IPBFacebook



POSTS MADE TO THIS FORUM ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF PILOTS FOR 911 TRUTH
FOR OFFICIAL PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH STATEMENTS AND ANALYSIS, PLEASE VISIT PILOTSFOR911TRUTH.ORG


DIGITAL DOWNLOADS

WELCOME - PLEASE REGISTER OR LOG IN FOR FULL FORUM ACCESS ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Mark Cuban Exposes O'reilly Hypocrisy, On Radio Broadcast

DemolitionCrew
post Mar 24 2007, 01:40 PM
Post #1


Vermontbound


Group: Newbie
Posts: 890
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 73



http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march...lyhypocrisy.htm

Mark Cuban Exposes O'Reilly Hypocrisy On Radio Broadcast

Hearst yellow journalism devotees Popular Mechanics, NY Post enlisted to debunk 9/11 truth again

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Saturday, March 24, 2007


Billionaire Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks who is set to finance a cinema release of Loose Change narrated by Charlie Sheen, exposed Bill O'Reilly's rampant hypocrisy concerning his coverage of the 9/11 truth movement on the Fox News host's radio show yesterday.

Offering the entire 18 minute segment will probably result in Bill calling on Fox security to pay us a visit so here's a 9 minute clip instead.

O'Reilly admits right off the bat that he has not even seen Loose Change, following in the trend of his fellow debunkers who have already arrived at a judgment without even checking the evidence. Bill's mind is made up! Don't bother him with the facts!

This painfully underscores exactly what this whole charade represents, not an open debate on the evidence, but a cynical attempt to smear Charlie Sheen, Rosie O'Donnell and Mark Cuban.

O'Reilly wastes no time in doing so by associating Loose Change with "Nazi propaganda."

O'Reilly's claim might hold more weight if Dylan Avery were in control of a powerful industrial country, ran its media and commanded its standing army, but last time I checked Dylan still lives in upstate New York with his friends and a dog called Justice.

"The security in the World Trade Center would have been impossible for anybody to have set charges," claims O'Reilly, oblivious to the fact that, as World Trade Center worker Scott Forbes, a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc. confirms, power downs and evacuation exercises in the towers were taking place on the weekend before 9/11, giving ample opportunity for incendiary devices to be placed. WTC workers Ben Fountain and William Rodriquez also confirmed this.

At this point Popular Mechanics editor-in-chief James Meigs chimes in to state that the impact of the jetliners and the fires they caused were enough to bring down the towers, a claim that is completely contradicted by the very design architects of the World Trade Center, who are all on the record as saying they designed the building to handle multiple impacts of large jetliners.

Meigs has an illustrious pedigree that puts him right up there with the professors and scholars that have studied 9/11 and the architects who designed the WTC - I just can't decide which title to give prominence, his position on the editorial staff of that bastion of scientific empiricism Entertainment Weekly or the equally respected Video Review.



Popular Mechanics is owned by Hearst Publishing. As fictionalized in Orson Welles' acclaimed film Citizen Kane, William Randolph Hearst (pictured) wrote the book on cronyism and yellow journalism and Popular Mechanics hasn't bucked that tradition.

Enter the term "yellow journalism" in the Encyclopedia Britannica and one of the first entries you will see is William Randolph Hearst. The listing attributes to Hearst a legacy of "distorted" and "lurid" reporting, and cites him as being hugely influential in fanning the flames of the Spanish-American war as a result of his newspaper's sensationalist yellow journalism.

Popular Mechanics is owned by the very corporation that defined yellow journalism!

During the interview, O'Reilly lauds Popular Mechanics as politically independent and non-partisan, "Popular Mechanics is not a political magazine, it's a technical magazine," when in fact it was darling of the Republican party John McCain who penned the foreword to Popular Mechanics' Debunking 9/11 Myths book.

In the foreword, McCain re-hashes an abhorrent amount of Neo-Con detritus that relies solely on 9/11 having happened exactly as the government claims it did. "We liberated Afghanistan from the murderous rule of the Taliban, our attackers' proud hosts. We chased Al Qaeda around the globe," barks the Arizona Senator.

Does this sound politically neutral to you?

Returning to the radio broadcast, O'Reilly brings on Mark Cuban, the billionaire owner of the Dallas Mavericks who plans to mass distribute Loose Change, and immediately makes an argument that Loose Change should be banned just as some books should be banned. Cuban points out that O'Reilly's insistence that "lunacy not be given legitimacy" by affording it any attention is contradicted by the very fact that O'Reilly is covering the controversy on his radio and TV show.

O'Reilly persists with his argument of "marginalizing cranks" which Cuban refutes by asking "how many shows have you spent on this topic?" O'Reilly claims he has only done one show on 9/11 conspiracies which is patently false. O'Reilly has attacked both Jim Fetzer and Kevin Barrett numerous times on his television show.

