IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Forget Syria. The Bigger Fish To Fry Is Japan. They

DickMcManus
post Sep 4 2013, 11:09 PM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 38
Joined: 3-December 11
From: Everett, WA, USA
Member No.: 6,507



Forget Syria. The bigger fish to fry is Japan. They are poisoning the world’s fisheries in the whole Pacific Ocean.


http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/AIPAC-say...on-Syria-325245
for Fukushima info see

http://news.sky.com/story/1135655/fukushim...18-times-higher

Sept. 4, 2013: Reuters, WASHINGTON - Three influential pro-Israel groups urged US lawmakers on Tuesday to authorize US President Barack Obama to launch an attack on Syria, signaling a stepped-up lobbying effort for American military action.


The statements by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC) represented the groups' most public show of support for US military action since the Aug. 21 attack near Damascus in which Syria's government is accused of using chemical weapons to kill more than 1,400 people.


During the past two weeks, the groups had been unusually quiet as the Obama administration sought to build a case for limited strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad's government.


Supporters of the groups and government sources acknowledged that the groups had made it known that they supported US action. But, the sources said, the groups generally want the debate to focus on US national security rather than how a decision to attack Syria might help Israel - a reflection of their sensitivity to being seen as rooting for the United States to go to war.


Even so, in recent days Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and other administration officials had emphasized that a mission to degrade Assad's chemical weapons stockpiles would reduce his ability to use them in Syria's civil war and beyond the county's borders.


They also argued that if the United States took a stand against chemical weapons in Syria, it would be a warning to Iran, the Hezbollah militant group and others that might threaten the Jewish state.


Failing to act, the administration has argued, would endanger Israel by allowing instability on its borders and emboldening Iran, which Western powers believe is developing nuclear weapons.


It was unclear precisely why the pro-Israel groups issued their statements on Tuesday. But they followed a 45-minute meeting at the White House in which administration officials briefed Jewish groups on how it is framing the debate on Capitol Hill, according to a government source who was not authorized to speak publicly.


In its statement, AIPAC called on Congress to "support the president's effort to protect American security interests" and "dissuade the Syrian regime's further use of unconventional weapons."


"The civilized world cannot tolerate the use of these barbaric weapons, particularly against an innocent civilian population including hundreds of children," the group said in its statement, which was signed by AIPAC President Michael Kassen and Howard Kohr, the chief executive.


"America must also send a forceful message of resolve to Iran and Hezbollah - both of whom have provided direct and extensive military support to Assad," the AIPAC officials said.

Israel and groups that support it are particularly sensitive to the use of chemical weapons in light of Adolf Hitler use of deadly gas during World War II. Nearly half of the estimated 6 million Jews killed during the war are widely believed to have been gassed at Nazi prison camps.


In the ADL's statement, National Chair Barry Curtiss-Lusher and National Director Abraham Foxman said that "any nation that violates international norms and obligations which threaten the peace and security of the world must face the consequences of those dangerous acts."


And in a statement posted on its web site, the RJC said, "It is imperative that the U.S. preserve its ability to protect a credible military deterrent."


'WE ARE NOT INVOLVED'


The cautious approach taken by the pro-Israel groups in the days after the Aug. 21 chemical attack in Syria was similar to that of Israel itself.


Since the rebellion against Assad began in 2011 Israel has not injected itself into Syria's civil war, a sign that however wary they are of Assad, Israeli officials also are concerned about potential chaos between warring factions in Syria if Assad were ousted.


On Tuesday, Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon sought to distance Israel from any US decision-making. "We are not involved nor are we getting involved in Syria," he said. "We reiterate this again and again."


Several US lawmakers said they had not heard from Israel on the matter of Syria.


"The Israelis will always take care of themselves. They have never asked for our military. They will never ask for anyone to defend them but themselves, and I think that Israel will be just fine," said New York Representative Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/AIPAC-say...on-Syria-325245

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PeaceWarrior
post Dec 25 2013, 07:56 AM
Post #2





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 24
Joined: 19-March 12
Member No.: 6,743




The united nation's inspectors showed the first use of chemical weapons (e.g., Sarin gas) in Syria was done so by the so called "rebels." (NOTE: Rebels = Those persons being paid roughly 100US a day/week to participate.) Why are we in Syria now? -Please see the PNAC manifesto.-)

With the latest arms purchases by Saudi Arabia (an ally to the US' current plans of global hegemony); namely, the top of the line, latest and greatest anti-tank munitions and shoulder fired missiles, it won't be long before these arms could show up in the hands of the rebels in Syria. Don't except the media's disinformation. Be careful to HAWKEYE anything they show of the rebels and their small arms or shoulder fired missiles in the coming months.

Additionally, was it just me, or did anyone else ever wonder why the rebels (as defined previously) in Libya had brand new, looked like just out of the box, NATO block small arms? Moreover, and more importantly as far as I'm concerned, where did the rebels in Libya get all those brand new looking boxes of perfectly sized ammo for the NATO block styled small arms? The propaganda outlets (i.e., the mass news media networks) kept saying they overtook some of the Libyan military's armories. Okay, that's believable for sure, but where/when/why did the Libyan army have NATO block type small arms?!? (And again, don't forget all that NATO sized ammo!)

If one merely google map's the region from a God's Eye view perspective, it is plain to see what's been going in light of the neocons' PNAC manifesto.


Fukushima's only different from the US' own nuclear testing back in the day in that Fukushima now emits radiation EVERY SECOND of EVERY DAY. Chernobyl's accident was almost the same type of result, but a different cause, however, the "experts" in Japan kept lying to everyone and early on made some really poor <deleted expletive> choices as far as mitigation of fallout/escaping radiation within the first few days/weeks of the meltdown. I guess the best thing now would be to design and build "a sarcophagus" at Fukushima.

Heck of world we live in folks.


-PW
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th August 2019 - 06:51 PM