The Doj Responds To The Grand Jury Petition, Lawyers' Committee receives a reply--US Attorney Will Comply Options

[kawika]

FULL PRESS RELEASE HERE
https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/...ponse-from-doj/

Read the 7 NOV 2018 Letter Here
https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/...c-section-3332/

[amazed!]

Excellent news!

I'll bet the mainstream media won't touch this news.

[tit2]

Excellent news if there can be a new investigation on the events of September 11, 2001 and if this new investigation can take place in good conditions, with sufficient financial means. About the first investigation:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2...11thebigcoverup

« The 9/11 Commission was hamstrung by official obstruction. It never managed to ascertain the whole truth of what happened on September 11 2001.
The chair and vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, respectively Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, assert in their book, Without Precedent, that they were "set up to fail" and were starved of funds to do a proper investigation. They also confirm that they were denied access to the truth and misled by senior officials in the Pentagon and the federal aviation authority; and that this obstruction and deception led them to contemplate slapping officials with criminal charges.
Despite the many public statements by 9/11 commissioners and staff members acknowledging they were repeatedly lied to, not a single person has ever been charged, tried, or even reprimanded, for lying to the 9/11 Commission.
From the outset, the commission seemed to be hobbled. It did not start work until over a year after the attacks. Even then, its terms of reference were suspiciously narrow, its powers of investigation curiously limited and its time-frame for producing a report unhelpfully short - barely a year to sift through millions of pages of evidence and to interview hundreds of key witnesses.
The final report did not examine key evidence, and neglected serious anomalies in the various accounts of what happened. The commissioners admit their report was incomplete and flawed, and that many questions about the terror attacks remain unanswered. Nevertheless, the 9/11 Commission was swiftly closed down on August 21 2004. »

[tit2]

I saw this video : « This Computer Simulation Explains How the Twin Towers Fell. To understand what happened to the Twin Towers on 9/11, a scientist set up an elaborate computer simulation of the event. It ended up not just predicting the manner of the collapse, but also its speed. ».

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzInIjD6nKw

If there are experts who support the official version of the facts regarding the collapse of the World Trace Center buildings, the federal grand jury will have to supervise the realisation of experiments to confront computer simulations and theories with reality. For example, this is what Jonathan H. Cole tried to do regarding the theories explaining the collapse of the Twin Towers, with this video : « 9/11 Experiments: The Force Behind the Motion » :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJNzaMRsN00

Experiments may also be made regarding NIST's explanation about the Molten Metal Seen Pouring Out of the South Tower Minutes Before its Collapse (and others facts) :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE

In my opinion, without the realisation of experiments and scientific analyzes of debris, the federal grand jury will be unable to validate a theory about the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, because there are experts who support the official version of events. A new investigation about the events of September 11, 2001, should also have concerned other facts, including the total failure of US air defense that day and the work of pilotsfor911truth.

[kawika]

I saw this video : « This Computer Simulation Explains How the Twin Towers Fell. To understand what happened to the Twin Towers on 9/11, a scientist set up an elaborate computer simulation of the event. It ended up not just predicting the manner of the collapse, but also its speed. ».

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzInIjD6nKw

If there are experts who support the official version of the facts regarding the collapse of the World Trace Center buildings, the federal grand jury will have to supervise the realisation of experiments to confront computer simulations and theories with reality. For example, this is what Jonathan H. Cole tried to do regarding the theories explaining the collapse of the Twin Towers, with this video : « 9/11 Experiments: The Force Behind the Motion » :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJNzaMRsN00

Experiments may also be made regarding NIST's explanation about the Molten Metal Seen Pouring Out of the South Tower Minutes Before its Collapse (and others facts) :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE

In my opinion, without the realisation of experiments and scientific analyzes of debris, the federal grand jury will be unable to validate a theory about the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, because there are experts who support the official version of events. A new investigation about the events of September 11, 2001, should also have concerned other facts, including the total failure of US air defense that day and the work of pilotsfor911truth.

Greening appears to not be aware of video, particularly the North Tower, showing isolated, racing ejections down the SW corner, faster than interior floors could possibly be collapsing by gravity alone. These ejections are clearly man-made.
North Tower Collapse Close Up Zoomed/Repeated - YouTube

Similar racing ejections can be seen tearing the South Tower apart, much faster than collapsing floor systems.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkGDHVc5j-M

Also notice the Smithsonian animations do not show the South Tower top tilting well off center.