David L Griscom Paper, "Handwaving the Physics of 911" |

![]() ![]() |
Jan 23 2009, 06:40 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Global Mod Posts: 5,019 Joined: 2-October 07 From: USA, a Federal corporation Member No.: 2,294 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 2009, 06:57 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Administrator Posts: 7,986 Joined: 13-September 06 Member No.: 49 |
Awesome piece!!!
And witty - I really enjoyed reading it! (IMG:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif) |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2009, 11:00 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 3,773 Joined: 14-December 06 From: Fort Pierce, FL Member No.: 331 |
Yes, very nicely done.
I emailed that guy Garcia from his article at CounterPunch. He responded. I knew he was full of sh*t. |
|
|
|
May 18 2009, 01:48 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Valued Member Posts: 485 Joined: 13-May 09 From: West coaster now in Ontario Member No.: 4,315 |
He nails it here, slam dunk.
"And yet the real elephant in the room still remains Dr. Garcia's tacit assumption that the intact core columns (most of the original 47) and about 200 visibly intact perimeter columns between the two adjacent floors in question SIMULTANEOUSLY lost 100% of their strength at the precise moment of collapse initiation." "In fact, Dr. Garcia's concealed assumption that all the support columns lost ALL of their strength – from floor to ceiling – at a single instant in time (much shorter than the 0.78-second 3-meter free fall time) is unsupported by any evidence, or even by any claim made by N.I.S.T." N.I.S.T. never found evidence of exposives because they never looked for evidence of explosives. Why was that again? Oh right, because it wasn't a controlled demolition because controlled demolitions occur from the bottom up and these buildings collapsed from the top down. The big pack of lies. This post has been edited by JimMac: May 18 2009, 01:50 AM |
|
|
|
May 21 2009, 10:37 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Student Forum Pilot Posts: 20 Joined: 4-May 08 Member No.: 3,273 |
I liked David L Griscom's "Handwaving"the physics of 9/11, in the same vein, on the niceties of scientific publications and peer review see (or read) Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers' Abuse of Science on a hoax article writen by Alan Sokal (Physics professor at NYU) in the scientific paper "Social text" and other (unintended) mystifications. by Alan Sokal + Jean Bricmont Profile Books 1998 A short summary on : http://dannyreviews.com/h/Intellectual_Impostures.html This book is ± 12 $ on Amazon. (No publicity intentended) Hiram |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 11:25 PM |