IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Weather Weapons: The Dark World Of Environmental Warfare

Quest
post Mar 17 2014, 02:02 PM
Post #1





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 2,419
Joined: 23-October 06
Member No.: 145



Weather weapons: the dark world of environmental warfare

http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/docs...therweapons.pdf

Weather weapons:
the dark world of environmental warfare
T. J. Coles
QUOTE
Didn’t it rain
Declassified records show that from 1949 to 1955, the Royal
Air Force (RAF) released various substances, including dry ice,
silver iodide, and salt into the atmosphere at high altitudes in
order to induce rain. ‘The clouds would then precipitate, pulled
down below freezing point by the extra weight of dense
particles, thus making it rain sooner and heavier than it might
have done’, the Guardian reported.1 Using chemicals supplied
by ICI, ‘international scientists’ were involved in the
experiments, including specialists from the Cranfield College of
Aeronautics and the RAF’s meteorological research base at
Farnborough. Perhaps the most significant aspect of the
programme was that the weather weaponisation experiments
continued three years after they had produced the worst
recorded flood in British history, the Lynmouth disaster of
1952.
The Telegraph reported how ‘Former RAF servicemen.....
described how they took part in the experiments in the years
running up to the flood.’ 2 Of Project Cumulus, or Operation
Witch Doctor as it was nicknamed by Squadron Leader Len
Otley, the BBC reported how the glider pilot Alan Yates
sprayed chemicals over Bedfordshire, after which ‘Scientists
told him it caused a heavy downpour in Staines, 50 miles (80
kilometres) away in Middlesex.’3 This claim appears to be
1 John Vidal and Helen Weinstein, ‘RAF rainmakers ‘caused 1952
flood’’, disinformation because BBC radio reports confirm that the
gliders were actually spraying over Lynmouth village itself.4
Concerning the seeding operations that caused the
Lynmouth disaster, RAF Captain John Hart explained how, in
1952, ‘We flew straight through the top of the cloud, poured
dry ice down into the cloud. We flew down to see if any rain
came out of the cloud and it did, about 30 minutes later, and
we all cheered...... [senior lecturer at Cranfield College of
Aeronautics] Alan Yates said the BBC had been filming the
experiments, but the resulting programme was abandoned
when the country awoke to news of the Lynmouth flood the
day before it was due to be broadcast.’5
Within a few hours of the cloud seeding operations,
some 90 million tonnes of water fell onto Lynmouth, destroying
hundreds of homes and businesses, and causing the deaths
of 35 people. Reporting in 2001, ‘a BBC investigation has
confirmed that secret experiments were causing heavy
rainfall’, though the Ministry of Defence (MOD) denied any
connection between the seeding experiments and the flood.
Initially, the MoD even denied conducting any cloud seeding
experiments at all. ‘Survivors tell how the air smelled of
sulphur on the afternoon of the floods, and the rain fell so
hard it hurt people’s faces’, the BBC reported. ‘Trees were
uprooted and formed dams behind bridges, creating walls of
water that carried huge boulders into the village, destroying
shops, hotels and homes. Bodies washed out to sea were
never found.’ The report quoted Tony Speller, a former North
Devon MP, saying that when he asked for Ministry of Defence
files, ‘I could never find anything of any consequence,
except the fact that papers were clearly missing for the
significant years [1949-55].’6
The BBC reported 34 deaths and the newspapers 35,
and a decade later the BBC documentary Country Tracks
(broadcast in 2011) confirmed that one corpse — perhaps a
member of the secret services dispatched to monitor the
operations — could not be accounted for. ‘[D]ocuments
express concern by the [Ministry of Defence] over who would
be financially liable if such rainmaking experiments went
wrong’, the Telegraph reported, ending with a citation from a
Ministry of Defence statement made in 2001 in light of the
revelations: ‘Cloud seeding has rarely been successful
anywhere in the world. Consequently the Met Office had not
pursued this line of research for many years.’7 The MoD not
only contradicted itself then, because its earlier statements
denied involvement in any cloud seeding operations, but it
contradicted itself in 2010 by announcing in a public document
that out to 2040:


