They finally succeeded in 1881.


Next came the attack on the interest-free greenbacks:

"On April 12th in 1866, the American congress passed the Contraction Act, allowing the treasury to call in and retire some of Lincoln's greenbacks... To give the American public the false impression that they would be better off under the gold standard, the money changers used the control they had to cause economic instability and panic the people. This was fairly easy to do by calling in existing loans and refusing to issue new ones, a tried and proven method of causing depression." (ibid)

The gold standard was held up by the Banksters as a means of weaning people off of their free paper currency. Economic instability made the American public desperate for a solution. The Bankster owned media railed against Lincoln's Greenbacks as the villain, when in fact, it was the removal of Greenbacks from the system that was causing the chaos.

"The supply of Greenbacks went from:
$1.8 billion in circulation in 1866 allowing $50.46 per person,
to $1.3 billion in 1867 allowing $44.00 per person,
to $0.6 billion in 1876 making only $14.60 per person and down
to $0.4 billion only ten years later leaving only $6.67 per person
and a continually growing population." (ibid)

With the retraction of the "Greenback", the Bank of England next sought to remove silver, as legal tender currency in the United States:

"By 1872 the American public was beginning to feel the squeeze, so the Bank of England... sent Ernest Seyd, with lots of money, to bribe congress into de-monetizing silver. Ernest drafted the legislation himself, which came into law with the passing of the Coinage Act, effectively stopping the minting of silver that year. Here's what he said about his trip, obviously pleased with himself. "I went to America in the winter of 1872-73, authorized to secure, if I could, the passage of a bill demonetizing silver. It was in the interest of those I represented - the governors of the Bank of England - to have it done. By 1873, gold coins were the only form of coin money." (ibid.)

Gold is such a rare commodity that it is impossible to use it as the only National currency. Silver and Gold together, have formed the foundation of solid economies throughout the ages. By removing silver from the equation, the Satanic Psychopaths were able to create an artificial demand for whatever currency they wanted to foist upon an unsuspecting public.

Here When the English Aristocracy and their Bankster Allies opposed Lincoln, in favor of the South, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation. The British people were opposed to slavery and the Proclamation drove a wedge between them and the Crown. In one stroke, Lincoln destroyed any hope the Southern States had of an open alliance with England and France.

The Banksters took a new approach. They focused their efforts at regaining control of Congress and the Republican Party. Money is the "milk-blood" of politics, and they prevailed. Lincoln was forced into a series of compromises near the end of the Civil War that doomed any chance of economic independence from the Bank of England and her minions in the US. In the words of the Chancellor of Germany (Otto Von Bismarck):

"The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the US, if they remained as one block, and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world." (Source)

With the passage of the National Bank Act, Lincoln's plans for true independence from Great Britain vanished.

"From this point on the entire US money supply would be created out of debt by bankers buying US government bonds and issuing them from reserves for bank notes. The greenbacks continued to be in circulation until 1994, their numbers were not increased but in fact decreased. "In numerous years following the war, the Federal Government ran a heavy surplus. It could not (however) pay off its debt, retire its securities, because to do so meant there would be no bonds to back the national bank notes. To pay off the debt was to destroy the money supply." (Ibid)

The reality is, that the banksters and the Bank of England lend our government its currency and charge us interest for using it (via the bonds backing it). The other reality is, that the Southern States were manipulated into a war with the North by their plantation aristocracy, who, in turn were manipulated by the Banksters of England. The whole goal was to create debt and financial slavery for ALL of the United States. The political goal was to keep us chained down to colonial status and destroy the Republic.

If the Civil War had succeeded, the Northern States would have been claimed by France, and the South would have gone to England, just as Hamilton had predicted in the "Federalist". The Rothschilds in France and England wanted to end the "Great Experiment" once and for all.

Fortunately for the North, the Czar of Russia had also resisted Rothschild demands to establish a central bank in his empire. He threatened war with France and England if they declared war on the Northern States. He even sent the Russian Navy to back up the threat with force.

The North was able to win the war and Lincoln had the political clout necessary to destroy the endless outflow of wealth to the English and French, via the Rothschilds, once and for all. As a result, he was murdered by their agents. Rothschild agents in Russia, posing as anarchists, also tried to dispatch the Czar through various assassination attempts starting in 1866. They finally succeeded in 1881.

