9/11 Planes were hijacked from ground stations, Norad anti-hijacking software used Options

[GroundControl]

The 9/11 theory that I believe the most is that the aircraft's FMC's were hijacked (hacked) from the ground. Anyone here have any thoughts on that?

Some of my reasoning for this:
-I believe this would require the least amount of involvement
-would explain the fashion of all hijacks being similar
-would explain the amazing flying skills
-require the least amount of work and possibility for error
-Atleast some of the aircraft had chances to be modified right before 9/11
(example, N591UA was diverted away from Newark on Sept. 10th 2001 because of a strange fire that closed EWR for 0.5 hours)

Basically, I'm just asking anyone who knows if these aircraft have the capability of being completely taken over by the ground, this including radios and transponders? I know the aircraft types and their specs, just not everything about avionics.

[THE_DECIDER]

1) the patsies never had the wheel?
2) the patsies were "oswalded"?
3) planes were less then 1/4 normal capacity
4) virtually all black boxes are distroyed.

to hard to tell, those planes could have been hijacked weeks prior, or compramised that morning..

IMO: somebody took time to research the best flights to take, and at what opimal times, and made sure the "terrorists" would be on ALL flights unmolested, and also made sure that the planes would be under 1/4 capacity, if there was even any passangeres at all....

givin the war games, and the FAA somewhat in the loop, i would say that the CIA/FBI, plotted, and aquired the jets to be used on 9/11.....

IN THEORY OFCOARSE (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)

[NJcpaTOM]

What difference would it make to hijack the planes before they got off the ground. None of the 4 aircraft that took-off has been located and/or admitted to being recovered that I am aware of. Those Flights are still missing.

No airplane wreckage at the Pentagon.

No airplane wreckage at the alleged "crash site" in Shanksville.

The "Flight 175" aircraft that took of from Boston airport wasn't the same aircraft as the one that crashed into the second tower.

The above leaves me to think that maybe the flimsy "Flight 11" aircraft may have been substituted for also. Didn't someone report seeing one of the hijackers of this plane alive? Yet more passengers remains turned up in October 2006 ?

Insert "Twilight Zone" theme.

(IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/pilotfly.gif)

[muhammadcolumbo]

The 9/11 theory that I believe the most is that the aircraft's FMC's were hijacked (hacked) from the ground.  Anyone here have any thoughts on that? 

For hijacking from the ground see my web page http://users.swing.be/muhammadcolumbo/indexe.htm

Download the power point presentation and look for all details.

This post has been edited by muhammadcolumbo: Dec 5 2006, 04:07 PM

[JerryB9105]

TO NJCPATOM -- You just said something there that for some reason kinda struck me as an awakening to something I have realized all along but at the same time never gave it much thought. Those airplanes --

Yeah we've seen them (at least two in video footage) and have been led by the nose regarding those other two and what they are guilty of doing (all accordingly to the official story, of course).

Yeah each one was involved in a crash of sorts (again allegedly) and yet there is absolutely NO PROOF // NO REAL EVIDENCE of any airplanes. Let alone trying to get understanding down to brass tacks (as some say) and prove serial number identification, that sort of thing. Other than what we've seen in the Naudet Bros first strike video (WTC1) and the airplane crashing into WTC2, and then the alleged airplane (??) that crashed into the Pentagon, and then lastly, a follow up with the alleged airplane that crashed (shot down is more likely) over Shanksville, PA. There's NO PROOF // NO REAL EVIDENCE (and I'm not even getting into the fabricated evidence or credentials of any 19 alleged hi-jackers) -- I'm just trying to keep it simple -- airplanes.

Talk about mirrors and wires and magic tricks -- Here's four airplanes, BIG ONES, seen by video, seen by alleged witnesses, heard from via alleged cell phone/seat back phone calls // and yet NOT ONE DAMN AIRPLANE can be found in the mix where any of it might be reassembled (in part or in all) of its various 'exploded' parts to at least attempt to verify there even was a damn airplane. This question of it being an airplane or a missile or a Global Hawk goes way beyond any Pentagon crash.

Four airplanes // And not one good piece to plug into any of the puzzle.

9/11 was an inside job. And the 9/11 Commission Report is a 567-page collection of lies, a sham on top of the Mother Of All Shams. There is not a damn thing about any of the official story (not one thing) that can stand up to common sense.

**********
I'd like to see a simple listing, one line each (if possible), devoted to each one of these crazy-stupid facts that comprise 9/11, double spaced for clarity (easy to read and understand) -- just to keep a running tally on all of the inconsistencies and 'first time ever happenings' kind of record of events. Things get lost when they are explained in great detail (a book for example, and everybody has one or is working on one -- or a lengthy Commission Report) // I'd like to see a simple listing (KISS) starting with number-1 and working its way to whatever number is last. A simple list where I might say, 'Here take a look at what the TRUTH really is". No particular order, just the TRUTHS as we have come awake to them. Of course order would be nice too, it always helps.

typo

This post has been edited by JerryB9105: Dec 8 2006, 06:44 PM

[e-dog]

Could anyone please tell me why GroundControl is banned?


IT--