R. I. P. - No Plane Theory, Jim Fetzer evading questions Options

[rob balsamo]

I did - and humbly stand corrected.

You're welcome TM!

Many feel that the NPT was/is an orchestrated disinformation campaign in order to obfuscate and marginalize the research done at the Pentagon and Shanksville during that time.

The NPT was running rampant at the time significant findings were being uncovered in Pentagon Research. Much of those people who started the NPT back then are no longer around.

Case in point....
http://www.infowars.com/is-nico-haupt-a-co...ro-operative-2/

[Tamborine man]

Famous line from Cool Hand Luke--what we have here is a failure to communicate.

Strother Martin!

[onesliceshort]

Nevertheless, i'll continue to defend the 'no plane theory' with regards to pentagon and Shanksville,

That phrase is exactly why I objected to Fetzer's wordplay and his lumping of Pentagon and Shankesville research in with NPT.

It's not a case of crossed lines TM. There were planes involved. Any fudging of the definition of NPT doesn't interest me mate.

Edit: and the only paper I found online regarding DARPA and 3D holographic technology using Strontium Barium Niobate was the one I discussed (well, posted, nobody ever commented bar Senor el Once at TAS who has now rejected NPT having touted it for four years).

It's titled "3-D Holographic Display Using Strontium Barium Niobate". (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif)

This post has been edited by onesliceshort: May 8 2012, 03:26 PM

[Tamborine man]

That phrase is exactly why I objected to Fetzer's wordplay and his lumping of Pentagon and Shankesville research in with NPT.

It's not a case of crossed lines TM. There were planes involved. Any fudging of the definition of NPT doesn't interest me mate.

Hi OSS,
i got absolutely no interest in any kind of "wordplay" or "fudging of definitions" at all. For me
it is alone a question of Truth, the pursuit of Truth, telling the Truth, the whole Truth, and
nothing but the Truth.

I found Swing Danglers '17 points' over at CIT's discussion forum:

invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=317

It should be very clear and obvious from this, that the 17 points are meant to be seen as a
very strong defense of CIT's "no plane theory". I.e., no plane impacted the pentagon!

As Rob so rightly pointed out, and that i also pointed out, NPT was/is used as a very powerful
weapon (indeed a two-edged 'sword') to denigrate, discredit and annihilate CIT, P4T and their
supporters.
(I urge you to have a look over at truthfraction right at this moment)!

At WTC it is worse. Here the NPT people are called 'lunatic disinfo'es' by not only the shills,
loyalists and the professional disinformants, but also by other 'truthers' who are now siding
with their 'detractors'; albeit for completely other reasons!

The confusion is total, and that's why i was hoping to come to some agreement with you, to
try to alleviate some of this BS - but alas, this doesn't seem to be possible.

Edit: and the only paper I found online regarding DARPA and 3D holographic technology using Strontium Barium Niobate was
the one I discussed (well, posted, nobody ever commented bar Senor el Once at TAS who has now rejected NPT having touted
it for four years).

It's titled "3-D Holographic Display Using Strontium Barium Niobate". (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif)

In the thread "Debunkers respond to Cimino", you must have overlooked my post no.140!

And you must have overlooked it again in my reply post no. 210 to you on 27/3-12, where
i wrote:

"Please read in conjunction with quote from DARPA's budget paper, as shown in post 140!"

I my post no. 299 addressed to Rob on 15/4-12, I only quoted the pertinent part from the

DARPA Paper that i was interested in, as follows:
"…..
more sophisticated technology would have been utilized then; sort of more in line with what
DARPA was playing around with in those days - and of course, before that time as well:"

".....
These programs will also explore a combination of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS)
based electro-optic spatial light modulators in combination with very short pulse solid state
lasers to provide powerful new capabilities for secure communication up-links (multi-gigabits
per second), aberration free 3-dimensional imaging and targeting at very long ranges
(> 1000 kilometers).

Cheers

PS!
To give you a little glimpse of where i'm coming from, and perhaps imbue a little calm, i
recommend to you this gentle chant:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.p...0&start=840

PPS!
Link to CIT doesn't work!
Found in 'Pentagon' thread, under title: 'There is no friggin plane impact'. Post of 29/8-08.

This post has been edited by Tamborine man: May 9 2012, 02:19 AM

[elreb]

It should be very clear and obvious from this, that the 17 points are meant to be seen as a
very strong defense of CIT's "no plane theory". I.e., no plane impacted the pentagon!

I find it a lot simpler to state that AA 11, AA77, UA 93 and UA 173 did not hit anything.

Personally, I do not believe that any civilian 757/767 caused any damage.

[23investigator]

I find it a lot simpler to state that AA 11, AA77, UA 93 and UA 173 did not hit anything.