Next came the attack on the interest-free greenbacks:

"On April 12th in 1866, the American congress passed the Contraction Act, allowing the treasury to call in and retire some of Lincoln's greenbacks... To give the American public the false impression that they would be better off under the gold standard, the money changers used the control they had to cause economic instability and panic the people. This was fairly easy to do by calling in existing loans and refusing to issue new ones, a tried and proven method of causing depression." (ibid)

The gold standard was held up by the Banksters as a means of weaning people off of their free paper currency. Economic instability made the American public desperate for a solution. The Bankster owned media railed against Lincoln's Greenbacks as the villain, when in fact, it was the removal of Greenbacks from the system that was causing the chaos.

"The supply of Greenbacks went from:
$1.8 billion in circulation in 1866 allowing $50.46 per person,
to $1.3 billion in 1867 allowing $44.00 per person,
to $0.6 billion in 1876 making only $14.60 per person and down
to $0.4 billion only ten years later leaving only $6.67 per person
and a continually growing population." (ibid)

With the retraction of the "Greenback", the Bank of England next sought to remove silver, as legal tender currency in the United States:

"By 1872 the American public was beginning to feel the squeeze, so the Bank of England... sent Ernest Seyd, with lots of money, to bribe congress into de-monetizing silver. Ernest drafted the legislation himself, which came into law with the passing of the Coinage Act, effectively stopping the minting of silver that year. Here's what he said about his trip, obviously pleased with himself. "I went to America in the winter of 1872-73, authorized to secure, if I could, the passage of a bill demonetizing silver. It was in the interest of those I represented - the governors of the Bank of England - to have it done. By 1873, gold coins were the only form of coin money." (ibid.)

Gold is such a rare commodity that it is impossible to use it as the only National currency. Silver and Gold together, have formed the foundation of solid economies throughout the ages. By removing silver from the equation, the Satanic Psychopaths were able to create an artificial demand for whatever currency they wanted to foist upon an unsuspecting public.

This post has been edited by Quest: Jul 29 2010, 08:50 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Jul 29 2010, 09:30 AM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,961
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



Gold is old
and owned by a few
a substance of value,
that seems to hold true.
and if you should find some allotted to you...
through yearnings, or earnings,
or turnings of due,
and ask a poor poet,
who follows his heart,
"If, in my position,
just where should i start
with all of this wealth
that i have in my cart?"
"It's so easy, to do."
the poor poet said
composing a verse,
in a second, that read,
"hold old cold gold"
but then it got terse,
because there is nothing,
that rhymes with silver.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omega892R09
post Jul 29 2010, 12:49 PM
Post #3





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 2,170
Joined: 29-September 07
From: Hampshire, UK.
Member No.: 2,274



QUOTE (Quest @ Jul 27 2010, 12:29 AM) *
Maybe LaRouche has it right after all. We may still be under British rule.

Beware of false messengers and those who have flip-flopped so much during their lives they no longer appear to know whichg way is up.

You may find it helpful to read this:

Lyndon LaRouche

I found these para' interesting:

QUOTE
Strategic Defense Initiative
In the mid-1980s, the LaRouche campaign was noted for its support of Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, known as "SDI" or "Star Wars." General Paul-Albert Scherer, a LaRouche supporter and former head of West German Military Counterintelligence, said in 1992 that LaRouche, whom he described as a "scientific-technological strategic expert," had been the originator of the SDI. Scherer also said LaRouche had been involved in backchannel communications between the Reagan administration and the Russian embassy, during the year before Reagan's announcement of the policy in March 1983.[76]

Physicist Edward Teller, a principal proponent of SDI and X-ray lasers, told reporters in 1984 that he had been courted by LaRouche, but kept his distance. LaRouche began calling his plan the "LaRouche-Teller proposal," though they had never met. In Teller's words, LaRouche was "a poorly informed man with fantastic conceptions."[77] LaRouche later attributed the collapse of the Soviet Union to its refusal to follow his advice to accept Reagan's offer to share the technology.[78]


The SDI is based upon junbk science as highlighted in this book:

Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud

which also helps to decide one of the non-value in manned space programs as in this:


QUOTE
[edit] Space colonization
LaRouche's promotion of space colonization included dealings with German scientists and engineers who had worked under the Nazi government in Germany during the Second World War, some of whom had emigrated to the U.S. after the war under Operation Paperclip, and had ended up working for NASA. They included Arthur Rudolph and several other Peenemunde rocket experts, such as Krafft Arnold Ehricke, Adolf Busemann, Konrad Dannenberg, and Hermann Oberth. When Rudolph was forced to renounce his U.S. citizenship after an investigation into his past, LaRouche supporters formed a defense fund for him.[77] LaRouche also collaborated with Ehricke on ideas about the colonization of the moon and Mars.[79] After Ehricke's death, LaRouche sponsored the "Krafft Ehricke Memorial Conference," and in 1988 delivered a national TV broadcast titled "The Woman on Mars."[80]


