Greetings, rookie with questions Options

[thorshammer1999]

Hello gentlmen; my name is David. It is a pleasure to sign up and although i am very late to the party so to speak, I hope another member can be helpful. I am not a pilot but time and finances willing, I would like to be one in the future. I consider myself not an unintelligent person, and yet I am only recently becoming aware of what really transpired on 9/11 . I guess I swallowed the official line after that terrible day; being young and busy with life I didn't really look into anything in detail. Once in a while some unusual fact would pop up that would make you go "hmm", but you could shake it off and tell yourself the truth will come out if there is something to it. Now it's almost 11 years later (where did the time go), and nothing has really been done. I would say that most people still do not know what really happened, and that is the big problem I gather. When I mention things I have discovered and show people video compilations I threw together, they are shocked and appalled. I have a few questions and comments so i'll get right to it. Please bare with me as I am a rookie here I guess.

I have read that the engine found in NY, the engine found in the crater in shanksville and the engine found at the pentagon are all from 737's. Is this true? (or also skyhawk for the pentagon one)
The plane that hit the south tower would appear to be a modified 737 from sources I've come across (pod, remote antennas, etc). Is this correct?
The small white plane identified by witnesses in shanksville is most likely a Saab Jet? This same plane was also spotted guiding the planes into the trade towers, and the plane at the pentagon. The link I'll post is to a Rense.com page about the white jet. small white jet


The Pentagon issue is confusing. I didn't think a commercial plane had hit the Pentagon at first; my inclination was for a missile or a smaller plane like the skyhawk. When I saw the citizen investigation team report about the confirmation of a Northern approach and possible fly over and the staged taxi cab/light poles I was convinced of the "no big plane" theory. However, the engine and landing gear found at the Pentagon, as far as I know, can be from a 737. If we assume (yikes, I know), that they were using modified 737 drones in NY which were to be remotely guided to their targets, why have a different type for the Pentagon?..the friend or foe signal element? Would this matter if the defenses were just ordered to not shoot by Cheney?

Also, why bother with a flyover that could be seen possibly? There were quite a few witnesses that saw the southern approach (a few are questionable I know). Perhaps a modified 737 simply fired off its missile like in NY but was then exploded before impact to make sure there was nothing left of it to show it was a 737 while the missile did all the internal damage?
This , however makes the obviously staged light poles/cab issue redundant then, as there would be no need to fake that; unless they just wanted to clear the expected path of obstacles first and threw in the cab damage for effect. But this again takes us back to Mr England, who changed his whole story about where he was when the event happened. Why would he change his position if there was no real Northern approach (rhetorical question).

The time of the attack also seems confusing. The stopped clocks and watch of April Gallop attest to a 9:30-9:32 double explosion, after which she crawled out the hole in the wall. The soon to be Danish prime minister among others, marks this time as the time the Pentagon was attacked. The alleged flight recorder from 77, and the 9/11 commision, however, state the time of the attack as 9:37.
Unless there were two completely seperate massive explosions, only one of those times can be the correct one. I would choose Ms Gallops testimony over the 9/11 commission any day, which would mean the plane or whatever it was must have struck at 9:30-9:32. I have read that Gen Larry Arnold sent a fighter to recon the Pentagon and that this may have been the blip that came down in a sprial to the pentagon, passing just below 500 feet and thus disappearing from radar like it had crashed into the Pentagon. If this is so, and the 9/11 commission used its track for the alleged flight 77 approach, the actual attack apparently being tracked by Cheney and company as it closed in is another contact?.. So many confusing possibilities and I am just trying to get the facts straight so any assistance would be welcomed.

I have also read that flights 77 and 11 were not scheduled to fly on the 11th. Is this true, and if so, is this commonplace or highly unusual?

On a side note, I came across this footage of debris in the street after the south tower hit. If you recall, a smoking object plunged to the earth after going through the whole building (not the engine footage). I wondered if this was the object, and what it is exactly. To my untrained eye, It looks like the tip of a warhead, but it could be something completely different; I just thought I would check.
The footage loses sound but it is not really needed. Fast forward to the 6 minute mark and it appears shortly after.
clip

Sorry for the lengthy list, but i am trying to get together a basic documentary for a major news network to hopefully run, or at least use as a framework for getting the word out.

Thanks for any info

David

This post has been edited by thorshammer1999: Jul 26 2012, 10:21 PM

[amazed!]

Welcome David! It is always good to see a person question the government story.

Yes, you ask many questions, most of which I personally do not know the answers to. We can speculate about all sorts of things, but proving them is quite another matter.

After all these years, all I can say with certainty is that the Official Story is a lie, and that the coverup is as bad as the crime, if not worse.

[rob balsamo]

Welcome David.

I did not have time to read your post thoroughly, but if you wish to post here, please use normal font. There is no need to shout (bold) in this forum unless you wish to emphasize certain phrases of your posts. Bolding and increasing the size of your entire post will not get more attention here aside from warnings.

[thorshammer1999]

Welcome David.

I did not have time to read your post thoroughly, but if you wish to post here, please use normal font. There is no need to shout (bold) in this forum unless you wish to emphasize certain phrases of your posts. Bolding and increasing the size of your entire post will not get more attention here aside from warnings.

Hello;

Not intentional Rob; I transferred the post over from a notepad document and when i attempted to add to it and make it uniform I guessed wrong on the font size.

[rob balsamo]

Fair enough my friend.... welcome to the forum.