Personally, I do not believe that any civilian 757/767 caused any damage.

Dear 'elreb'

at the end of the day, it will be you, that is "right" on the money.

Robert S

[amazed!]

Agreed, Elreb!

[Tamborine man]

Agreed, elreb -

Cheers

[23investigator]

Agreed, elreb -

Cheers

Dear 'Tamborine man'

Please forgive me, but needed somewhere to tag this onto.
Just dealing, with the Boeing 757 -first-, that is the Pentagon.

Mr Bob Pugh, had no doubt in his mind, right from the first instant, that it did not appear a large commercial aircraft had come in impact with the Pentagon wall.
He expressed also there was no collatoral damage to support such a notion, in fact reporting the hole he saw in the wall as no more than 16 feet wide, as he expressed it, the size of a 'domestic garage door'.
This can be viewed on you tube --9/11 truth: Pentagon Eye Witness Bob Pugh Tells his story.
http://youtu.be/-xtEJ4zrlPM

On the same video, at 4:41 a Gentleman is handling a piece of debris, which people about comment could be part of the undercarriage of an aircraft, other comment made argued against this, saying it was too small.
Whoever made that comment was on the 'money', there can be little doubt, in fact when carefully considered, the part looks to have come away from another part of an aircraft, which was most definitely not a Boeing 757.
Another video on you tube --9/11 Pentagon Explosion and missing plane wreckage
http://youtu.be/YSGK13Cgg
At 9:41, shows the same gentleman holding the same piece of debris.

Another video on you tube -- Witness D C 9/11
http://youtu.be/DifwsjF8X5L
At 10:54 shows a Gentleman handling a piece of debris, with every appearance, of being ripped from some sort of aircraft. A person in the background can be heard to say --that is not from a commercial aircraft-- it is too thin, and comes from a smaller plane--, or words to that effect.
There can be little doubt that the man's opinion was on the 'money'.

It is puzzling to consider, why these instance of hard evidence, are being ignored, and the people involved have not been sought out, for their observations.

Robert S

[amazed!]

Robert

For me, all 3 of those YouTubes were 'no longer available' (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif)

[23investigator]

Robert

For me, all 3 of those YouTubes were 'no longer available' (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dunno.gif)

Dear 'amazed'

The internet seems to have those days.
In fact when I went to check out your comment it took a number of tries to get to it.
All other topics opened 'ok'.

When I went back into 'google' to use the address http;//youtu.be/DifwsjF8X5L, it told me it could not find such a topic.
I added the title Witness D.C. 9/11.
Same non result.

I then just used the title.
Witness D.C. 9/11.
Google brought it up.

The youtube info says
Full documentry new in 2010
uploaded by CTV911
Jan7 2011
7776 views.


Perhaps give that a try 'amazed'.

Hope the method works for you, and the other two.
Perhaps you can be 7777.

Robert S

[bpete1969]

You're welcome TM!

Many feel that the NPT was/is an orchestrated disinformation campaign in order to obfuscate and marginalize the research done at the Pentagon and Shanksville during that time.

The NPT was running rampant at the time significant findings were being uncovered in Pentagon Research. Much of those people who started the NPT back then are no longer around.

Case in point....
http://www.infowars.com/is-nico-haupt-a-co...ro-operative-2/

Unfortunately, NPT will remain alive as long as people like Fetzer have the ability to get their hands on a keyboard.

As for disinfo...consider the method of presentation by the number one proponent of the theory. He makes a totally subjective claim and relies on facts that lay on the periphery of his main argument to bolster the main claim. When that fails, he uses the "only a fool would disagree" ploy and then states that he has proven his case. Any question you pose or rebuttal you offer is immediately dismissed and then he ridicules you for being a "disappointment" to him, or that he expected better of you and you failed. He then tries to throw you off by inundating you with links to all of his past works on the subject as if the fact they are print on a webpage makes then definitive proof that he is right and you are wrong. When that fails, he then falls back on his education and PhD as a way to intimidate you.
Uncle Fetzer was made for disinfo....and you have to commend him on doing the job well, for a time.

[rob balsamo]

When that fails, he uses the "only a fool would disagree" ploy and then states that he has proven his case. Any question you pose or rebuttal you offer is immediately dismissed and then he ridicules you for being a "disappointment" to him, or that he expected better of you and you failed.

Yes, I especially get a good chuckle (well, perhaps a deep belly laugh really) when Fetzer now claims I am not competent to be the head of P4T. Especially given the fact that he knows I created P4T and grown this list of my peers with my work...

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core

Again, Fetzer is just pissed off that we will not endorse his crap, nor does our work support his crap.. .and like clockwork, he attacks anyone who disputes his crap.