QUOTE
Coupled with the Pentagon’s commitment to achieve Full
Spectrum Dominance by 2020, the fact that the MoD and the
US Air Force had the capability to destroy an entire village with
90 million tonnes of rainfall as far back as the 1950s, means
we must take seriously the possibility that weather
weaponisation is being used, under the cover of
anthropogenic global warming (which is no doubt happening,
but provides a perfect cover for freak weather events). The US
Air Force 2025 think-tank stated in a long-term study that
weather weaponisation ‘provides opportunities to impact
operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent
to all possible futures.’ The US Air Force is counting on the fact
that ‘some segments of society will always be reluctant to
examine controversial issues such as weather-modification.’9
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kaz
post Mar 17 2014, 07:45 PM
Post #2





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 53
Joined: 11-December 08
Member No.: 4,021



Cloud seeding isn't a secret. It's been experimented with for decades and in many different countries with many different results from no rain to heavy downpours. If it was this perfect science then don't you think countries that experience long droughts would use it all the time? The knowledge of how to do this is openly available to anyone who cares to look it up. The example you raise looks like an early experiment and IF everything you say is true then perhaps liability should be imposed on these perpetrators. Was a Storm happening anyway? And did this seeding make it more intense? Had this area experienced severe flooding like this in the past? It does seem like a devastating one off event. And was most likely made worse by the experiments in seed clouding. Seed clouding is so unpredictable that for it to be used as an effective weapon seems highly unlikely with very mixed results. Look at the Dam Busters where walls of water were released causing far more devastation but it only slowed down the German war effort.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Mar 17 2014, 08:14 PM
Post #3



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (kaz @ Mar 17 2014, 07:45 PM) *
The knowledge of how to do this is openly available to anyone who cares to look it up.



Yeah... "Quest" and his cohorts have been given this link many times...

http://www.weathermodification.com/

The fact that people such as "Quest" use an example from WWII to compare to today's technology reeks of desperation.

Hey "Quest", where are the Al/Ba tapes/results from Hancke? And why has he not released the information/tapes in nearly 5 years?

Your cohorts do not seem to want to answer this question.. .and if you just come here to post hit-n-run BS as you have done above... guess what happens next?

smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tamborine man
post Mar 18 2014, 02:24 AM
Post #4





Group: Active Forum Pilot
Posts: 951
Joined: 1-July 07
From: Australia
Member No.: 1,315



Once upon a time, a young African 'rainmaker' visited Australia.

A TV show host here - Don Lane - wanted to have some fun with this chap,
and challenged him to 'prove' his powers to an audience.
The TV people found a little outback town and surrounding area where it
hadn't rained for 'many many' months!
They brought the 'rainmaker' out to this godforsaken place, and asked him
to perform his "miracles" while the cameras were rolling.
Smearing himself with some paint and got dressed with his 'rainmaker' outfit
he started to dance.
While the audience and the town-folks looked on with 'wry' amusements at
the totally blue sky and the 'performance', suddenly more and more clouds
started to form, and lo and behold - it soon started to rain!

I tried to find a video of this event, but couldn't find anything. Instead i came
across this video showing our dear Don Lane in full blast, dealing with another
'entity' readers might be more familiar with! biggrin.gif





Cheers

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: Mar 18 2014, 02:27 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Mar 18 2014, 10:25 AM
Post #5





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Mar 18 2014, 12:14 PM) *
...where are the Al/Ba tapes/results from Hancke? And why has he not released the information/tapes in nearly 5 years?

Your cohorts do not seem to want to answer this question....


Cohort MikeR again attempts to get across the mindfield gap, Rob.
Sorry to disappoint you, but this cohort has no personal connection
with Herr Hancke. I presume Quest may also have no oo-la-la
phone number or special link to reach him?

Give us a clue here Rob.... why do you think any cohorts might bow to
your implied wishes and try and co-opt this guy to do whatever it is you
personally demand (viz: release more information that you assume
has been released) ....when you seem to have such little interest in
the iimportant information already pasted in front of you?

I have provided that information, from the one source I happen to have found,
that in at least one "man made cloud", Al and Ba is 240% more concentrated
than the same materials are found in air samples at ground level.