Cuban's appeal to freedom of speech and his involvement in putting out previous documentaries in association with the Republican party gives strong credence to his argument that people need to hear all sides of the argument, in contrast to O'Reilly's shrill demands for censorship of a film that he hasn't even bothered to watch.

O'Reilly then plays the obligatory Holocaust card to claim Loose Change is insulting to the victims, a myth that we have exposed a dozen times in the past. The representative of the largest 9/11 family victim's group, Bill Doyle who also lost his son in the attacks, is on the record as saying half of his members now have grave questions about what happened on 9/11.

"He's finished," barks O'Reilly, echoing the threat made on his TV show that narrating Loose Change will end Charlie Sheen's career, a baseless assumption considering Sheen's career has only achieved more prominence in the year since he went public on 9/11 to the Alex Jones Show.

Repeating his mafia-like warning of "I'm looking out for him (Sheen) and I'm looking out for you too," O'Reilly concludes the interview by urging Cuban to rethink the project, stating "there's a lot of pain involved in this kind of a situation." With rhetoric like this, O'Reilly wouldn't have looked out of place had he been born into the Genovese Cosa Nostra family.



Hannity & Colmes covered the Cuban/Sheen issue on their Friday night show.

New York Post Tabloid Hack Johnson Attacks Sheen Again

In a related development, undeterred by the criticism of his awful yellow journalism hit piece on Thursday, in which he couldn't even get the names right of the people he was attacking, the New York Post's Richard Johnson is back for more, lauding the fact that his "exclusive" (which we have known for over a year) was confirmed by Sheen himself.

The Post quotes Charlie Sheen who told Extra yesterday, "It's a story that needs to be told. It's a story about the truth, and the truth needs to be exposed." It's not just me, not just the Hollywood community [who] is standing up saying what you have given us doesn't make sense. We just want better answers."

Johnson recycles the outright lie that the controlled demolition hypothesis has been "debunked," and states that the evidence presented in Loose Change was"also soundly refuted by Popular Mechanics magazine, which shot down every single assertion made by the conspiracy theorists."

In reality, crowned Kings and originators of yellow journalism Popular Mechanics' Debunking 9/11 farce was nothing more than a strawman assault based around nepotism, shoddy research and agenda-driven politics.



The arguments presented in the article and the following book have been widely debunked by the 9/11 truth community as an example of a straw man hatchet job - whereby false arguments are erected, attributed to 9/11 skeptics, and then shot down.

One of the most glaring errors in the Popular Mechanics hit piece appears in the 'Intercepts Not Routine' section where it is claimed that, "In the decade before 9/11, NORAD intercepted only one civilian plane over North America: golfer Payne Stewart's Learjet, in October 1999."

As Jim Hoffman points out in his excellent rebuttal, "This bold assertion flies in the face of a published report of scramble frequencies that quotes the same Maj. Douglas Martin that is one of PM's cited experts!"

"From Sept. 11 to June, NORAD scrambled jets or diverted combat air patrols 462 times, almost seven times as often as the 67 scrambles from September 2000 to June 2001, Martin said."

The article also makes no mention whatsoever of the numerous war games scheduled for the morning of 9/11 which confused air defense personnel as to the true nature of the attack as it unfolded, as is documented by the recent release of the NORAD tapes.

A section on the collapse of the World Trade Center fails to address firefighters and other individuals who reported numerous explosions before the towers fell, squibs of debris seen shooting out of the towers well below the collapse point, and the fact that the towers fell only slightly slower than absolute free fall.

The magazine is a cheerleader for the sophistication of advanced weaponry and new technology used by police in areas such as crowd control and 'anti-terror' applications. A hefty chunk of its advertising revenue relies on the military and defense contractors. Since the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and in the future Iran, all cite 9/11 as a pretext, what motivation does the magazine have to conduct a balanced investigation and risk upsetting its most coveted clientele?

A full debunking of the debunkers run-down article is available here.

Expect the Sheen/Loose Change/O'Donnell controversy to rumble on into next week and for the Neo-Con blowhards to sink further into the quicksand, attempting to marginalize the 9/11 truth movement yet only succeeding at making themselves look stupid and bringing more people over to our side.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DemolitionCrew
post Mar 24 2007, 01:55 PM
Post #2


Vermontbound


Group: Newbie
Posts: 890
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 73



If you listen to the broadcast....Bill O'Reilly sounds like a scared little chicken. These guys are on the run....comparing Loose Change to holacaust denial.

nonono.gif

Here is the radio broadcast for those that could not pull it out of the article.

http://prisonplanet.com/audio/240307oreilly.mp3

This post has been edited by DemolitionCrew: Mar 24 2007, 01:56 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chucksheen
post Mar 24 2007, 02:04 PM
Post #3





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 360
Joined: 4-November 06
Member No.: 208



Good stuff, thanks.

