IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Aviation Auto Pilots

Miro
post Sep 6 2013, 11:15 AM
Post #41





Group: Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: 4-August 13
From: Slovenia
Member No.: 7,473



Can someone coment this statement from the page http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/aerobatics.html

Hani Hanjour may not have been up to the task, but a 757's flight control computer seems sufficient. It's equipped with radar altimeters and accurate GPS monitors for precise altitude and position tracking. It can analyze and respond to conditions hundreds of times per second. Examples of the extreme capabilities of fly-by-wire systems are reverse swept-wing aircraft, which are inherently unstable and require rapid adjustment of the plane's control surfaces.

Miro
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rob balsamo
post Sep 6 2013, 02:46 PM
Post #42



Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 13-August 06
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (Miro @ Sep 6 2013, 11:15 AM) *
Can someone coment this statement from the page http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/aerobatics.html


Miro


That information is more than 7 years old and clearly written by a layman using pure speculation. For example.. the 757 Flight Control System is not "Fly-By-Wire". It is hydraulic and mechanical.

More data has also been released since.

See more here for accurate analysis performed by verified aviation experts based on data provided by govt agencies.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=20969

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=14670

and related topics here...

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/wtc_speed

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/wtc_speed_part2.html

Welcome to the forum!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
amazed!
post Sep 7 2013, 10:05 AM
Post #43





Group: Extreme Forum Pilot
Posts: 4,018
Joined: 14-December 06
From: Fort Pierce, FL
Member No.: 331



QUOTE (Miro @ Sep 6 2013, 11:15 AM) *
Can someone coment this statement from the page http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/aerobatics.html

Hani Hanjour may not have been up to the task, but a 757's flight control computer seems sufficient. It's equipped with radar altimeters and accurate GPS monitors for precise altitude and position tracking. It can analyze and respond to conditions hundreds of times per second. Examples of the extreme capabilities of fly-by-wire systems are reverse swept-wing aircraft, which are inherently unstable and require rapid adjustment of the plane's control surfaces.

Miro


In the final analysis, Hani's maneuver was a visual one, and no civilian type autopilot could do it.

Especially when one considers that Hani was sitting in a Boeing for the first time in his life. He was a notoriously lousy pilot, and could never have done what is claimed, autopilot or not.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th October 2018 - 08:21 PM