You may like to re-evalute your thoughts on Lyndon LaRouche.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Quest
post Jul 29 2010, 12:53 PM
Post #4





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 2,327
Joined: 23-October 06
Member No.: 145



I take it that subtltey is not your forte, Omega? The LaRouche comment was a throwaway. The greater point is that we are indeed under British rule.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tamborine man
post Jul 30 2010, 06:39 AM
Post #5





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 834
Joined: 1-July 07
From: Australia
Member No.: 1,315



QUOTE (lunk @ Jul 27 2010, 11:30 AM) *
Gold is old
and owned by a few
a substance of value,
that seems to hold true.
and if you should find some allotted to you...
through yearnings, or earnings,
or turnings of due,
and ask a poor poet,
who follows his heart,
"If, in my position,
just where should i start
with all of this wealth
that i have in my cart?"
"It's so easy, to do."
the poor poet said
composing a verse,
in a second, that read,
"hold old cold gold"
but then it got terse,
because there is nothing,
that rhymes with silver.



"Pilfer" - Lunk.

'Artistic License'. The best and dearest friend of humankind.


Cheers
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Jul 30 2010, 06:36 PM
Post #6



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,961
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



QUOTE (Tamborine man @ Jul 30 2010, 03:39 AM) *
"Pilfer" - Lunk.

'Artistic License'. The best and dearest friend of humankind.


Cheers


Close, but
there's no "f" in silver.
(there may be more truth in this last sentence, if read out loud, repeatedly.)
i was trying to stick to just masculine rhymes,
rather than feminine ones.

Ants, bees, and termites,
need a queen,
people don't.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sanders
post Jul 31 2010, 09:43 AM
Post #7



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 7,987
Joined: 13-September 06
Member No.: 49



QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Aug 2 2010, 11:49 AM) *
Beware of false messengers and those who have flip-flopped so much during their lives they no longer appear to know whichg way is up...


I don't consider "flip-flopping" a negative. The rabbit-hole is pretty deep, and I've flipped-flopped many times myself on the road to trying to get a handle on the big-picture.

As for "false-messengers", hehe.

All of us here are pretty aware and sensitive to that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Aug 1 2010, 12:28 AM
Post #8



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,961
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



QUOTE (Sanders @ Jul 31 2010, 06:43 AM) *
As for "false-messengers", hehe.

All of us here are pretty aware and sensitive to that.


More, and more, so.

they're everywhere, like road signs,
trying to point us back, into the Plato's cave,
away from the other, infinite possibilities.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Omega892R09
post Aug 1 2010, 07:30 AM
Post #9





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 2,170
Joined: 29-September 07
From: Hampshire, UK.
Member No.: 2,274



QUOTE (Quest @ Jul 27 2010, 03:53 PM) *
I take it that subtltey is not your forte, Omega? The LaRouche comment was a throwaway.

Poe's law strikes again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Quest
post Aug 3 2010, 01:27 PM
Post #10





Group: Valued Member
Posts: 2,327
Joined: 23-October 06
Member No.: 145



QUOTE (Omega892R09 @ Aug 1 2010, 12:30 PM) *
Poe's law strikes again.


You must be short, Omega, because they keep going over your head. But if nothing else, you are consistent.

This post has been edited by Quest: Aug 3 2010, 01:30 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lunk
post Aug 5 2010, 01:18 PM
Post #11



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 4,961
Joined: 1-April 07
Member No.: 875



QUOTE (lunk @ Jul 30 2010, 03:36 PM) *
Close, but
there's no "f" in silver.
(there may be more truth in this last sentence, if read out loud, repeatedly.)
i was trying to stick to just masculine rhymes,
rather than feminine ones.

Ants, bees, and termites,
need a queen,
people don't.


Correction: there is actually a rhyme for "silver";
"chilver", which is a female lamb.
Wonder, if that's worth a silver coin, like a chicken.

Thanks to George Ure at

http://urbansurvival.com/week.htm

for finding that out,
or just knowing of that rhyme,
in the first place.

(sorry about my poor poetry)
lol
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th June 2013 - 01:58 AM