Mark Cuban better get prepared.

Just post a thread Mark and we can all pitch in and tighten up your game to a T.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DemolitionCrew
post Mar 24 2007, 02:06 PM
Post #4


Vermontbound


Group: Newbie
Posts: 890
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 73



I would say the establishment had better get ready. The JIG is UP!!!! :ph43r:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mo fiya
post Mar 24 2007, 02:11 PM
Post #5





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 806
Joined: 17-October 06
Member No.: 104



Alan Colmes: "Can we believe everything the government tells us?"

Reagen: "What kind of question is that?"

Alan Colmes: "A GOOD one."

--------

Anyone else get the feeling Colmes knows a little more than he leads everyone to believe?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chucksheen
post Mar 24 2007, 02:22 PM
Post #6





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 360
Joined: 4-November 06
Member No.: 208



QUOTE (mo fiya @ Mar 24 2007, 01:11 PM)
Alan Colmes: "Can we believe everything the government tells us?"

Reagen: "What kind of question is that?"

Alan Colmes: "A GOOD one."

--------

Anyone else get the feeling Colmes knows a little more than he leads everyone to believe?

That was great.

Hopefully Colmes reads Debunking 9/11 Debunking and continues on a roll.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mo fiya
post Mar 24 2007, 02:41 PM
Post #7





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 806
Joined: 17-October 06
Member No.: 104



hey chucksheen whats up! long time no see!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DemolitionCrew
post Mar 24 2007, 03:35 PM
Post #8


Vermontbound


Group: Newbie
Posts: 890
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 73



mo fiya ..

They are quaking in their boots....

Michael Reagan's pause after Alan Combs asked him the question was deafening tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
grizz
post Mar 24 2007, 03:41 PM
Post #9


aka Oceans Flow


Group: Respected Member
Posts: 3,211
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Oregon
Member No.: 108



That Hannity thing is extra lame.

lame.gif

Pathetic, really.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DemolitionCrew
post Mar 24 2007, 03:48 PM
Post #10


Vermontbound


Group: Newbie
Posts: 890
Joined: 15-October 06
Member No.: 73



I wonder, how long its going to be before lames like Hannity and Beck start jumping ship???? Its fun watching these cockroaches squirm!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
liberty-911
post Mar 24 2007, 05:21 PM
Post #11





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 334
Joined: 17-February 07
Member No.: 627



Swamp his website: www.hannity.com/ at the top of the page Contact Us. Leave all the links to 911 Truth websites. Do it everyday until he waves a white Flag. Folks, our Government Officials will one day face a Jury for the charge of High Treason. Sean Hannity, Rush and thousands of others Media and Corporate Officials will be charged with Treason, accessory after the Facts. Note: the restitution will be multi-trillions of dollars, and of course the SLAMMER!
This is what I pasted on Sean's website.

On September 11, 2001 at 5:25PM World Trade Center; Building # 7 collapsed
perfectly vertical, symmetrically in 6.4 seconds (@free-fall speed) transforming concrete slabs into dust, within its own footprint because the Fire Department decided to pull the building. A perfect, late implosion. Why? (Software Delays?)
Officially, announced by Larry Silverstein, the lease holder (evidence) on CNN, without any aircraft impact or jet fuel fire damage.
How Did The Fire Department Pull Down This Building, On This Day?
To verify all the above statements we only need to examine all the existing evidence before 911, during 911 and all that exists up until now.

TIME LINE QUESTIONS:

1) At what time of this day did WTC Building 7 Security guards vacated their post and give building security to Federal, State, or City Agencies?
2) Who ordered all of the necessary explosive devices required by type, weight, and quantity for a 47 story building implosion, the exact time, of this day?
3) Where did the explosive devices come from? Around the block or hours away?
4) Who pre-trained between 50 to 100 or more, firemen needed to place the right amount of explosives in the right places inside this building by floor plan blueprints? Where as this implosion requires 47 floors to be studied and learned in a very short amount of time in order to select the precise steel beams needed to fail for a perfect collapse? (Firemen training records will reveal these facts, if any).
5) Who programmed the software needed to detonate all the explosions by calculating million or trillion of a second time delays, from scratch, on this day?
6) Did they use timed blasting caps, detonation cord and the old fashion plunger?
7) How does a Fire Department purchase all of these explosive devices from vendors, in the spare of a moment, during a day like this?
8) Who delivered these explosive devices at this scene, the exact time, of this day?
9) Time and date of New York City Building Demolition Permit?