In the total absence, of any imaginable alternative source of these 2
toxic materials in the air you and I breathe, it is a reasonable interim,
if not definitive, position to adopt that the source of said toxic
material is the "man made cloud" in which samples of the stuff were collected.

If the implications, of risk, danger and tautological threat to your health
of this now-answered question, are not blatantly obviously to you and your own
cohorts, then by all means give us all the benefit of your thoughts on what?
alternative causation might identifiably exist.

How does Al and Ba come to be 240% more concentrated, if the source is something
other than the "man made cloud" that (y)our intrepid aircrew flew Herr Hancke into?

Methinks you pull my wotsit if you expect a non-scientist on the other side
of the world to get the Director to cut us a private viewing of his movie,
as well as explain by whatever due process might satisfy your slender curiosity
whether they have or have not achieved whatever research conclusions of which
I have no more knowledge than your goodself. I am in no better position to
provide further enlightenment.

Feel free to carry on your own research in whatever way you deem best advisable....
but why not come down once in a blue, to the non-pilots' low altitude and pilot your
inspired thoughts re the one test on the table.

You can thank me later for saving (y)our not-nsignificant expense of fruitless
high-altitude high-pressure testing. You've avoided for now, the unenviable obligation
of futile flying incognito up a Boeing exhaust pipe.... whistle.gif

Herr Hancke's interim position does align very closely with the outcome of similar
investigations available from many other sources. Go check the following (but don't
stop there), then tell us what is so fracking unbelievable about the fact that
concentrations of Al and Ba HAVE been scientifically uncovered that should give
Pilots for 9/11 Truth as much cause for concern as it does Non-Pilots?

All Ps and NPs whose MDs are unable to provide any therapeutic remedies
for the many mysterious maladies with which we are all increasingly afflicted,
should consider some or all of the evidence revealed
here + here + here + here + here

Incidentally, some very-valid alternative answers to very-real health challenges arising from
"man made clouds" aka "persistent contrails" are provided by this
highly-skilled specialist naturopath doctor Gwen Scott, ND
(no affiliation)

MikeR







Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Mar 18 2014, 11:37 AM
Post #6



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (MikeR @ Mar 18 2014, 10:25 AM) *
but this cohort has no personal connection
with Herr Hancke.


Then why would you listen to anything he has to say on some boring radio interview made nearly a year ago without any proof whatsoever of his claims?

Again, all you have provided as evidence is some radio interview with some guy who claims to have collected samples from nearly 5 years ago... .but for some reason is holding onto the proof/tapes.

If you are still confused, get evidence, get the tapes proving the samples came from altitudes claimed, the full study, then we will talk. Until then, you have provided nothing of interest and the YT views reflect as such.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MikeR
post Mar 18 2014, 02:37 PM
Post #7





Group: Private Forum Pilot
Posts: 162
Joined: 29-February 12
Member No.: 6,710



QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Mar 19 2014, 03:37 AM) *
Then why would you listen to anything he has to say on some boring radio interview made nearly a year ago without any proof whatsoever of his claims?

Again, all you have provided as evidence is some radio interview with some guy who claims to have collected samples from nearly 5 years ago... .but for some reason is holding onto the proof/tapes.

If you are still confused, get evidence, get the tapes proving the samples came from altitudes claimed, the full study, then we will talk. Until then, you have provided nothing of interest and the YT views reflect as such.


Meanwhile the water is boiling, but the frog is getting warmer
so slowly the poor critter hasn't a clue it's being cooked alive.

If you don't have a thermometer.... one other test is to get
NMS Labs to check the Barium content in a hair sample.

The results confirm we are all dying frogs not immortal princes

MikeR
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
almerie
post Mar 19 2014, 12:00 AM
Post #8





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 96
Joined: 13-March 10
Member No.: 4,959



QUOTE (MikeR @ Mar 18 2014, 02:37 PM) *
If you don't have a thermometer.... one other test is to get
NMS Labs to check the Barium content in a hair sample.


Not really a scientific approach...

IF elevated contents of heavy metals are found when analyzing a hair sample, then you still have to connect the dots (evidence) to chemtrails.

Hair samples may contain elevated levels of heavy metals for any number of reasons:

Hair samples
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th October 2019 - 01:02 AM