IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor". A Documentary By Massimo Mazzucco

Nagelfar
post Nov 19 2013, 11:21 PM
Post #1





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 32
Joined: 3-May 08
Member No.: 3,272



"Review of "September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor". A documentary by Massimo Mazzucco.

David Ray Griffin

There have been several good films and videos about 9/11. But the new film by award-winning film-maker Massimo Mazzucco is in a class by itself.

For those of us who have been working on 9/11 for a long time, this is the film we have been waiting for.

Whereas there are excellent films treating the falsity of particular parts of the official account, such as the Twin Towers or WTC 7, Mazzucco has given us a comprehensive documentary treatment of 9/11, dealing with virtually all of the issues.

There have, of course, been films that treated the fictional official story as true. And there are films that use fictional stories to portray people’s struggles after starting to suspect the official story to be false.

But there is no fiction in Mazzucco’s film – except in the sense that it clearly and relentlessly exposes every part of the official account as fictional.

Because of his intent at completeness, Mazzucco has given us a 5-hour film. It is so fascinating and fast-paced that many will want to watch it in one sitting. But this is not necessary, as the film, which fills 3 DVDs, consists of 7 parts, each of which is divided into many short chapters.

These 7 parts treat Air Defence, The Hijackers, The Airplanes, The Pentagon, Flight 93, The Twin Towers, and Building 7. In each part, after presenting facts that contradict the official story, Mazzucco deals with the claims of the debunkers (meaning those who try to debunk the evidence provided by the 9/11 research community).

The Introduction, reflecting the film’s title, deals with 12 uncanny parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11.

The film can educate people who know nothing about 9/11 (beyond the official story), those with a moderate amount of knowledge about the various problems with the official story, and even by experts. (I myself learned many things.)

Mazzucco points out that his film covers 12 years of public debate about 9/11. People who have been promoting 9/11 truth for many of these years will see that their labors have been well-rewarded: There is now a high-quality, carefully-documented film that dramatically shows the official story about 9/11 to be a fabrication through and through.

This is truly the film we have been waiting for."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Massive (5 hours) new documentary in three parts. Trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmM4Tra-rg0

Part 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk

Part 2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7mDXHn_byA

Part 3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DegLpgJmFL8




Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
signalfire
post Nov 20 2013, 12:28 AM
Post #2





Group: Student Forum Pilot
Posts: 20
Joined: 5-June 08
Member No.: 3,508



Thank you for posting this in its entirety; I agree it is a very important addition to the available evidence and discussion on 9-11.

As a 9-11 researcher myself, I learned something new and it allowed me to put together another piece of the puzzle.

Dick Cheney is on video in this (I think in Part III but it's been a while since I watched it) being interviewed within a few days of the attacks and I paraphrase,
'we watched the second tower hit, and I called President Bush, and then the Secret Service rushed into the room and whisked me down to the PEOC'...

I've also seen FBI testimony by his secretary, and this version is, 'we watched the second tower hit on TV and I heard a commotion out in the hallway; I went to the door in time to see VP Cheney being carried down the hallway by the Secret Service'...

No mention of an incoming or outgoing call to President Bush.

Now Cheney had no way of knowing that we had video of Bush sitting like a doofus in the classroom for all those long minutes. We KNOW he didn't get a call from or make a call to VP Cheney. We also know from other testimony that phone calls were rather difficult to make by that point, and that communication even between the PEOC and Air Force One were difficult.

There's even a photo out there of Cheney standing OUTSIDE the PEOC in the hallway, trying to contact Bush on the phone and being unsuccessful. Why you would use a hallway phone rather than go inside the PEOC, the most well equipped communications center on the planet, remains to be seen.

I think this is one of the reasons Cheney and Bush finally agreed to be 'questioned' by the 911 Commission but only without records, tapes, not being sworn in, and holding hands. Cheney is the one who gave the shootdown order, and it wasn't yet okayed by Bush; in other words, high crimes and misdemeanors, or a coup d'etat.

Remember Richard Clarke saying that he was amazed at how fast orders were coming 'from Cheney, and through him from President Bush'??
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th December 2019 - 04:08 PM