IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Flight 175 - Impossible Speed?

RodA
post Nov 13 2007, 11:13 PM
Post #1





Group: Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: 13-November 07
Member No.: 2,481



Can someone who is qualified comment on this issue mentioned in 911 Scholars? The You Tube link is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Nov 14 2007, 02:35 AM
Post #2


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



welcome.gif Here is the original research.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dMz
post Nov 14 2007, 02:53 AM
Post #3



Group Icon

Group: Global Mod
Posts: 5,019
Joined: 2-October 07
From: USA, a Federal corporation
Member No.: 2,294



Has whoever recorded the 2 Boeing phone calls looked into the legality of recording?

http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/recordcalls.html

http://library.findlaw.com/1997/Jul/1/128187.html

I have always lived in "one party" states, but this is a very "sticky" area. In order for recording to be admissible in court (and legal), I'd consult with an attorney in one or both states (call originating and destination). In light of recent un-Constitutional legislation, we all need to tread carefully IMHO.

[FWIW, I once worked in aeroSPACE/defense engineering, and I likely would have referred the call to the PR or HR departments if I had answered it]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th December 2019 - 03:52 AM