To make the above announcement true, all of the logistical and technical evidence to these questions must consistently agree with each other, in order to establish the fact that this building did collapsed this day, by only spontaneous reactions, on this day.
If evidence proves that these activities started well before this day and planned to occur in conjunction with the Twin Tower attacks, then proof of prior knowledge exists and is the only logical explanation of the facts, without any reasonable doubts. Prior government knowledge of the 911 attack explains why all government defensive and offensive systems or missions failed on this day to stop, repel or indict persons for the crimes against our citizens, this crime is about oath, Treason. Commission Reports without jury trial verdicts are consistent with just another government cover-up. For us, “We The People” to maintain this more perfect union reestablish “Justice”, government can not exist above our Laws, or above God!
This charge is Treason, and all offenders will have a legal jury trail verdict.
Join your State or County Militia: it’s Your Right; it’s Your Duty; it’s Your Choice;
To Preserve, Protect, and Defend this U.S. Constitution, before its total destruction.

What is more important than Treason in America? Or an Accessory after the Facts!
Please take the time to share your prior research of these nine questions.
Please, send your factual answers to me:
liberty_911@yahoo.com

Search for your Truth!
www.video.google.com
Type in a site name listed below in the search bar:

“The Cause”

1) America Freedom to Fascism
2) The Illuminati
3) Bohemian Grove
4) The New World Order
5) Bilderberg
6) The Light Behind Masonry
7) Skull and Bones
8) Trilateral Commission
9) Council on Foreign Relations

“The Effect”

1) September 11, Evidence to the Contrary Redux06
2) September 11th Revisited were explosives used
3) 911 Mysteries Demolitions Full Length
4) 911Controlled Demolitions of September 11, 2001
5) 911eyewitness
6) William Rodriguez 9/11 Hero
7) Terrorstorm
8) 911 The Greatest Lie Ever Sold
9) Martial Law 911
10) 911 The Road to Tyranny
11) JFK Assassination
12) JFK Jr.
13) Treason (Kennedy Body Guards)

“The Solution”

www.google.com
Type in a site name listed below in the search bar:

1) Ellen Mariani RICO Law Suit
2) William Rodriguez RICO Law Suit
3) The Law That Never Was (Treason) Amendment XVI, not Legally Ratified.
4) The Patriot Act (Treason) Without an Amendment “ABOLISH”
5) National I.D. (treason) Without an Amendment “ABOLISH” State’s Right Only.
6) The Military Commission Act (Treason) Without an Amendment “ABOLISH”
7) North American Union (Treason) without signing our U.S. Constitution, to join.
8) Make Sure Every Vote Counts Petition
9) Scholars Call for Release of 9/11 Information Petition
10) Arcolgy (Build Future Cities, in the Present)
11) Billy Meier (And Still They Fly) or (theyfly.com)
12) ITEC’s Free Electricity Program (Look for jeffotto website)
13) Join you’re State Militia (U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 & 16.

To alter or abolish our U.S. Constitutional Rights,
without a verifiable ratified amendment is a crime,
TREASON!
(Aid The Enemy)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Truthseekers
post Mar 24 2007, 08:32 PM
Post #12





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 405
Joined: 15-October 06
From: Outside the sheep pen.
Member No.: 66



Just gotta to have those fools captured and kept in a padded cell. The sooner gumps like that are put in their place, the better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
liberty-911
post Mar 24 2007, 11:32 PM
Post #13





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 334
Joined: 17-February 07
Member No.: 627



If I just had some of Mark Cuban's wealth I would create a website home page with links to all the Truth Movements websites by icons on one page. Also, I would pay these Truth Movement websites some money to post an Activism icon on their website which will link to all the other websites. So instead of 50 Patriots reading an activity to participate in, there will 500,000 Patriots. A word to the Wealthy. If you think by remaining silent and allowing the destruction of our U.S Constitution is going to protect your wealth, good luck. Void of a Union, founded on equal Life, Liberty, and Property grants you what Rights? NONE! Figure it out.

This post has been edited by liberty-911: Mar 24 2007, 11:33 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sue
post Mar 25 2007, 05:03 PM
Post #14





Group: Respected Member
Posts: 400
Joined: 8-January 07
Member No.: 418



QUOTE
A word to the Wealthy. If you think by remaining silent and allowing the destruction of our U.S Constitution is going to protect your wealth, good luck. Void of a Union, founded on equal Life, Liberty, and Property grants you what Rights? NONE! Figure it out.


Excellent Liberty 9-11! thumbsup.gif They need to hear this but very few of them will ever listen.

History shows us that when freedom is taken away and fascism reigns there is always talk of "equality", but in reality the opposite happens. The fascist party favorites become the controlling elite and everybody else is just scraping by as a worker or becomes cannon fodder for the inevitable wars (for the purpose of keeping the fascists in power). It inevitably works out this way; Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia, Mao's China, Mussolini's Italy, Nero's Rome, Castro's Cuba, etc., etc., etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th February 2020 - 03:43 AM